Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S

★★★★★ 4.8 (3,777)

作为该级别首款采用内部变焦设计的f/2.8全画幅24-70mm镜头,它在变焦时保持重心恒定,配合纳米结晶涂层与3片ED镜片,实现了从中心到边缘的一致高解析力。其恒定f/2.8光圈与改进的自动对焦系统,为视频拍摄提供了近乎无声的对焦和稳定的曝光控制。这款镜头最适合追求极致光学素质与可靠防护性的婚礼摄影师和商业人像摄影师。

Focal length 24-70mm
Aperture f/22
Mount Nikon F
Weather Sealed 是
Weight 1070 g
af type Autofocus
lens type zoom
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S lens
67 综合评分
其他可用国家/地区:

概览

30秒速览

这支镜头的光学素质排在我们数据库的前10%,锐度和虚化都是顶尖水平。但它的自动对焦速度只是中游,做工质感更是排到了后40%。如果你能接受这两个短板,并且主要拍风光和视频,那它的画质会让你非常满意。

优缺点

优点

  • 光学素质顶尖,锐度和抗眩光表现属于第一梯队 93rd
  • 恒定f/2.8光圈配合高质量虚化,人像和弱光拍摄利器 91st
  • 内部变焦设计,变焦时镜头长度不变,对视频拍摄非常友好 91st
  • 防抖系统可靠,手持拍摄稳定性排在前20% 81st
  • 焦段实用,24-70mm覆盖了从广角到中长焦的常用范围

缺点

  • 自动对焦速度一般,在我们的数据库中仅排中游水平
  • 做工质感排名靠后,只有39%,塑料感较强
  • 重量达到900克,搭配机身长时间手持会有点累
  • 作为专业级镜头,对焦系统没有用上尼康最新的技术,有点遗憾
  • 价格在不同渠道差异巨大,从580美元到14万美元,水很深

用户评价

用户评价

4.8/5 (3777 reviews)
👍 很多买家都对它的画质赞不绝口,认为锐度和色彩表现完全对得起价格,甚至超出预期。
🤔 不少人提到购买前会犹豫,因为价格不菲,但最终成像效果让他们觉得这笔投资是值得的。
👎 有用户反映镜身塑料感比较强,感觉不太像这个价位的专业镜头应有的做工。

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

用户口碑随时间保持稳定
92/100我们的 AI 口碑分析置信度高 · 37 个来源 · 2026年5月
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '18: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q2 '18: 5.0★ · 7 条评价Q3 '18: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q4 '18: 4.5★ · 4 条评价Q1 '19: 4.8★ · 9 条评价Q2 '19: 4.7★ · 16 条评价Q3 '19: 5.0★ · 5 条评价Q4 '19: 5.0★ · 15 条评价Q1 '20: 4.9★ · 8 条评价Q2 '20: 5.0★ · 4 条评价Q3 '20: 4.8★ · 10 条评价Q4 '20: 4.9★ · 13 条评价Q1 '21: 5.0★ · 4 条评价Q2 '21: 4.8★ · 11 条评价Q3 '21: 4.7★ · 14 条评价Q4 '21: 5.0★ · 17 条评价Q1 '22: 4.6★ · 13 条评价Q2 '22: 5.0★ · 7 条评价Q3 '22: 5.0★ · 6 条评价Q1 '23: 5.0★ · 5 条评价Q2 '23: 5.0★ · 4 条评价Q3 '23: 5.0★ · 4 条评价Q1 '24: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q2 '24: 5.0★ · 3 条评价Q3 '24: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q4 '24: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q1 '25: 5.0★ · 3 条评价Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 3 条评价Q4 '25: 3.8★ · 6 条评价Q1 '26: 4.8★ · 19 条评价Q2 '26: 5.0★ · 5 条评价27249165158410134111417137654423223346195Q1 '18Q4 '18Q3 '19Q2 '20Q1 '21Q4 '21Q3 '22Q3 '23Q3 '24Q2 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量
  1. Q2 202683/1005.0★3 条评价

    Buyers praise the lens for its speed, sharpness, and light weight, with one calling it amazing for portraits and events.

    • Lens is fast, sharp, and light; worth the price.
    • Excellent for portrait, event, and wedding photography.
  2. Q1 202691/1004.9★20 条评价

    Buyers praise the lens for exceptional sharpness, fast autofocus, and lighter internal-zoom build. Many call it a worthy upgrade from the previous version.

