Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong sensor (97th percentile) 97th
- Strong display (87th percentile) 87th
- Strong evf (87th percentile) 87th
- Strong af (83rd percentile) 83rd
Nachteile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average burst (33rd percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Type | BSI CMOS |
| Size | medium-format |
| Megapixels | 100 MP |
| ISO Range | 64 |
| Processor | Hasselblad Natural Color Solution (HNCS) |
Autofocus
| AF Points | 294 |
| AF Type | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 294 |
| Eye AF | No |
| Animal AF | No |
| Subject Detection | No |
Shooting
| Max Shutter | 1/6000 |
| Electronic Shutter | Yes |
Video
| Max Resolution | 1080p |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 3.2" |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | Yes |
| EVF Resolution | 2.36 M dots |
Build
| Weather Sealed | No |
| Weight | 0.6 kg / 1.4 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No |
| USB | USB-C |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C | Fujifilm X-H2S | Sony a7R V | Nikon Z Z9 | Canon EOS R6 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix S S5 II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 100MP medium-format | 26.2MP aps-c | 61MP full-frame | 45.7MP full-frame | 32.5MP full-frame | 24.2MP full-frame |
| AF Points | 294 | 425 | 693 | 493 | 1053 | 779 |
| Burst FPS | - | 40 | 10 | 30 | 40 | 30 |
| Video | 1080p | 6K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 8K @120fps | 8K @120fps | 6K @60fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 620 | 579 | 723 | 1160 | 609 | 658 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C | 83.2 | 86.5 | 70.6 | 33.2 | 23.1 | 97.4 | 46.5 | 86.9 | 74.5 | 65 | 35.6 |
| Fujifilm X-H2S Compare | 89.7 | 96.7 | 94.8 | 93.5 | 98 | 96.9 | 98.3 | 99.1 | 95.6 | 94.1 | 95.4 |
| Sony a7R V Compare | 94.6 | 98.9 | 97.1 | 78.3 | 96.1 | 76.5 | 94.1 | 86.9 | 95.6 | 97.9 | 98.6 |
| Nikon Z Z9 Compare | 91.4 | 91.2 | 99.4 | 96.1 | 99 | 69.8 | 97.8 | 86.9 | 95.6 | 94.1 | 88.5 |
| Canon EOS R6 Mark III Compare | 98.9 | 90.4 | 95.2 | 93.5 | 98.7 | 63.8 | 97.2 | 99.1 | 95.6 | 94.1 | 99.6 |
| Panasonic Lumix S S5 II Compare | 97.8 | 90.6 | 96.2 | 91.4 | 94.5 | 54.5 | 92.2 | 99.4 | 95.6 | 94.1 | 88.5 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wir verfolgen die Preise für dieses Produkt seit dem 18. Juli 2026. Das Diagramm erscheint, sobald mehr Daten vorliegen.
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.