Tamron Di III-A AFB070X700 17-70mm
Sa plage focale polyvalente de 17-70mm associée à une ouverture constante f/2.8 et une stabilisation VC en font un zoom de tous les jours exceptionnellement lumineux pour les hybrides APS-C Fujifilm X. Sa construction résistante à l'humidité et son poids contenu de 544g renforcent sa praticité pour une utilisation en extérieur, tandis que la motorisation RXD assure un autofocus rapide et silencieux. C'est l'objectif idéal pour les photographes et vidéastes amateurs cherchant un unique zoom à tout faire sans compromis sur la qualité d'image.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is a sharp, stabilized, constant-aperture zoom that covers a hugely versatile range for APS-C cameras. Optical quality is top-tier, stabilization is excellent, and the price makes it one of the best values in the mirrorless lens market. It's heavier than a kit lens and autofocus is just average, but for travel, video, and everyday shooting, it's hard to beat. If you can find it around $600-700, buy it without hesitation.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Constant f/2.8 aperture across the entire 17-70mm range gives you consistent exposure and low-light flexibility. 90th
- Image stabilization is a real standout, landing in the 81st percentile and making handheld video noticeably smoother. 90th
- Optical quality is excellent, with sharpness that puts it in the 90th percentile among all lenses we track. 86th
- Versatile focal range covers everything from wide landscapes to tight portraits without swapping lenses. 84th
- Weather sealing and solid build quality make it a reliable companion for outdoor and travel photography.
Cons
- At 544 grams, it's noticeably heavier and bulkier than typical kit lenses, which can feel front-heavy on smaller bodies.
- Autofocus performance is just average, sitting in the 55th percentile and occasionally hunting in low light.
- Chromatic aberration can be visible at the 50-70mm range, especially in high-contrast scenes.
- The Fujifilm X-mount version lacks a physical aperture ring, which frustrates users who prefer tactile controls.
- Some owners report aperture blade noise when stopping down past f/5.6, which can be annoying during video recording.
What owners think
The Word on the Street
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
D'après 69 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
The proof
Performance
Sharpness is where this lens really earns its reputation. The optical score lands in the 90th percentile across our database, and that translates to real-world images that look crisp from corner to corner, even wide open. You might spot some chromatic aberration creeping in at the longer end, around 50-70mm, but it's the kind of thing you'll only notice if you're pixel-peeping high-contrast edges. For everyday shooting, the contrast and detail hold up beautifully. The constant f/2.8 aperture gives you consistent exposure control and decent subject separation, with bokeh that's smooth enough to sit in the 86th percentile. It's not going to melt backgrounds like an f/1.4 prime, but for a zoom, it's genuinely pleasing.
Autofocus is a bit of a mixed bag. The RXD stepping motor is fast and nearly silent, which is great for video work where you don't want focus noise ruining your audio. But our data puts AF performance right around the 55th percentile, which is solidly middle of the pack. In good light, it snaps into focus without drama. In lower light or with fast-moving subjects, it can hunt a little more than some of the pricier options. The stabilization, on the other hand, is a standout. Sitting in the 81st percentile, the VC system gives you a real advantage for handheld video and low-light stills. You can comfortably shoot at slower shutter speeds than you'd expect, which pairs perfectly with that constant f/2.8 aperture.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 |
| Focal Length Max | 70 |
| Elements | 16 |
| Groups | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 |
| Coating | revestimiento de flúor |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.5 kg / 1.2 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 67 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | RXD |
| Stabilization | Yes |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 190 |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.8 |
vs Competition
The most direct competitor is probably the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Contemporary. The Sigma is smaller, lighter, and cheaper, but you lose the 50-70mm reach and the built-in stabilization. If you're shooting on a body with IBIS and you value compactness above all else, the Sigma makes a strong case. But if you want that extra telephoto compression and the flexibility of VC for video, the Tamron pulls ahead. Then there's the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM, which is a fantastic lens but lives in a different ecosystem entirely. If you're already in the Canon RF-S world, that's your constant-aperture zoom, but it starts at 28mm, which is noticeably tighter than 17mm on the wide end.
