Intel ULTRA 5 250K
The 3nm Arrow Lake Refresh architecture and 18-core hybrid design deliver a 37,558 PassMark multi-core score, making it a strong productivity engine with PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support. Its unlocked multiplier on the LGA 1851 socket provides straightforward overclocking headroom, while the 30MB L2 cache reduces latency in cache-sensitive workloads. This processor is best for AI developers and multitasking professionals who need high parallel throughput but do not rely on discrete-level integrated graphics.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Core Ultra 5 250K posts a 4,827 single-thread PassMark, which is 99th percentile and basically best-in-class. Multi-thread hits 52,313, good for 94th percentile, and the AI score of 96.2/100 makes it a standout for LLM workloads. At USD 210 to USD 220, it's one of the best value chips we've seen this generation.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Single-thread PassMark of 4,827 is 99th percentile, best-in-class responsiveness 99th
- Multi-thread PassMark of 52,313 is 94th percentile, strong for the price 97th
- 18 cores (6P+12E) handle multitasking and background tasks without breaking a sweat 97th
- AI and LLM score of 96.2/100 is a standout for a mid-range chip 94th
- Owners report manageable thermals and improved 1% lows in games
Cons
- No cooler included, so budget for a separate one
- User sentiment sits at 51st percentile, not everyone is thrilled
- Not the top raw FPS chip, some owners note a potential 5% FPS loss in certain games
- Social proof is only 61st percentile, limited review volume
- Server score of 81/100 is the weakest area
What owners think
The Word on the Street
How owner sentiment changed over time
ExclusiveBased on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.
Based on 11 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.
The proof
Performance
The 4,827 single-thread PassMark score is the headline. That's best-in-class territory, and it translates to a system that feels instant when you're opening apps, browsing, or doing anything that leans on one or two cores. The 52,313 multi-thread score is also strong, well above average, and it puts this chip ahead of most things in its price bracket for video encodes, code compiles, and heavy multitasking.
Intel pairs 6 P-cores with 12 E-cores here, and the 5.3GHz boost on the P-cores keeps latency-sensitive tasks moving. The 30MB of L3 cache helps with gaming frame pacing, and owners specifically call out improved 1% lows compared to older platforms. The 13 TOPS NPU is modest by current AI accelerator standards, but the chip still scores 96.2/100 for AI and LLM workloads in our database, which is a standout result for a mid-range part. Power sits at 125W base and 159W turbo, and users report manageable thermals even with mid-tier air coolers.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Core Ultra 5 |
| Model | 250K |
| Codename | Arrow Lake Refresh |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 3 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 18 |
| P-cores | 6 |
| E-cores | 12 |
| Threads | 18 |
| Base Clock | 4600 |
| Boost Clock | 5300 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 30 |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 52313 |
| PassMark Single | 4827 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 7200 |
| Channels | 2 |
| Max Memory | 256 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 1851 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 |
| TDP | 125 |
| Max Turbo Power | 159 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics |
| NPU TOPS | 13 |
vs Competition
Against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the story is nuanced. The 9800X3D will win raw gaming FPS in most titles thanks to its 3D V-Cache, and owners of the 250K acknowledge it doesn't top the FPS charts. But the 250K counters with a much lower price and stronger value for mixed workloads. The 18-core configuration gives it an edge in multitasking and productivity compared to the 8-core 9800X3D, and the 96.2/100 AI score makes it a smarter pick for local LLM tinkering. The other competitors in our list, like the older Core i9 X-Series and various Xeon parts, are either outdated platforms or server-focused chips that don't make sense for a desktop builder. The 250K is the sensible middle ground: modern platform, strong all-around performance, and a price that doesn't make you wince.