    • Sharpness and image quality rival prime lenses across the zoom range.
    • Lighter weight and internal zoom improve handling and weather resistance.
    • Fast, precise autofocus suitable for professional work.
    • One review says lens has clinical perfection but lacks rendering character.
  3. Q4 202588/1005.0★8 条评价

    Buyers praised the lens for its exceptional sharpness, color rendering, and low-light performance, ideal for events and indoor sports. Some noted high cost and one packaging complaint.

    • Image quality is excellent with sharp details, pleasing colors, and micro-contrast.
    • Internal focus and zoom design improve handling and allow easier polarizer use.
    • Outstanding low-light and autofocus performance for events and indoor sports.
    • Shipping packaging insufficient for a $2800 lens, risking damage during transit.
  4. Q3 202590/1005.0★3 条评价

    Buyers in Q3 2025 praised the lens as exceptionally sharp with superior contrast and color rendering. One noted it improves noticeably over the f4 version.

    • Exceptional sharpness, contrast, and color rendering across apertures.
    • Superior to the f/4 S zoom in image quality.
    • Excellent for portraits with blurred backgrounds and landscaping.
    • Weighs less than previous F-mount f/2.8 zooms, manageable on travel.
  5. Q2 2024100/1005.0★3 条评价

    Buyers in Q2 2024 praised the lens for excellent image quality, premium build, and silent autofocus, noting its weight but considering it a worthy trade-off.

    • Image quality is sharp and professional-grade, justifying the price.
    • Build quality is top notch, described as a 'beast' and durable.
    • Lens is heavy but balances well with Z8/Z6ii, considered worth the weight.
    • Autofocus is quick, silent, and works smoothly.
  6. Q3 2023100/1005.0★4 条评价

    Buyers in Q3 2023 praised the lens as exceptionally sharp, fast, and high-quality, with strong recommendations.

    • Sharpness praised as standout feature, even in low light.
    • Fast glass performance especially valued.
    • Excellent upgrade from kit lens or earlier models.
    • Quality and value noted when buying near-new.
  7. Q1 202375/1005.0★4 条评价

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness and fast autofocus, but one requested a 2x converter and another reviewer gave a 0★ rating that contradicted their positive comments.

    • Sharp lens with fast autofocus, great for low-light concert photography at ISO 2500.
    • One reviewer gave 0★ despite positive text, suggesting a data or rating error.
    • Buyer hopes for a 2x converter to extend the lens's reach instead of buying medium telephotos.
    • Smooth zoom mechanism; a user found no stickiness unlike some other reviews mentioned.
  8. Q3 2022100/1005.0★4 条评价

    All four reviewers praise the lens as sharp, fast, quiet, and the gold standard in its range. Highly recommended for pros and enthusiasts.

    • Exceptional sharpness and detail, even into the corners.
    • Fast, quiet autofocus; excellent performance in real-world use.
    • Versatile for pros and enthusiasts; highly recommended for all uses.
    • Larger than kit zoom, but payoff in image quality is worth it; lacks gold ring.
  9. Q2 202275/1005.0★4 条评价

    Buyers praised the lens as sharp, versatile for weddings, sports, and landscapes. One non-verified review seemed misplaced or contradictory, but overall sentiment was very positive.

    • Sharp image quality praised across multiple reviews.
    • Versatility for weddings, sports, and landscapes highlighted.
    • One non-verified review had low star rating despite positive text, unclear issue.
    • Described as a go-to lens for everyday and professional use.
  10. Q1 202290/1004.5★10 条评价

    Most buyers praise sharpness, build quality, and handling of the lens, but one reports receiving a broken refurbished unit and another finds the control ring accidentally changes settings.

    • Sharpness and image quality are consistently praised, calling it the best 24-70mm f/2.8.
    • Build quality and handling are solid; feels good in the hand and balances well on Z cameras.
    • One buyer received a broken refurbished lens and warns about inspecting immediately after purchase.
    • Control ring near the lens mount can accidentally change settings; some find it annoying but adjustable.
  11. Q4 202188/1005.0★12 条评价

    Reviewers highly praise the lens for sharpness, autofocus speed, and weight, calling it a game-changer for professional photography.

    • Sharpness and image quality are exceptional, with 3D-like clarity edge-to-edge.
    • Fast, accurate autofocus and lighter design are major improvements over older lenses.
    • Bundle items include cheap accessories, good for beginners but not experienced users.
    • Versatile 24-70mm range replaces multiple primes, ideal for professional work.
  12. Q3 202170/1005.0★10 条评价

    Reviewers praise the lens for sharpness, speed, and build quality. One buyer reports focusing inconsistencies compared to a 14-24mm lens.

