TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

★★★★☆ 4.3 (188)

Mit nur 93 Gramm und einem flachen Pancake-Design ist es das ideale Immer-drauf-Objektiv für APS-C-Fujifilm-Kameras, das trotz des günstigen Preises einen STM-Autofokus mit Augenerkennung bietet. Der unabhängige, geklickte Blendenring und die USB-C-Schnittstelle für Firmware-Updates heben die Bedienbarkeit und Zukunftssicherheit in dieser Preisklasse deutlich hervor. Dieses Objektiv ist am besten für Streetfotografen und Reiseliebhaber geeignet, die eine unauffällige, leichte Festbrennweite mit zuverlässigem Autofokus suchen.

Focal length 27mm
Aperture 16
Mount FUJIFILM X
Weight 88 g
af type STM
lens type prime
TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm lens
54 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Snapshot

Vor- und Nachteile

Pros

Cons

What owners think

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer hat sich mit der Zeit verbessert
72/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysemittlere Konfidenz · 13 Quellen · Mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ3 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ2 '24: 4.4★ · 5 BewertungenQ3 '24: 4.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '24: 4.1★ · 9 BewertungenQ1 '25: 4.4★ · 5 BewertungenQ2 '25: 3.5★ · 4 BewertungenQ3 '25: 4.4★ · 9 BewertungenQ4 '25: 4.0★ · 11 BewertungenQ1 '26: 4.5★ · 8 Bewertungen1311124529549118Q3 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q1 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q1 202663/1004.2★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens as compact, good value, and decent for everyday use, but some noted edge softness, vignetting, and one found it disappointing.

    • Compact and lightweight design praised for everyday carry and travel.
    • Good value for money, budget-friendly alternative to Fuji lenses.
    • Edge softness and heavy vignetting noted, leading some to switch lenses.
    • One reviewer found the lens disappointing despite the low price.
  2. Q4 202564/1003.9★11 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens as compact, affordable, and great for travel/street photography, but some report vignetting, sharpness loss, and defects like non-working aperture or AF.

    • Compact, lightweight, and good value for budget-conscious photographers.
    • Vignetting and sharpness loss at lowest aperture noted, but correctable in software.
    • Defective units received: dirty, non-working aperture ring, and autofocus failure.
    • Pleasant bokeh, quick AF, and solid build quality when functioning properly.
  3. Q3 202555/1004.3★9 Bewertungen

    Reviewers noted good value and compact build, but heavy vignetting and manual aperture were common complaints. A few reported low contrast and sharpness concerns.

    • Heavy vignetting was a major issue for some, but others found it acceptable or fixable.
    • Great value and compact size for the price, especially compared to brand-name alternatives.
    • Manual aperture ring only, not adjustable from camera body, disliked by some users.
    • Sharpness and contrast fine at mid apertures, but soft wide open and in corners.
  4. Q2 202550/1003.5★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for value, sharpness, and compact size, but firmware updates require Windows 7/10, causing frustration for Mac and Windows 11 users.

    • Great value, sharp, compact, and good for street photography.
    • Firmware updates only work on Windows 7 or 10, not Mac or Windows 11.
    • Lens is well-built but firmware limitations cause autofocus issues.
    • No support for Mac or modern Windows, making lens unusable for some.
  5. Q1 202572/1004.4★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for its compact size, fast autofocus, and value, but noted heavy vignetting at f/2.8 and occasional autofocus issues.

    • Compact form factor and portability praised for everyday and travel use.
    • Vignetting at f/2.8 is heavy; some find it problematic, others like the effect.
    • Autofocus is fast and quiet for the price, though occasionally unreliable.
    • Uncommon 39mm filter threads and electronic manual focus feel criticized.
  6. Q4 202472/1004.1★9 Bewertungen

    Reviewers praise the lens for its compact size, sharp image quality, and value. However, reports of severe flare/light defects and video flickering raise reliability concerns.

    • Compact, lightweight pancake design ideal for street and everyday photography.
    • Sharp images and solid autofocus performance for the price.
    • Two copies with severe haze/flare issues; lens rendered unusable.
    • Flickering when recording slow-motion video on Sony ZV-E10.
  7. Q2 202472/1004.4★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for its compact size, image quality, and value, but note corner softness and a poorly designed lens cap that falls off easily.

    • Compact, lightweight, and pocketable design ideal for travel and everyday use.
    • Good image quality with pleasing color and depth, especially for the price.
    • Lens cap falls off easily, especially with filters or hood; a persistent design flaw.
    • Corner vignetting and softness noted, but not always noticeable in practice.
  8. Q1 202495/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for its sharpness, compact size, and value. Autofocus is noted as slow in video but acceptable for stills.

    • Sharp across frame from f4, center sharp at f2.8.
    • Compact size fits small bags, ideal for travel.
    • Autofocus slow in video, but usable in AF-C mode.
    • Excellent value for price, good bokeh and build.
  9. Q4 202240/1004.0★3 Bewertungen

    Buyers appreciated compact size, build quality, and vintage look, but criticized severe vignetting and smeared corners on full-frame, particularly at wide apertures.

    • Compact, lightweight design with good build and vintage image character.
    • Heavy vignetting and blue tint at wide apertures on full-frame, hard to correct.
    • Corners are smeared and soft, especially on full-frame and at wider apertures.
    • Manual focus and aperture rings are nice, but lens removal can be difficult.

Basierend auf 66 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

The proof

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

AF 86
Bokeh 42.6
Build 96.4
Macro 62
Optical 2
Aperture 52.3
User Sentiment 16.4
Versatility 34
Social Proof 71.4
Stabilization 35.8

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Optics

Type prime
Focal Length Min 27
Focal Length Max 27
Elements 6
Groups 5

Aperture

Max Aperture 16
Min Aperture 2.8
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 8

Build

Mount FUJIFILM X
Format APS-C
Weather Sealed No
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.2 lbs
Filter Thread 39

AF & Stabilization

AF Type STM
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 350

Im Vergleich

Spec TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm Canon RF RF28-70mm F2.8 IS STM Macro Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Tamron Di III-A 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200
Focal Length 27mm 28-70mm 16-300mm 18-300mm 16-85mm 28-200mm
Max Aperture 16 2.8 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/3.5 f/4
Mount FUJIFILM X Canon RF Sony E Fuji X Nikon F L-Mount
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true true false false true
Weight (g) 88 495 615 92 59 413
AF Type STM STM HLA VXD linear motor AF-S Autofocus
Lens Type prime zoom zoom zoom zoom macro
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm 8642.696.462252.316.43471.435.8
Canon RF RF28-70mm F2.8 IS STM Macro Compare 8688.26777.784.58698.677.452.998.2
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Compare 55.186.657.686.798.979.9099.678.199
Tamron Di III-A 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD Compare 98.27896.288.673.579.930.399.283.280.7
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Compare 55.17898.559.964.279.981.494.288.192.3
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 Compare 55.180.873.571.790.974.5095.662.799.4

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Macro (44.5)Overall (54.3)Budget (59)Street (58.8)Travel (56.5)Portrait (49.4)Landscape (35.9)Professional (41)Video Cinema (43.2)Wildlife Sports (50.2)

Ähnliche Produkte