Gigabyte 1TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
현재 판매처 최신 가격 없음
요약
The 30-Second Version
Fast in sprints, wheezes in marathons. Buy it for budget gaming, skip it for serious work.
Pros & Cons
장점
- Blazing 7100 MB/s sequential reads 92nd
- Strong random performance for a DRAM-less drive 82nd
- Decent 700 TBW endurance 75th
- PCIe 4.0 speeds at a budget-friendly price point
단점
- No DRAM cache, sustained performance suffers
- Terrible portable score, not for external enclosures
- Only 1TB capacity, no bigger options
- Customer rating is basically nonexistent
근거 자료
Performance
The sequential numbers are legit. 7100 MB/s read and 6100 MB/s write put this drive in the top tier of PCIe 4.0 drives, and the random IOPS are even better at 940K read and 900K write. That's a standout showing for a DRAM-less drive. But here's the catch: without DRAM, sustained writes and heavy multitasking take a hit. The 700 TBW endurance rating is solid, but the portable score of 14.9 out of 100 is a real letdown. This thing is meant to sit in a desktop and stay there.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 1000 |
| Form Factor | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 7100 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 6100 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 940000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 900000 |
Hardware
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 700 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1500000 |
vs Competition
The Samsung 9100 PRO and Crucial T500 both have DRAM caches and better sustained performance, though they cost more. The Kingston Fury Renegade offers similar speeds with better endurance ratings. If you're just gaming and loading games, the 7000E holds its own. But for video editing or heavy workstation use, the WD_BLACK SN7100 or Lexar NM1090 PRO are safer bets. The 7000E wins on price, but you're giving up consistency to get there.
| Spec | Gigabyte 1TB SSD | Samsung 9100 PRO | Crucial T500 | Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G | Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 | Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1TB | 2TB | 2TB | 2TB | 1TB | 2TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 7,100 MB/s | 14,700 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,900 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s |
| Nand Type | - | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Endurance | 700 TBW | 1200 TBW | 1200 TBW | 2000 TBW | 600 TBW | 1400 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| 제품 | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | 사용자 평판 | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabyte 1TB SSD | 82.2 | 92.3 | 14.6 | 54.9 | 75 | 1.4 | 52.8 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 98.7 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 78.3 | 85.9 | 95 | 18.3 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 93.8 | 96.5 | 98.8 | 78.3 | 82.9 | 95 | 19.9 |
| Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare | 92.9 | 94 | 93.6 | 78.3 | 93.9 | 95 | 16.4 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 Compare | 97.5 | 98.4 | 97.3 | 54.9 | 80.9 | 95 | 38.3 |
| Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare | 97.9 | 98.2 | 97.3 | 78.3 | 90.9 | 52.5 | 24.5 |
가격
Value & Pricing
At around $190 USD, this drive is priced like a mid-range PCIe 4.0 drive but performs like a high-end one in short bursts. The problem is you can get drives with DRAM caches and better sustained performance for similar money. It's not a bad deal, but it's not the steal Gigabyte wants you to think it is.
2026년 11월 9일부터 이 제품의 가격을 추적하고 있습니다. 데이터가 쌓이면 차트가 표시됩니다.
더 보기
Overview
The Gigabyte AORUS Gen4 7000E is a weird one. On paper it looks like a budget speed demon with 7100 MB/s reads and 6100 MB/s writes, but the DRAM-less design and that 2.5-star customer rating tell a different story. The one thing to know? This drive is fast in short bursts but falls apart when you actually push it hard.
Common Questions
Q: Will this fit in my laptop?
It's a standard M.2 2280 form factor, so it'll physically fit most laptops. But the portable score is terrible, and without DRAM it'll run hot and throttle in tight spaces. Stick to desktops with good airflow.
Q: Is the DRAM-less design a dealbreaker?
For gaming and everyday use, not really. Modern NVMe drives use HMB to borrow system RAM, so you won't notice much difference in load times. But if you're moving huge files or editing 4K video, you'll feel the slowdown.
Q: How does this compare to the Samsung 980 Pro?
The 7000E actually beats the 980 Pro on paper with faster sequential reads. But the 980 Pro has DRAM and better sustained performance. For pure gaming, the 7000E is fine. For anything else, the 980 Pro is still the safer pick.
Who Should Skip This
If you're editing video, running a workstation, or need a drive for an external enclosure, this isn't it. The DRAM-less design and terrible portable score will frustrate you. Go grab a WD_BLACK SN7100 or Samsung 9100 PRO instead. You'll pay more, but you won't be fighting thermal throttling and write slowdowns.
Verdict
The AORUS Gen4 7000E is a solid budget gaming drive if you can find it on sale. The sequential speeds are genuinely impressive, and for loading games or booting Windows, it'll feel snappy. But the DRAM-less design and that abysmal portable score mean this isn't the drive for content creators or anyone who needs sustained write performance. If you're building a budget gaming rig and want fast load times without breaking the bank, this works. Just don't expect it to keep up with the big boys when the workload gets heavy.