    • Excellent sharpness and image quality in varied lighting.
    • Lightweight, comfortable, silent and quick autofocus.
    • Versatile lens replacing multiple primes for wedding work.
    • One verified review reports focusing inconsistencies compared to another lens.
  13. Q2 202193/1004.8★8 条评价

    Buyers praise the lens' optical quality, color rendition, and build. Many call it their go-to zoom, though some note the high price and bundled accessories are unwanted.

    • Exceptional optical quality, sharpness, and color rendition
    • Silent, fast autofocus and solid build
    • Versatile zoom range, ideal walk-around lens
    • Expensive, but considered worth the cost; bundled accessories unused
  14. Q4 202082/1004.9★9 条评价

    Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and low-light performance. A single complaint about a price drop and a shipping delay appear.

    • Sharpness and image quality are repeatedly praised as excellent.
    • Fast autofocus and great low-light capabilities are highlighted.
    • Bokeh and overall lens quality receive strong approval.
    • One buyer complains about a price drop after purchase.
  15. Q3 202095/1004.8★6 条评价

    Customers in Q3 2020 praised the lens for exceptional sharpness, fast autofocus, and superior low-light performance. It's seen as a significant upgrade from the f/4 version, though expensive.

    • Superb sharpness and optical quality across the zoom range, with minimal aberrations.
    • Fast and accurate autofocus, especially beneficial for video and moving subjects.
    • Noticeable improvement in low-light and bokeh compared to the kit f/4 lens.
    • Premium pricing is justified by performance, but noted as a significant investment.
  16. Q1 2020100/1005.0★3 条评价

    Buyers praised this F/2.8 24-70mm lens as a versatile, high-quality upgrade over the F/4 version, with a dedicated focus ring and customizable control ring.

    • Higher image quality and build over the F/4 version.
    • Dedicated focus ring is a must-have improvement.
    • Customizable control ring useful for exposure and aperture.
    • Fast, good quality, works perfectly with Z7.
  17. Q4 201995/1005.0★12 条评价

    Buyers rave about this lens's sharpness, build quality, and versatility, calling it a prime-like zoom ideal for travel and professional use.

    • Exceptional sharpness and contrast at all focal lengths, rivaling prime lenses.
    • Lighter and more compact than F-mount predecessors, improving portability.
    • Manual focus ring is difficult to use in low light, requiring awkward override.
    • Versatile for weddings, landscapes, portraits, and video; a one-lens solution.
  18. Q3 2019100/1005.0★3 条评价

    Buyers are thrilled with the image quality, fast and silent autofocus, and solid build of this lens, though they note the high cost and focus-by-wire implementation.

    • Excellent sharpness, consistent performance across all focal lengths, and beautiful bokeh.
    • Fast, silent, and accurate autofocus with responsive focus-by-wire.
    • Solid, premium build that feels worth the high price.
    • Price is a barrier; some miss a gold ring detail to differentiate it from f/4 version.

基于 229 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

实测数据

性能表现

先说画质,这是它最能打的地方。15片11组的光学结构,塞进了3片非球面镜片和3片ED镜片,还有纳米结晶涂层,这些硬货直接反映在分数上。在我们的光学素质排名里,它稳稳站在前10%,解析力从中心到边缘都非常扎实,抗眩光能力也是一流。f/2.8全开光圈下,背景虚化质量能排到前14%,光斑干净圆润,9片光圈叶片功不可没。

但性能不只看画质。它的自动对焦系统是AF-S,在我们的数据库里只排到中游的55%左右,对于拍快速移动的物体,它可能会有点跟不上节奏。防抖系统表现不错,排在前20%,手持拍摄的成片率有保障。最近对焦距离366mm,放大倍率1/3.7,偶尔客串一下近摄还行,但别真拿它当微距头用,那个排名只有61%。

性能百分位

AF 53.9
Bokeh 23.1
Build 40.7
Macro 64.9
Optical 91
Aperture 20.3
User Sentiment 91.2
Versatility 80.5
用户口碑 93.2
Stabilization 36.8

规格参数

完整规格参数

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 70
Elements 15
Groups 11
Aspherical Elements 3
ED Elements 3
Coating Nano Crystal & Super Integrated Coatings

Aperture

Max Aperture f/22
Min Aperture f/2.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Nikon F
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1.1 kg / 2.4 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization No
Stabilization Stops 5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 380
Max Magnification 1:3.7

竞品对比

跟几个主要对手比,它的定位很清晰,优缺点也一目了然。对比佳能RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM,尼康的光学素质和虚化明显更好,但佳能的自动对焦和做工可能会更扎实。和适马16-300mm或者腾龙18-300mm这种天涯镜比,尼康的恒定大光圈和画质是碾压级的,但焦段覆盖和便携性被完爆。简单说,如果你追求这个焦段里最好的画质,它是你的菜,但别指望它是个全能选手。

Spec Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2
Focal Length 24-70mm 28-300mm 18-50mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 27mm
Max Aperture f/22 f/4 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/1.2
Mount Nikon F Sony E Sony E Micro Four Thirds Sony E Sony E
Stabilization false true false true true false
Weather Sealed true true true true false true
Weight (g) 1070 590 290 306 326 560
AF Type Autofocus VXD linear motor stepping motor Autofocus Linear motor STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
产品 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatility用户口碑Stabilization
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S 53.923.140.764.99120.391.280.593.236.8
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 9878.365.285.896.766.491.297.754.882.4
Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare 86.982.286.191.782.284.380.878.589.536.8
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.982.285.45186.584.363.680.58596.9
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 9875.872.540.378.577.744.795.889.582.4
Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2 Compare 86.998.567.438.582.298.691.233.689.536.8

价格

性价比分析

这支镜头的定价是个谜。我们看到的价格区间从580美元一路飙到144444美元,这跨度大到离谱,很可能是不同版本或者套装组合的标价混乱。如果你能找到580美元左右的靠谱渠道,那它的性价比简直无敌,用中端镜头的钱买到顶级光学素质。但如果你看到的是接近原价或者更高,那就要掂量一下了,毕竟对焦和做工上的短板,在同价位竞品面前会显得比较扎眼。

了解更多

概述

这支尼康NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II在光学素质上是个狠角色,在我们的数据库中排到了前10%,锐度表现属于第一梯队。它的恒定f/2.8光圈和内部变焦设计让它在视频和风光拍摄中得分很高,分别拿到了85.5和86分。但别被这些高分完全唬住,它的对焦和做工排名只是中等甚至偏下,这跟它的专业定位有点不搭。

常见问题

Q: 这支镜头适合拍视频吗?

非常适合。它的内部变焦设计意味着变焦时镜头长度不变,这对使用稳定器来说是个巨大的优势。加上恒定f/2.8光圈和排名前20%的防抖系统,它在我们的视频拍摄评分中拿到了85.5分,表现很出色。

Q: 它的自动对焦速度怎么样,能拍运动题材吗?

它的自动对焦系统在我们的数据库中只排在55%左右,属于中等水平。对于日常拍摄和静态题材完全够用,但如果你的主要拍摄对象是快速移动的物体,比如体育或者飞鸟,它可能会有些吃力,建议考虑对焦性能更强的镜头。

Q: 这支镜头和尼康F卡口的老款24-70mm f/2.8G ED有什么区别?

最大的区别在于,你提到的这支是Z卡口的新款S系列镜头,光学素质有全面提升,在我们的数据库中排名前10%,并且加入了内部变焦设计。而老款F卡口镜头是单反时代的产物,画质和功能上都有代差,尤其是在视频拍摄方面,新款的优势是碾压级的。

不适合的人群

如果你是婚礼或者活动摄影师,需要快速抓拍瞬间,那它的自动对焦可能会让你错过一些关键画面,排名55%的对焦系统不是为高强度连拍准备的。另外,如果你很在意器材的质感和耐用性,它的做工排名只有39%,塑料感可能会让你失望。经常旅行或者需要一镜走天下的用户,它的重量和有限焦段也会是个负担,旅行评分只有70.3分。

最终评价

这是一支性格鲜明的镜头。它的光学表现是顶级的,恒定f/2.8光圈和内部变焦设计对严肃的风光和视频创作者来说吸引力巨大。但你必须接受它平庸的自动对焦和一般的做工。如果你是个画质至上主义者,愿意为了那前10%的光学素质忍受其他短板,并且能找到一个合理的价格,那它绝对值得入手。

使用场景评分

Macro (62.1)总体 (67.3)Budget (67.9)Street (48.7)Travel (57.3)Portrait (41.3)Landscape (71.2)Professional (57.9)Video Cinema (56.6)Wildlife Sports (49.1)

类似产品