iMangoo Pink

★★★★☆ 4.3 (8,922)

A built-in DAC chip delivers high-resolution audio and deep bass without distortion, while the magnetic earbud design prevents tangling and allows them to hang securely around your neck. Its broad USB-C compatibility spans the latest iPhones, Samsung Galaxy, and Pixel devices, reinforced by a durable 1.2-meter cable and metal-plated connectors. These wired earbuds are best for budget-conscious users who need a reliable, zero-latency audio connection for daily calls and media across multiple devices.

form factor in-ear
driver type dynamic
iMangoo Pink earbuds
48 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 ₹
Keine Angebote verfügbar

Überblick

Vor- und Nachteile

Vorteile

  • Strong social proof (80th percentile) 80th
  • Strong sound (80th percentile) 80th
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile) 72nd
  • Strong mic (70th percentile) 70th

Nachteile

  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Was Besitzer sagen

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer hat sich mit der Zeit verbessert
78/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysehohe Konfidenz · 83 Quellen · Mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '22: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '22: 1.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '23: 3.5★ · 2 BewertungenQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 3 BewertungenQ4 '24: 4.0★ · 5 BewertungenQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ3 '25: 4.0★ · 8 BewertungenQ4 '25: 3.9★ · 13 BewertungenQ1 '26: 4.7★ · 33 BewertungenQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 4 Bewertungen1121333524813334Q3 '22Q1 '23Q1 '24Q3 '24Q1 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q1 202682/1004.7★33 Bewertungen

    Most buyers find these wired USB-C headphones offer good sound and comfortable fit for the price. Some report connection loss with cable movement and sizing issues for small ears.

    • Good sound quality and clarity for audiobooks, music, and calls.
    • Comfortable fit with multiple ear tip sizes; stays in ears for many users.
    • Cable movement causes intermittent signal loss or stopping of audio.
    • Fit issues for small ears; "one size fits all" design uncomfortable for some.
  2. Q4 202565/1003.9★13 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised comfort, sound clarity, and value but reported durability issues, connection problems, and misleading noise-cancellation claims.

    • Comfortable to wear long hours with good sound quality and clear audio.
    • Several units failed after 8–11 months due to volume jumping or stopping working.
    • Mic quality is poor for calls; callers report garbled or low sound.
    • Not active noise cancelling despite description; customers felt misled.
  3. Q3 202578/1004.0★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the sound quality, comfort, and value for the price. Some report occasional Bluetooth disconnection and poor microphone quality for calls.

    • Sound quality is clear, crisp, and bassy, especially given the low price.
    • Microphone quality is poor; callers can't hear clearly. But music performance is excellent.
    • Random sound disconnects through phone speaker reported on multiple devices.
    • One unit had a headphone jack that did not fit into the phone.
  4. Q4 202476/1004.0★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised comfort, durability, and magnetic anti-tangle design; one reported severely poor voice quality. Overall satisfied for the price.

    • Comfortable fit and durable, thick wire praised.
    • Magnetic earpieces reduce tangling, convenient.
    • Good value for price; decent for podcasts/recordings.
    • One user reported terrible voice quality, unusable.

Basierend auf 83 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

Anc 31.6
Mic 69.7
Build 34.6
Sound 79.9
Battery 47.1
Comfort 71.6
User Sentiment 49.8
Connectivity 30.4
Nutzerresonanz 80.3

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Design

Form Factor in-ear
Wearing Style ear-hook
Ear Tips S, L
Weight 0.1 kg / 0.1 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Impedance 32
Hi-Res Audio Yes
Codecs USB C Headphones for iPhone 17 Pro Max Air 16 15 Plus, Type C Earphone with Mic HiFi Stereo Magnet in Ear USBC Wired Earbuds for Samsung Galaxy S26 S25 S24 Ultra S23 Fe S22+ Flip/Pixel 10 9 8, Orange

Connectivity

Wireless No

Earbud Battery

Charging USB-C

Case Battery

Case Charging USB-C

Microphone

Microphone Yes
Mic Count 1
NC Mic Yes

Features

Touch Controls Yes

Im Vergleich

Spec iMangoo Pink Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-N Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Sony WF-1000XM6 Google Pixel Buds Pro EarFun Air Pro 4+
Form Factor in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear in-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic hybrid
Wireless false true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation - true true true true true
Bluetooth Version - 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.0 6.0
Battery Life Hours - 8 6 8 11 12
Case Battery Hours - 28 18 24 31 54
Water Resistance - IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IPX4 IP55
Multipoint - true true true true true
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortUser SentimentConnectivityNutzerresonanz
iMangoo Pink 31.669.734.679.947.171.649.830.480.3
Technics EAH-AZ100 EAH-AZ100-N Compare 97.397.280.79981.571.697.199.872
Bose QuietComfort Ultra 896637-0010 Compare 97.391.280.796.747.194.29297.989.6
Sony WF-1000XM6 Compare 97.399.880.788.678.471.649.897.980.3
Google Pixel Buds Pro Compare 97.382.680.793.384.771.697.195.389.6
EarFun Air Pro 4+ Compare 97.397.291.899.796.171.697.199.389.6

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Calls (34.6)Music (39.5)Gesamt (47.5)Budget (59.3)Gaming (42)Travel (29.6)Commute (28.3)Fitness (32.6)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte