JVC Flats HAS160B

★★★★☆ 4.4 (11,401)

Son design plat pliable et son poids plume de 66g en font un casque extrêmement portable qui se glisse sans encombre dans un sac. Le cadre en acier inoxydable réglable et les coussinets souples offrent une durabilité et un confort d'isolation phonique passive pour une utilisation prolongée. Ce casque est idéal pour les étudiants ou les navetteurs soucieux de leur budget qui recherchent un casque filaire basique et robuste pour la musique et les appels occasionnels.

form factor on-ear
driver type dynamic
driver size mm 30
impedance ohms 32
open closed back closed
JVC Flats HAS160B headphones
59 Score global
Aussi disponible dans:

Aperçu

Avantages et inconvénients

Points forts

  • Strong build (97th percentile) 97th
  • Strong comfort (91st percentile) 91st
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile) 83rd
  • Strong user sentiment (70th percentile) 70th

Points faibles

  • Below average mic (21st percentile)

L'avis des propriétaires

L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps

Exclusivité

D'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.

L'avis des propriétaires s'est refroidi depuis la sortie
85/100Notre analyse IA du ressenticonfiance faible · 8 sources · mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '09: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ2 '09: 4.5★ · 4 avisQ3 '09: 3.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '09: 4.6★ · 5 avisQ1 '10: 4.6★ · 5 avisQ2 '10: 4.6★ · 7 avisQ3 '10: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '10: 5.0★ · 3 avisQ1 '11: 4.8★ · 9 avisQ2 '11: 4.8★ · 6 avisQ3 '11: 4.0★ · 12 avisQ4 '11: 4.0★ · 3 avisQ1 '12: 4.5★ · 2 avisQ2 '12: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '12: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '13: 4.3★ · 3 avisQ2 '13: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ3 '13: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '13: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ3 '23: 3.3★ · 4 avisQ4 '23: 4.6★ · 5 avisQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 4 avisQ2 '24: 4.5★ · 4 avisQ1 '25: 4.5★ · 2 avisQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '26: 4.0★ · 1 avis2415571396123211321124544211Q1 '09Q4 '09Q3 '10Q2 '11Q1 '12Q1 '13Q4 '13Q4 '23Q1 '25Q1 '26
Note moyenneSatisfaits (4-5★)Insatisfaits (1-2★)Hauteur des barres = nombre d'avis
  1. Q2 202485/1004.5★4 avis

    Buyers praised sound quality, comfort, and value. One reviewer found them tight and uncomfortable.

    • Great sound quality for the price
    • Comfortable and lightweight for extended wear
    • Fold flat design for easy storage
    • Too tight on ears, causing discomfort
  2. Q1 2024100/1005.0★4 avis

    Buyers praised the headphones for their lightweight design, premium sound quality, rich bass, and good value. They also noted a comfortable fit and sleek design.

    • Sound quality is premium with rich bass and excellent value.
    • Lightweight and comfortable fit on the head.
    • Sleek design and good build quality expected to last.
    • Low price combined with JVC quality and reliability.
  3. Q4 202388/1004.6★5 avis

    Buyers praised these headphones for comfort, especially with glasses, and for travel use. They are affordable and light, with good frequency response.

    • Comfortable for glasses wearers, not too tight.
    • Great for travel, easy to fold and carry.
    • Affordable and decent quality for the price.
    • Lightweight with good frequency response.
  4. Q3 202348/1003.3★4 avis

    Buyers found these headphones affordable and decent-sounding, but many reported discomfort and one unit broke the next day.

    • Headphones broke the next day for one buyer.
    • Ear cups too small, causing pain even for small ears.
    • Good value at $12.99, but headband pinches after extended wear.
    • Sound quality is fine with balanced bass for the price.
  5. Q1 201387/1004.3★3 avis

    Buyers praised the sound quality and lightweight design for the price, but noted a loose ear piece hinge and slightly small fit.

    • Great sound quality for the price, comparable to expensive models.
    • Lightweight and comfortable, not bulky on the head.
    • Ear pieces move freely when folded, raising durability concerns.
    • Slightly small fit on ears, but not a major issue.
  6. Q4 201173/1004.0★3 avis

    Buyers praised comfort, sound quality, and value, but noted average noise cancellation and uncertain long-term durability.

    • Great sound quality for the price.
    • Comfortable for daily use.
    • Noise cancellation is average for travel.
    • Durability uncertain after two months of use.
  7. Q3 201167/1004.0★12 avis

    Buyers praised the value and sound quality for the price, but some reported durability issues and comfort problems during extended use.

    • Excellent value and sound quality for the low price, especially for casual listening.
    • Some units broke quickly, with the headband-speaker connection being fragile.
    • Comfort is good initially but declines after a few hours; fit can be awkward.
    • Fold-flat design is convenient for travel and storage.
  8. Q2 201195/1004.8★6 avis

    Buyers praise these headphones for exceptional sound quality, comfort, and value at around $20, with minor concerns about headband padding and fit.

    • Excellent sound quality with balanced highs, lows, and mids, often compared favorably to pricier brands.
    • Very comfortable lightweight design with soft earpads, though some note headband padding could be improved.
    • Exceptional value for the price, considered unbeatable in its price range.
    • Durability is adequate for lightweight use; some mention potential breakage but accept it given low cost.
  9. Q1 201191/1004.8★9 avis

    Buyers praised the excellent comfort, noise isolation, and sound quality for the low price. Some noted crackling at high volume and on-ear sound leakage.

    • Excellent comfort for long wear, with good noise isolation.
    • Sound quality and bass are impressive for the $20 price point.
    • Some crackling and distortion at high volume with heavy music.
    • On-ear design causes sound leakage; others can hear your music.
  10. Q4 2010100/1005.0★3 avis

    All three reviews praise the headphones for excellent sound quality and value, with one buyer ordering additional pairs.

    • Sound quality rivals or exceeds more expensive brands like Bose.
    • Excellent value for the price, outperforming costlier alternatives.
    • No distortion even at high volumes, suitable for demanding use.
    • Comfortable fit and overall satisfaction, leading to repeat purchases.
  11. Q2 201080/1004.6★7 avis

    Buyers praised the sound quality and value for the price, but noted poor durability and a short cord.

    • Excellent sound quality with clear treble and good bass for the price.
    • Durability is poor; headphones break easily and require gentle handling.
    • Comfortable fit, even for larger heads, with adjustable and foldable design.
    • Short cord length is a drawback, but can be extended with an accessory.
  12. Q1 201084/1004.6★5 avis

    Buyers praised the clear, loud sound and value for the price, but noted comfort issues and limited noise cancellation.

    • Great sound quality with clear highs, lows, and mids, and very loud volume.
    • Excellent value for the price, often compared favorably to more expensive headphones.
    • Comfort is acceptable for a few hours but could be better.
    • Noise cancellation is weaker than expected.
  13. Q4 200988/1004.6★5 avis

    Buyers praised the clear sound and strong bass, but noted the headphones do not fold flat and have a very short cord.

    • Excellent sound quality with clear treble, mids, and powerful bass.
    • Great value for the price, especially for gym or casual use.
    • Headphones do not fold; speakers only rotate, limiting portability.
    • Cord is very short and feels fragile, prone to pulling or damage.
  14. Q2 200975/1004.5★4 avis

    Buyers praised sound quality and value, but a recurring reliability issue with shorting out was noted.

    • Excellent sound quality for the price, especially with metal/rock music.
    • Great value at $20, with comfort and noise isolation praised.
    • One side shorts out within months; second pair failed, requiring refund.
    • Plastic build feels weak; careful storage needed to avoid breakage.

D'après 92 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.

Les preuves

Performances

Percentiles de performance

Anc 69.3
Mic 20.6
Build 97.3
Sound 64.7
Battery 52.6
Comfort 91
User Sentiment 70.4
Connectivity 67
Preuve sociale 83.2

Caractéristiques techniques

Fiche technique complète

Design

Form Factor on-ear
Open/Closed closed
Foldable Yes
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.1 lbs
Headband Stainless Steel

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 30
Drivers 1
Freq Min 12
Freq Max 24000
Impedance 32
Hi-Res Audio No
Codecs Foldable, Lightweight, ios-phone-control
Surround JVC Flats On-Ear Wired Headphones - Flat Foldable Design - 30mm Driver for Powerful Sound - Soft Ear-Pads for Comfort – Steel Headband - Lightweight & Portable - PC/Laptop/Gaming - 3.5mm Slim Plug | J

Noise Control

ANC No
Transparency Yes

Connectivity

Wireless No
Multipoint No
Wired Connector 3.5mm
Detachable Cable No
Cable Length 1.2

Microphone

Microphone No
NC Mic No
Boom Mic No
Detachable Mic No

Features

Touch Controls No
App iOS
Gaming Mode Yes
Water Resistance Water-Resistant

Face à la concurrence

Spec JVC Flats HAS160B Sennheiser HDB 630 Sony ULT WEAR WHULT900N/B Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 Apple AirPods Max Midnight Technics EAH-A800
Form Factor on-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Driver Size (mm) 30 42 40 40 40 40
Impedance Ohms 32 480 314 - 16 34
Wireless false true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation false true true true true true
Open Closed Back closed closed closed closed closed closed
Bluetooth Version - 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.0 5.2
Battery Life Hours - 60 30 30 20 50
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityPreuve sociale
JVC Flats HAS160B 69.320.697.364.752.69170.46783.2
Sennheiser HDB 630 Compare 98.589.481.598.893.155.686.895.689.4
Sony ULT WEAR WHULT900N/B Compare 98.589.481.596.982.162.170.499.289.4
Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 Compare 98.599.596.399.682.162.186.898.398.7
Apple AirPods Max Midnight Compare 98.587.993.895.177.534.986.89698.7
Technics EAH-A800 Compare 95.298.881.59889.462.15398.165.5

Scores par usage

Work (42.8)Calls (30)Music (53)Global (58.5)Budget (66.9)Jeux (48.3)Studio (52.6)Commute (50.2)

Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.

Produits similaires