AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X 64-core sTR5
The 64-core, 128-thread Threadripper 9980X leverages a 4nm process and 5.4GHz boost to deliver a 142,812 PassMark multi-core score for heavy rendering and simulation. Its quad-channel ECC DDR5 support and 88 PCIe 5.0 lanes provide uncompromised memory bandwidth and expansion for multi-GPU setups. This processor is best for AI developers and 3D artists running parallelized workloads who need workstation-class throughput without moving to a server platform.
현재 판매처 최신 가격 없음
요약
The 30-Second Version
The Threadripper 9980X is a 64-core beast that tops our multi-thread charts, but it's thirsty, hot, and needs a separate GPU. Buy it for serious workstation work, not for Roblox.
Pros & Cons
장점
- 64 cores and 128 threads, the absolute best multi-thread performance we've seen 100th
- 256MB L3 cache is massive for AI and rendering workloads 100th
- DDR5 with ECC support up to 1000GB, great for serious workstations 99th
- PCIe 5.0 and unlocked for overclocking, no artificial limits 98th
단점
- 350W TDP, 500W turbo, this thing drinks power like it's free
- No integrated graphics, you must buy a separate GPU
- No cooler in the box, budget for a serious cooling solution
- User sentiment is rough, 5th percentile, and there are fake chip reports floating around
사용자 의견
The Word on the Street
시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가
독점고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.
근거 자료
Performance
The multi-thread numbers are absurd. 142,812 in PassMark is best-in-class, and the single-thread score of 4,532 is also near the top, which is rare for a chip with this many cores. The 5.4GHz boost on a 64-core part is genuinely impressive. But the efficiency score of 41.8/100 tells the real story: 350W TDP with a 500W turbo mode means your power bill is going to feel it. You'll need serious cooling and a beefy PSU just to keep this thing fed.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Model | 9980X |
| Codename | Shimada Peak |
| Class | hedt |
| Process | 4 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 64 |
| P-cores | 64 |
| Threads | 128 |
| Base Clock | 3200 |
| Boost Clock | 5400 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 64 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 142812 |
| PassMark Single | 4532 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 6400 |
| Channels | 4 |
| Max Memory | 1000 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | sTR5 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 92 |
| TDP | 350 |
| Max Turbo Power | 500 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | No |
vs Competition
The Threadripper 9980X sits in a weird spot. Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, it's not even close in multi-thread, the 9980X destroys it, but the Intel chip is a fraction of the price and way more efficient. The HP Xeon P67080-B21 is a server part, so it's a different beast entirely, but if you need ECC and tons of cores in a rack, that's the comparison to make. For most people, the 9980X is overkill, but for the few who need 64 cores in a desktop, nothing else comes close.
| Spec | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | SMC EPYC 9555P | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | HP Xeon P67080-B21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 64 | 24 | 32 | 64 | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 128 | 24 | 64 | 128 | 48 | 32 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 5400 | 5700 | 3500 | 4400 | 4000 | 3900 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 256 | 256 | 128 | 37.5 |
| Tdp W | 350 | 125 | 200 | 360 | 200 | 195 |
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AMD Socket SP5 | AMD Socket SP3 | LGA 4677 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | No |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 제품 | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | 사용자 평판 | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | 99.7 | 98.5 | 98.2 | 5.2 | 92.3 | 99.8 | 5.8 | 96.3 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.8 | 95.9 | 78.7 | 97.1 | 96.7 | 90.4 | 99.8 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.7 | 76.3 | 0 | 97.4 | 99.2 | 0 | 89.4 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77 | 96.8 | 0 | 90.8 | 99.5 | 0 | 88.8 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 77 | 84.1 | 0 | 83.9 | 94.5 | 36.3 | 80.2 |
| HP Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.7 | 77 | 90.7 | 0 | 78.3 | 90.9 | 0 | 80.4 |
가격
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. In the US you're looking at USD 4,000 to USD 5,183 depending on the vendor, with Amazon and Newegg both listing it. That's a USD 1,183 spread, so shop around. In Europe it's EUR 5,130 to EUR 5,738, with the best EUR deal also at Amazon. For a 64-core workstation chip, the price is actually reasonable compared to what you'd pay for comparable server silicon, but the lack of a cooler and GPU means the real cost is higher than the sticker.
더 보기
Overview
The Threadripper 9980X is AMD's 64-core monster for people who actually need 128 threads. This is not a gaming chip, it's a workstation sledgehammer. The multi-thread score of 142,812 in PassMark puts it at the absolute top of our database, and the 256MB of L3 cache means heavy renders and AI workloads just chew through data. If you're compiling code, rendering 8K video, or running local LLMs, this thing is the current king of the hill.
Common Questions
Q: Do I need a separate graphics card with the 9980X?
Yes. There's no integrated GPU on this chip, so you'll need a dedicated graphics card just to get a display output. Budget for that.
Q: What kind of cooler do I need?
A serious one. The 9980X has a 350W TDP and can spike to 500W in turbo. You'll want a high-end air cooler or a 360mm AIO liquid cooler at minimum, and a case with excellent airflow.
Q: Is this good for gaming?
It'll game fine, but it's massive overkill. The single-thread performance is strong, but you're paying for 64 cores you won't use in games. Get a Ryzen 7 or 9 instead and spend the savings on a better GPU.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a gaming PC or a general-purpose desktop, skip this. You're paying for 64 cores you'll never use, and the power draw and cooling requirements are a headache. Get a Ryzen 7 9800X3D or a Core Ultra 9 285K instead and put the savings into a better GPU. This chip is for people who render, compile, or run AI workloads all day, not for Roblox sessions.
Verdict
If you need 64 cores and 128 threads in a desktop, buy this. It's the best multi-thread performer we've tested, and the platform is solid. But be ready to spend on a GPU, a serious cooler, and a power supply that can handle 500W spikes. And buy from a reputable vendor, because there are reports of fake chips with 9980X stickers on old 1950X silicon. That's a real problem.