For Fujifilm shooters, the comparison gets interesting. Fuji's own XF 16-55mm f/2.8 is optically superb but costs significantly more and lacks stabilization. The Tamron gives you more reach, VC, and a much friendlier price tag, though you do give up the aperture ring and that last bit of Fuji magic in the rendering. The Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 is another alternative, but its variable aperture puts it in a different class entirely. It's a fine lens, but it can't touch the Tamron for low-light work or consistent exposure while zooming.
| Spec | Tamron Di III-A AFB070X700 17-70mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR | Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame STM Auto Focus Prime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 17-70mm | 16-300mm | 28-70mm | 28-200mm | 16-85mm | 50mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 | f/4 | f/3.5 | f/1.8 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E | Canon RF | L-Mount | Nikon F | Panasonic Sigma L |
| Stabilization | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | false | false |
| Weight (g) | 524 | 615 | 495 | 413 | 59 | 297 |
| AF Type | RXD | HLA | STM | Autofocus | AF-S | STM |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | macro | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Af | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Social Proof | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamron Di III-A AFB070X700 17-70mm | 54.8 | 85.8 | 65.3 | 84.4 | 89.9 | 83.5 | 89.8 | 83 | 80.5 |
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare | 54.8 | 83.8 | 58 | 86.6 | 98.8 | 76.5 | 99.6 | 83 | 99.1 |
| Canon RF RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare | 85.4 | 85.8 | 67.3 | 77.5 | 84.4 | 83.5 | 77.4 | 88 | 98.2 |
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare | 54.8 | 77.4 | 74 | 89.5 | 90.9 | 71 | 95.6 | 75.4 | 99.4 |
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Compare | 54.8 | 74.5 | 98.4 | 59.7 | 64.2 | 76.5 | 94.3 | 88 | 92.3 |
| Meike 50mm F1.8 Full Frame STM Auto Focus Prime Compare | 85.4 | 95.8 | 71.4 | 96.2 | 57.2 | 92.8 | 34.1 | 49.9 | 80.5 |
Price
Value & Pricing
Pricing on this lens is all over the map depending on where you look, with a spread of over $157,000 across vendors. Obviously, ignore the outliers. The real street price hovers around $590 to $800 for most bundles, and at that level, this lens is an absolute steal. You're getting a constant f/2.8 zoom with stabilization and weather sealing for roughly half what you'd pay for a first-party equivalent. The value proposition is so strong that it's one of the most common themes in user feedback, with multiple owners calling it the best bang-for-buck zoom they've ever bought.
Compared to Sony's own E-mount zooms or Fujifilm's red-badge XF glass, the Tamron undercuts them significantly while delivering optical performance that's close enough that most people won't see a difference. The bundles that include filters, flashes, and pouches add even more value if you're starting from scratch. If you can find it at the lower end of that price range, it's hard to recommend anything else for an APS-C all-rounder.
Amazon.it 1 offres À partir de 856 €
Read more
Overview
The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is one of those lenses that makes you question why you'd ever need a bag full of primes. It covers a genuinely useful 25.5-105mm equivalent range on APS-C bodies, all while holding a constant f/2.8 aperture. That's the kind of flexibility that lets you shoot wide environmental portraits at 17mm, then zoom in to 70mm for a tight headshot without swapping glass or losing light. For Sony E-mount and Fujifilm X shooters, this thing has become a bit of a cult favorite, and looking at the specs, it's easy to see why.
Tamron packed a lot into this barrel. You get Vibration Compensation that's smart enough to lean on AI for smoother video, a close minimum focus distance of just 190mm at the wide end, and weather sealing that means a little rain won't ruin your day. The optical formula uses 16 elements with a mix of aspherical and ED glass to keep things sharp. At 544 grams, it's not a featherweight pancake lens, but it's also not the kind of brick that makes you leave the camera at home. It sits in that sweet spot where it feels substantial without being a burden.
