Sigma Contemporary 415965 17mm
Weighing just 227g and measuring 2.5 inches long, this full-frame 17mm f/4 prime delivers a 104° angle of view in an all-metal, weather-sealed body that disappears into a jacket pocket. Its 1:3.57 maximum magnification and 119mm minimum focus distance enable close-up wide-angle shots rarely possible at this focal length. This lens is best for travel photographers and vloggers who need an ultra-compact, durable wide-angle prime for everyday shooting without the burden of heavy gear.
요약
The 30-Second Version
A stunningly well-built, compact 17mm prime with surprising macro chops. Its f/4 aperture is the main sacrifice for that tiny size. If you find it at the lower end of its price range, it's a no-brainer for wide-angle fans who prioritize portability.
Pros & Cons
장점
- Build quality is outstanding, all metal and weather-sealed. 92nd
- Shockingly good close-up performance for an ultra-wide. 91st
- Tiny and light at 220g, it disappears in your bag. 74th
- Sharp optics and well-controlled distortion for architecture.
단점
- f/4 max aperture limits low-light shooting and shallow depth of field.
- No optical stabilization.
- Price fluctuates wildly from $520 to $895 depending on the seller.
- Not the lens for creamy bokeh, it's just not its thing.
사용자 의견
The Word on the Street
시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가
독점고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.
날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 6건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.
근거 자료
Performance
Sharpness is solid, landing in the 74th percentile for optical quality. The real surprise is how close you can get. A 120mm minimum focus distance and 1:3.57 magnification put its macro ability in the 91st percentile, meaning you can get creative with wide-angle close-ups that show a ton of context. Autofocus is quick and internal, which is fine for most uses, though it's nothing to brag about at the 54th percentile. The big compromise is aperture. At f/4, you're giving up light and subject isolation. Bokeh is a weak point, and in low light, you'll be cranking ISO or reaching for a tripod.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 |
| Focal Length Max | 17 |
| Elements | 9 |
| Groups | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 55 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 120 |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.57 |
vs Competition
The Sigma lives in an odd space. It's a prime for people who usually shoot zooms like the Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS or the longer Tamron 28-300mm, but want something smaller and sharper for wide scenes. The Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is a zoom and a full stop faster, but it's massive by comparison. Meanwhile, the Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 is a heavyweight champ for bokeh and light gathering, but it's also three times heavier and nowhere near as wide. The Sigma is all about trading speed for size.
| Spec | Sigma Contemporary 415965 17mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 17mm | 17-70mm | 17-28mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm | 27mm |
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/1.2 |
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | true | false | true | true | false |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 220 | 544 | 450 | 306 | 326 | 560 |
| AF Type | Auto Focus | RXD | Stepping Motor | Autofocus | Linear motor | STM |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | prime |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 제품 | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | 사용자 평판 | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma Contemporary 415965 17mm | 53.7 | 13 | 91.2 | 91.7 | 74.3 | 19.8 | 33.7 | 20.5 | 36.7 |
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare | 53.7 | 86.4 | 69 | 85.5 | 91.2 | 83.3 | 89.6 | 86 | 82.4 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 86.8 | 86.4 | 75.6 | 85.5 | 88.3 | 83.3 | 68.1 | 70.8 | 36.7 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.7 | 81.1 | 85.7 | 50.7 | 86.6 | 83.3 | 80.6 | 86 | 96.9 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 98 | 74.6 | 72.9 | 40.3 | 78.7 | 76.6 | 95.8 | 90.2 | 82.4 |
| Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2 Compare | 86.8 | 98.4 | 67.8 | 38.5 | 82.4 | 98.6 | 33.7 | 90.2 | 36.7 |
가격
Value & Pricing
Pricing on this lens is a roller coaster. We saw it listed everywhere from $520 to $895 across vendors, with some bundles running higher. At the low end, it's a fantastic deal for a compact, beautifully built prime. At $895, you're inching into used Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 territory and the value proposition starts to fall apart. Definitely shop around before you click buy.
더 보기
Overview
Sigma's I Series lenses have a knack for feeling like premium gear you actually want to carry, and the 17mm f/4 DG DN Contemporary keeps that streak alive. It's tiny, made of metal, and gives you a seriously wide field of view on full-frame Sony E or L-mount bodies. Think tight interiors, sprawling landscapes, or architecture shots where you need to fit everything in the frame.
Common Questions
Q: Will this lens work for astrophotography?
It can in a pinch, but f/4 isn't ideal for capturing stars without really pushing your ISO or using a star tracker. You'll capture wide swaths of the sky, just don't expect the brightest pinpoint stars without noise.
Q: Is it worth getting this over a wide-angle zoom?
Only if you value the tiny size and metal build over versatility. A zoom would give you more framing options, but the Sigma's prime design keeps it sharper and much more portable.
Who Should Skip This
If you regularly shoot in dimly lit venues, at night without a tripod, or need shallow depth of field for portraits, look elsewhere. The f/4 aperture puts too many limits on light and blur for those tasks. Astro shooters specifically should save up for a faster lens.
Verdict
This lens is for the photographer who values compactness and build quality above all else. It's a perfect travel companion for a Sony a7C or similar body where you want a pocketable ultra-wide for architecture, landscapes, and even close-ups. If you're okay with f/4, the sharpness and macro ability are a real treat.