| Spec | Intel ULTRA 5 250K | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | SMC EPYC 9555P | Dell Inspiron 7700 | HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx | DAKboard CPU v4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 18 | 8 | 64 | 10 | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 18 | 16 | 128 | 12 | 2 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 5300 | 5200 | 4400 | 4700 | 2800 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 30 | 96 | 256 | 12 | 4 | - |
| Tdp W | 125 | 120 | 360 | 15 | 6 | - |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | AM5 | AMD Socket SP5 | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel BGA 1338 | BGA |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics | - | Iris Xe 96EU | Intel UHD Graphics | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AI | Feature | Platform | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Social Proof | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel ULTRA 5 250K | 93.5 | 96.9 | 96.5 | 51.2 | 93.4 | 94 | 61.1 | 99.1 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare | 91.2 | 98.4 | 95.1 | 92.6 | 87.5 | 90 | 96.5 | 95.6 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 76.8 | 96.7 | 0 | 90.6 | 99.5 | 1.5 | 88.7 |
| Dell Inspiron 7700 Compare | 62.3 | 69.4 | 70.8 | 0 | 99.4 | 66.4 | 27.4 | 82 |
| HP Celeron 14-dq3000dx Compare | 17.2 | 54.4 | 54.4 | 0 | 32 | 10.9 | 9.1 | 30.2 |
| DAKboard CPU v4 Compare | 12.6 | 20.1 | 17.5 | 0 | 11.9 | 17 | 59.7 | 20 |
Price
Value & Pricing
This is where the Core Ultra 5 250K gets interesting. US listings run USD 210 to USD 220, and Canadian pricing spans CAD 300 to CAD 338 across four vendors. That CAD 38 spread is worth paying attention to, and Memory Express has the best deal at the low end of that range. For a chip with 99th percentile single-thread performance and 94th percentile multi-thread, the price per frame and price per core is excellent. Owners repeatedly call out value for money as the top reason they bought this over pricier AMD options, and the budget score of 94.2/100 in our database backs that up.
Amazon 1 offer From ₹27,529
Price History
Read more
Overview
The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 52,313 and a single-thread score of 4,827. That single-thread number lands in the 99th percentile of our database, which means this chip is basically top of the charts for snappy everyday tasks and lightly-threaded workloads. The multi-thread score sits at the 94th percentile, so it's not the absolute king of heavy rendering, but it's knocking on the door while costing a lot less than the chips above it.
You get 18 cores split into 6 P-cores and 12 E-cores, a 5.3GHz boost clock, 30MB of L3 cache, and DDR5 support up to 256GB. There's no cooler in the box, which is standard for Intel K-series parts but still worth budgeting for. Owners seem genuinely happy with the value here, and the sentiment summary backs that up with an 82/100 score driven by praise for multitasking, thermals, and 1% lows in games.
Common Questions
Q: Does the Core Ultra 5 250K come with a cooler?
No, there's no cooler in the box. This is standard for Intel K-series parts, and you'll need to budget for a separate air cooler or AIO. Owners report that a mid-tier air cooler like a Pure Rock Pro 3 keeps temps manageable even under load.
Q: How does the 250K handle gaming compared to AMD's X3D chips?
It won't top raw FPS charts against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, and some owners note a potential 5% FPS loss in certain titles. But the 250K counters with much better value, stronger multitasking thanks to 18 cores, and improved 1% lows compared to older Intel platforms.
Q: What memory and platform does this chip support?
It runs on the LGA 1851 socket with Intel 800 series chipsets, and supports DDR5 memory up to 256GB across two channels. High-speed DDR5 up to 7200 MT/s is supported, and PCIe 5.0 is available for next-gen storage and GPUs.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're chasing absolute maximum gaming FPS and already own a Ryzen 7 9800X3D or similar X3D part. The 250K doesn't top raw frame rate charts, and the user sentiment percentile of 51st suggests not everyone is blown away. If you need serious server-grade reliability or ECC memory support in a production environment, the server score of 81/100 is the weakest area here, and you'd be better off with a Xeon or Threadripper. Also skip it if you're on a tight budget that can't absorb the cost of a separate cooler, since Intel doesn't include one.
Verdict
The Core Ultra 5 250K is the rare mid-range chip that punches above its weight in almost every category. Single-thread performance is best-in-class, multi-thread is well above average, and the value proposition is hard to argue with at USD 210 to USD 220. The lack of a cooler and the middling user sentiment percentile are the main dings, but the actual review text from owners is overwhelmingly positive. If you're building a new system on the LGA 1851 platform and want strong gaming, productivity, and AI performance without spending flagship money, this is the chip to beat.