DAKboard CPU v4 4-core BGA

★★★★★ 5.0 (4)

A quad-core Cortex-A72 SoC drives 4K output for crisp calendar and photo displays, housed in an aluminum case with a built-in heat sink for sustained use. It connects to any HDMI monitor or TV and syncs with Google Calendar, iCloud, and Trello without coding, making setup a plug-and-play process. This device is best for families wanting a centralized, wall-mounted organizer that pulls in schedules, to-dos, and photo feeds from multiple services.

Cores 4
Socket BGA
DAKboard CPU v4 4-core BGA cpu
14 Totaalscore

Geen actuele winkelprijs

Ook beschikbaar in:

Overzicht

The 30-Second Version

The DAKboard CPU v4 is a Raspberry Pi 4B in a nice aluminum case, built to turn any HDMI screen into a family dashboard. It's plug-and-play with DAKboard OS pre-installed, but the underlying hardware is aging, with multi-thread performance at the 10th percentile and efficiency at the 9th. At $170 USD, it's a fair deal for calendar and photo display duty, just don't expect it to do much else.

Pros & Cons

Pluspunten

  • Plug-and-play setup with DAKboard OS pre-installed on micro SD
  • Universal HDMI compatibility with any monitor or TV
  • Aluminum case with integrated heatsink for passive cooling
  • Dual networking with WiFi and ethernet
  • Includes 1-month Essential or Plus subscription

Minpunten

  • Multi-thread performance at the 10th percentile
  • Efficiency score of 9 out of 100
  • AI capabilities nearly nonexistent at 7.7 out of 100
  • Feature set ranks in the bottom quarter at the 21st percentile
  • Only 4 customer reviews, so long-term reliability is unclear

De feiten

Performance

The Cortex-A72 quad-core at 1.8GHz is fine for what this does. Calendar syncing, photo slideshows, weather widgets, maybe a video block or two. That's the sweet spot. Single-thread performance lands at the 17th percentile, and multi-thread is even lower at the 10th. So no, you're not transcoding video or running local AI models on this thing. The AI score of 7.7 out of 100 is one of the worst we've seen in this category.

But here's the thing. DAKboard's whole pitch is that this is a display driver, not a compute engine. The 4K output is handled by the Pi's hardware decoder, which is actually decent for static content and light video. The aluminum case has an integrated heatsink, which helps with sustained loads. Just don't expect it to stay cool if you're running demanding screen loops all day. Efficiency sits at the 9th percentile, so it's not exactly sipping power either.

Performance Percentiles

AI 8.7
Feature 20.7
Platform 17.4
Efficiency 8.7
Multi Thread 10
Gebruikersoordeel 58.8
Affordability 50.5
Single Thread 16.9

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Series Cortex
Class desktop

Cores & Clocks

Cores 4
Base Clock 1800

Platform & Power

Socket BGA

vs Competition

Stacking this against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D or Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is like comparing a bicycle to a fighter jet. Those chips are in a completely different universe for compute power. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D would absolutely demolish this in any benchmark you throw at it, but it also costs several times more and needs a full PC build. The D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X is similarly overkill for displaying a Google Calendar. The G.Skill Trident Z Neo is RAM, not a CPU, so that's not even a fair fight. The MICRO CENTER 225FB860MEAGLEPL is a motherboard bundle, again a different product category. The real comparison is against other single-board computers and smart display solutions. Against those, the DAKboard CPU v4 is competitive on ease of use but falls behind on raw performance and flexibility.

