AMD A10 9700E 4-core AM4
The 35W TDP and integrated Radeon R7 Graphics on the AM4 socket provide a capable foundation for basic displays without a discrete GPU. Its low power draw and passive cooling potential make it a practical choice for always-on home servers or silent office PCs. This processor is best for users building a simple media center or a basic productivity machine on a strict power budget.
現在、販売店の最新価格はありません
概要
The 30-Second Version
The A10-9700E is a cool-running budget APU with a great AM4 upgrade path, but its 2MB L2 cache and weak single-thread performance hold it back hard. Feature-wise it's top-tier for the price, but raw speed is near the bottom of our charts. Worth it only if you need a new AM4 chip with integrated graphics and don't care about performance.
Pros & Cons
長所
- Runs cool even under sustained load 89th
- AM4 socket gives you a real upgrade path 74th
- Radeon R7 iGPU handles light gaming and basic display duties 73rd
- Dirt cheap and widely available
短所
- 2MB L2 cache cripples performance in cache-heavy tasks
- Single-thread and multi-thread scores are well below average
- Stock cooler gets whiny under load
- RAM compatibility is finicky, stick to 2400 MHz
オーナーの声
The Word on the Street
購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか
独自顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。
日付のある顧客レビュー 7 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。
実証データ
Performance
With a 3.0GHz base and 3.5GHz boost, the A10-9700E posts a PassMark of 3250 multi and 1511 single. That's enough for web browsing, office work, and light multitasking. The Radeon R7 iGPU handles older titles and indie games at low settings, and owners report it's fine for software development, including parallel Linux kernel compiles. The 2MB L2 cache is a real bottleneck though. Older APUs like Kaveri and Trinity had 4MB, and the cut here shows up in anything cache-hungry. The 35W TDP means it sips power and stays cool, which is the one performance-adjacent win worth mentioning.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | A10 |
| Model | 9700E |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 28 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 4 |
| Threads | 4 |
| Base Clock | 3000 |
| Boost Clock | 3500 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 2 |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 3250 |
| PassMark Single | 1511 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2400 |
| Channels | 3 |
Platform & Power
| Socket | AM4 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 |
| TDP | 35 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the A10-9700E is a niche pick. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is in a completely different universe performance-wise, but it's also a different price class and has no iGPU. The Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 is an old server chip that beats it in some multi-threaded workloads but lacks the AM4 upgrade path and integrated graphics. The Phenom II X6 is even older and slower per-core. Honestly, the real competitor here is a used Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 5 2400G, which offer better CPU and GPU performance on the same socket for similar money. The A10-9700E only makes sense if you specifically need a new-in-box AM4 APU at the absolute lowest price.
| Spec | AMD A10 9700E | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | SMC EPYC 9555P | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 24 | 32 | 64 | 18 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 | 64 | 128 | 36 | 32 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3500 | 5700 | 3500 | 4400 | 4400 | 3900 |
| L3 Cache Mb | - | 36 | 256 | 256 | 24.75 | 37.5 |
| Tdp W | 35 | 125 | 200 | 360 | 165 | 195 |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA2066 | LGA 4677 |
| Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | No |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 製品 | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | ユーザー評価 | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD A10 9700E | 28.4 | 89.1 | 73.6 | 50.1 | 53.3 | 29.2 | 72.9 | 60.9 | 34.8 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 95.9 | 78.1 | 97 | 96.2 | 90.4 | 18.5 | 99.9 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.9 | 76.4 | 0 | 97.4 | 99.1 | 0 | 88.3 | 88.7 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.1 | 96.8 | 0 | 88.9 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.2 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare | 97.3 | 62.6 | 82.5 | 0 | 99.4 | 99.8 | 72.4 | 7.8 | 95.7 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.8 | 77.1 | 90.7 | 0 | 78.1 | 89.4 | 0 | 2.7 | 79.7 |
価格
Value & Pricing
At around $128 USD or $119 CAD, the A10-9700E is a weird value proposition. For a brand new AM4 chip with an iGPU, it's not terrible. But you're paying for the socket and the integrated graphics, not the CPU performance. If you already have an AM4 board and just need something to boot it, this works. If you're building from scratch, you can often find used Ryzen 3 or even Ryzen 5 chips for similar money that absolutely demolish this thing. The value score of 54.5 out of 100 in our database feels about right.
詳細情報
Overview
The AMD A10-9700E is a budget APU from the Bristol Ridge era that still hangs around because it's cheap and runs cool. It's a 4-core, 4-thread chip on socket AM4 with a 35W TDP and Radeon R7 graphics baked in. Nothing about it screams modern, but for a basic desktop or a Linux box, it gets the job done without drama.
Our database puts its feature set at the 89th percentile, which sounds impressive until you realize that's mostly about having an iGPU and AM4 compatibility. Raw performance is a different story. Single-thread lands at the 35th percentile and multi-thread at 29th. This is not a chip for heavy lifting.
Common Questions
Q: Can I upgrade to a Ryzen CPU later with this motherboard?
Yes, the A10-9700E uses socket AM4, so you can drop in a Ryzen chip later as long as your motherboard's BIOS supports it. That's one of the main reasons people buy this as a placeholder.
Q: Does the stock cooler keep it cool enough?
Yes, the stock cooler is adequate for the 35W TDP and owners report no noticeable heat even under full load. It can get whiny though, so an aftermarket cooler is worth it if noise bothers you.
Q: What RAM speed should I use with this APU?
Stick to 2400 MHz DDR4. Some owners report that faster RAM gets downclocked and can cause crashes, so don't bother buying anything faster for this chip.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need any real CPU performance. The single-thread and multi-thread scores are near the bottom of our charts, so video editing, heavy multitasking, or modern gaming are out. Also skip it if you're building a new system from scratch, a used Ryzen 3 or Ryzen 5 APU on the same socket will run circles around it for similar money.
Verdict
Buy this if you need a cheap AM4 chip with integrated graphics for a basic desktop, HTPC, or Linux box, and you don't want to gamble on the used market. It runs cool, it's quiet enough with an aftermarket cooler, and it'll handle everyday tasks without complaint. Everyone else should look at used Ryzen APUs or save up for something newer.