Who's this for? Honestly, almost anyone with an APS-C mirrorless camera who wants a single do-it-all zoom. Travel photographers who don't want to fumble with lens changes, video shooters who need a constant aperture for consistent exposure while zooming, and even portrait hobbyists who appreciate the flattering compression at 70mm f/2.8. Our database puts it in the 90th percentile for versatility and optical quality, which basically means it's one of the best all-rounders you can strap to your camera right now.
Common Questions
Q: Does this lens have image stabilization, and how effective is it?
Yes, it includes Tamron's VC (Vibration Compensation) system, and it's one of the best features of this lens. Our data puts stabilization performance in the 81st percentile, which means it's well above average. For video, the system uses AI to improve performance over conventional stabilization, and in practice, you can expect noticeably smoother handheld footage and sharper stills at slower shutter speeds.
Q: How does the autofocus perform for video and fast action?
The RXD stepping motor is fast and nearly silent, which makes it great for video where you don't want focus noise picked up by your mic. That said, overall autofocus performance sits in the 55th percentile, so it's solid but not class-leading. In good light, it's snappy and accurate. In dim conditions or with fast-moving subjects, it can hunt a bit more than some higher-end options. For most everyday shooting, it's perfectly fine, but sports and wildlife photographers might want something quicker.
Q: Is this lens weather-sealed?
Yes, it features moisture-resistant construction with seals throughout the barrel, plus a fluorine coating on the front element to repel water and oil. This makes it a solid choice for outdoor and travel photography where you might encounter light rain or dusty conditions. It's not fully waterproof, so don't submerge it, but it'll handle typical bad weather better than unsealed alternatives.
Q: What's the difference between the Sony E-mount and Fujifilm X-mount versions?
Optically, they're identical. The main difference is that the Fujifilm X-mount version lacks a physical aperture ring, which is a departure from most Fuji lenses. You'll need to control aperture through the camera body dials instead. Some Fuji shooters find this breaks their workflow, while others don't mind. Both versions share the same focal range, constant f/2.8 aperture, stabilization, and weather sealing.
Who Should Skip This
Street photographers who prioritize compact, discreet setups should probably look elsewhere. At 544 grams with a fairly substantial barrel, this lens draws more attention and adds more weight than a small prime or a pancake zoom. Our street photography score of 76.5 reflects that it's just not the ideal tool for that job. If you're shooting candid scenes and want to stay nimble, grab a compact 23mm or 35mm prime instead.
Fujifilm shooters who rely heavily on the physical aperture ring for their shooting style might also want to pass. The missing ring on the X-mount version is a genuine annoyance if you're used to adjusting aperture by feel. In that case, Fuji's own XF 16-55mm f/2.8, while pricier and unstabilized, keeps the traditional control scheme intact. And if you're on a body with excellent IBIS and you value portability above all else, the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 is a lighter, smaller alternative that still delivers great image quality.
Verdict
If you're an APS-C shooter looking for one lens that can handle almost everything, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is the easy answer. It's sharp, stabilized, weather-sealed, and covers a range that means you'll rarely need to swap glass. For travel, family photos, and general walkaround use, it's basically the perfect companion. Video shooters will appreciate the silent autofocus and the AI-assisted stabilization that smooths out handheld footage better than most lenses in this class.
But it's not for everyone. If you're primarily a street photographer who values discretion and lightweight kit, the size and weight might annoy you. Our data shows street photography is its weakest area, scoring just 76.5 out of 100. For that use case, a compact prime or the smaller Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 would serve you better. And if you're a Fujifilm purist who can't live without an aperture ring, the missing physical control might be a dealbreaker. For everyone else, this lens is about as close to a no-brainer as it gets.