CyberGeek GeForce RTX 5090 Triple Fan 32GB GDDR7
The 32GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivers 1792 GB/s bandwidth, making it a standout for running large local LLMs and handling 8K assets without bottlenecking. Its triple-fan cooler and included GPU holder address the practical concerns of thermals and sag in a high-power card, while the triple DisplayPort 2.1b outputs drive up to 4K 480Hz displays. This card is best for AI researchers and developers running on-device inference with large models who need massive VRAM headroom and high memory throughput.
Güncel satıcı fiyatı yok
Özet
The 30-Second Version
The CyberGeek RTX 5090 is a VRAM monster with best-in-class raster and AI performance. It's also expensive, power-hungry, and not very efficient. Worth it for creators and LLM tinkerers, overkill for most gamers.
Pros & Cons
Artılar
- 32GB GDDR7 with 1792 GB/s bandwidth is a creator's dream. 99th
- Raster performance sits in the 99th percentile, basically best-in-class. 98th
- AI TOPS and Tensor cores make local LLM work genuinely fast. 96th
- DP 2.1b UHBR20 and HDMI 2.1b give you serious display flexibility. 85th
Eksiler
- 575W TDP means your power bill will notice.
- Efficiency is a weak spot at 25th percentile.
- The price is brutal, affordability sits at 1st percentile.
- Thermals are just okay for a triple fan card.
Kanıtlar
Performance
Raster performance is top of the charts, sitting in the 99th percentile in our database. The 2407MHz boost clock and 3352 CUDA cores push frames hard at 4K, and the 32GB of VRAM puts it in the 98th percentile for memory capacity. AI workloads land at 96th percentile, which makes sense given the Tensor core count and that massive bandwidth. Ray tracing is strong at 85th percentile, though not the absolute best we've seen. The weak spots are compute at 40th percentile and efficiency down at 25th percentile. A 575W TDP means this thing drinks power, and the triple fan cooler only lands at 73rd percentile for thermals. It'll stay cool enough, but it's working for it.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 5090 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Blackwell |
| Class | consumer |
Memory
| VRAM | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bus | 512 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 3352 |
| Tensor Cores | 5 |
| RT Cores | 4 |
| Base Clock | 2017 |
| Boost Clock | 2407 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 38958 |
| GPU Compute | 24458 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 575 |
| Cooler | Triple Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 8K |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| Upscaling | DLSS 4 |
vs Competition
Against the ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090, the CyberGeek holds its own on raw specs but likely trails on cooler quality and brand trust. The Gigabyte AORUS RTX 5080 and MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti are cheaper and more efficient, but they give up a ton of VRAM and AI performance. The Sapphire NITRO+ and ZOTAC AMP Extreme Infinity are also in the mix, but none of them touch the 32GB GDDR7 and 512-bit bus here. If you need the memory and AI throughput, the CyberGeek is hard to beat on paper. If you just want to game at 1440p or 4K without melting your outlet, the 5080 class cards make way more sense.
| Spec | CyberGeek GeForce RTX 5090 Triple Fan | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 32GB GDDR7 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2407 | 2407 | 2588 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 575 | 575 | 300 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 512 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Ürün | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Kullanıcı yorumları | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyberGeek GeForce RTX 5090 Triple Fan | 96 | 85.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 39.6 | 53.1 | 72.7 | 25 | 81.8 | 8 | 0.7 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.5 | 96.2 | 72.7 | 25 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD Compare | 79.2 | 88.3 | 85.5 | 88.8 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.1 | 94 | 95.5 | 21.6 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.5 | 88.8 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.1 | 94 | 88.8 | 21.1 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.1 | 97.5 | 88.6 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.2 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.8 | 96.1 | 91.6 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.9 | 98.7 | 78.3 | 18.6 |
Fiyat
Value & Pricing
At $8,449 USD, this is not a value play. Affordability lands at the 1st percentile in our database, which is about as bad as it gets. You're paying a huge premium for the 32GB of VRAM and the AI chops. If you're running local LLMs or heavy creator workloads, the memory headroom might justify it. For pure gaming, you can get most of the raster performance for a lot less money elsewhere. The budget score of 49.9 out of 100 tells the story: this card is a tool, not a deal.
Devamını oku
Overview
The CyberGeek RTX 5090 Triple Fan is a monster card aimed at people who need serious VRAM and AI grunt. 32GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus gives it 1792 GB/s of bandwidth, and the 3352 AI TOPS from those 5th Gen Tensor Cores means local LLM work and AI content creation are the real story here. Gaming is obviously strong too, but this card feels built for creators and tinkerers first.
It's a triple fan design with a metal backplate and a bundled GPU holder, so CyberGeek is at least thinking about sag and thermals. The spec sheet is loaded: DP 2.1b UHBR20, HDMI 2.1b, PCIe 5.0 x16. But the price tag is eye-watering, and the efficiency story is rough. More on that below.
Common Questions
Q: Can this card run local LLMs like a 70B model?
Yes, the 32GB of GDDR7 gives you enough headroom for larger models and longer context windows. The 1792 GB/s bandwidth also helps with token generation speed.
Q: Will my power supply handle this card?
You'll want at least a 1000W quality PSU to be safe. The card has a 575W TDP, and transient spikes can go higher under load.
Q: Is the triple fan cooler enough for sustained workloads?
It's decent but not exceptional. Thermal performance sits at 73rd percentile, so it'll stay stable, but expect fan noise under heavy sustained loads.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're a pure gamer on a normal budget. The 575W TDP and $8,449 price tag make no sense for 1440p or even most 4K gaming. You'd be better off with an RTX 5080 class card and a much happier wallet. Also skip it if your case or PSU can't handle the power draw and heat.
Verdict
Buy this if you're running local LLMs, doing AI content creation, or working with 8K assets and need every gig of VRAM you can get. The 32GB GDDR7 and 1792 GB/s bandwidth are the whole point. Gamers who just want high frame rates at 4K should look at cheaper options. This is a workstation card wearing a gaming GPU costume.