Spec DAKboard CPU v4 AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Intel Core Ultra 9 285K SMC EPYC 9555P HP Xeon 6526Y CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor
Cores 4 8 24 64 16 24
Threads - 16 24 128 32 48
Boost Clock Mhz - 5200 5700 4400 3900 4000
L3 Cache Mb - 96 36 256 37 128
Tdp W - 120 125 360 195 200
Socket BGA AM5 LGA 1851 AMD Socket SP5 LGA 4677 AMD Socket SP3
Integrated Graphics - AMD Radeon Intel Graphics - No -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadGebruikersoordeelAffordabilitySingle Thread
DAKboard CPU v4 8.720.717.48.71058.850.516.9
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.698.595.288.889.296.423.795.1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.99697.296.490.318.399.9
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.496.789.799.400.485.9
HP Xeon 6526Y Compare 92.177.490.879.389.902.780.6
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare 94.877.484.585.193.936.35.380.4

Prijs

Value & Pricing

At $170 USD, you're paying a premium for convenience. A bare Raspberry Pi 4B costs less, but then you're sourcing a case, flashing an SD card, and troubleshooting your own setup. The DAKboard CPU v4 bundles all that into a tidy package with a month of their subscription service thrown in. The affordability score sits right at the 50th percentile, so it's neither a bargain nor a rip-off. European buyers get hit harder, with prices ranging from 287 to 305 EUR. That's a significant markup for the same hardware, and it makes the value proposition shakier across the pond.

Lees meer

Overview

The DAKboard CPU v4 is a Raspberry Pi 4B in a nice aluminum case, and that's basically the whole story. It's a 4-core Cortex-A72 running at 1.8GHz, built to turn any HDMI screen into a family calendar, photo frame, or dashboard. The 4K output claim is real, but don't expect this thing to push pixels like a desktop. It's a wall calendar brain, not a workstation.

Our database puts this at the 21st percentile for features and 17th for platform. That sounds rough, but context matters. This isn't competing with Ryzen chips. It's competing with sticky notes and fridge magnets. For $170 USD, you get a plug-and-play device with DAKboard OS pre-installed, WiFi and ethernet, and a one-month subscription to Essential or Plus. The 5/5 rating from 4 reviews is nice, but with that sample size, we're not throwing a parade.

Common Questions

Q: Can the DAKboard CPU v4 handle 4K video playback?

The Cortex-A72 SoC supports 4K output via HDMI, and the hardware decoder can handle 4K video playback. However, with multi-thread performance at the 10th percentile, don't expect smooth 4K video alongside multiple other tasks. It's best suited for static content, photos, and light video blocks.

Q: How does the DAKboard CPU v4 compare to a regular Raspberry Pi 4?

It is a Raspberry Pi 4B inside. The DAKboard CPU v4 adds an aluminum case with integrated heatsink, a pre-installed micro SD card with DAKboard OS, and a one-month subscription to Essential or Plus. You're paying for the packaging and setup convenience, not for upgraded hardware.

Q: Is the DAKboard CPU v4 good for gaming or heavy applications?

No. The gaming score is 13.9 out of 100, and the total score is 13.6 out of 100. The 4-core Cortex-A72 at 1.8GHz is designed for dashboard and display duty, not gaming or compute-heavy workloads. The AI score of 7.7 out of 100 confirms this isn't a device for local machine learning tasks.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you want a general-purpose computer or anything resembling a performance device. The 13.9 out of 100 gaming score and 7.7 out of 100 AI score tell the story. If you're comfortable flashing your own SD card and don't mind a plastic case, buy a bare Raspberry Pi 4B and save money. European buyers should think twice, since the 287 to 305 EUR price range is a steep markup over the $170 USD listing. And if you need something that can handle multiple demanding tasks simultaneously, the 10th percentile multi-thread performance will frustrate you quickly.

Verdict

If you want a wall-mounted family calendar that just works, the DAKboard CPU v4 delivers. The setup is genuinely painless, the aluminum case looks better than a bare Pi, and the included subscription gets you started immediately. But you're paying for that convenience. The hardware underneath is a Raspberry Pi 4B, which is aging. The 10th percentile multi-thread score and 9th percentile efficiency mean this isn't a device you'll be pushing hard. For $170 USD, it's a reasonable buy for the right use case. For anything beyond displaying calendars, photos, and light video, look elsewhere.

Usage Scores

Algemeen (13.6)AI/LLM (7.8)Budget (26.7)Gaming (14)Server (8.8)Efficiency (10.5)Productivity (12.5)

Vergelijkbare producten