Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6

★★★★★ 4.5 (1,902)

{ "review": "Sa conception optique à 14 éléments dont 3 en verre ED et son stabilisateur OS en font un télézoom léger de 608g offrant une plage 70-300mm stabilisée. La mise au point minimale de 1,5 m et le rapport de reproduction 1:3,9 autorisent des gros plans polyvalents, complétés par un diaphragme à 9 lames pour un bokeh doux. Idéal pour les photographes amateurs en monture Nikon FX cherchant un objectif de voyage abordable pour le portrait, le sport occasionnel ou la photo animalière." }

Focal length 70-300mm
Aperture f/4
Mount Canon EF
stabilization Oui
Weight 608 g
af type Auto and Manual Focus
lens type telephoto
Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 lens
62 Score global
Prix 0 £GB
Aucune offre disponible

Aperçu

The 30-Second Version

A budget telephoto zoom with a 4.5-star rating from over 1,900 owners and a versatility score in the 91st percentile. The 1:2 macro mode and effective stabilization are standout features at this price. Just be ready for slow autofocus in low light and some softness at 300mm without a tripod.

Pros & Cons

Points forts

  • Excellent sharpness for the price, with an optical score in the 78th percentile 91st
  • Versatile 70-300mm range with a handy 1:2 macro mode at the long end 83rd
  • Effective optical stabilization, ranking in the 83rd percentile 82nd
  • Lightweight 608g build makes it easy to carry all day 78th
  • Fantastic value backed by a 4.5-star rating from over 1,900 owners

Points faibles

  • Slow, noisy autofocus that struggles in low light, sitting in the 54th percentile
  • Softness at 300mm without a tripod is a common complaint
  • Rotating front element makes using polarizers a hassle
  • Bokeh quality is a weak point, landing in the bottom quarter of our database
  • Not weather-sealed, so you'll want to be careful in rain or dust

L'avis des propriétaires

The Word on the Street

4.5/5 (1902 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently call this the best value telephoto lens they've ever bought, praising the sharp images and useful macro mode.
👎 A recurring gripe is the autofocus, which is described as slow and noisy, especially when the light drops.
🤔 The build quality feels solid to most, but the stiff zoom ring on new copies and the rotating front element annoy some users.

L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps

Exclusivité

D'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.

L'avis des propriétaires s'est refroidi depuis la sortie
84/100Notre analyse IA du ressenticonfiance moyenne · 16 sources · mai 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '08: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '08: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '09: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '09: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ1 '10: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '10: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '11: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '12: 4.5★ · 2 avisQ1 '13: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ2 '13: 3.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '14: 4.3★ · 3 avisQ2 '14: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '14: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '14: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '15: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '15: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '16: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '19: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '19: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ3 '20: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 1 avis111211122131111111111Q2 '08Q1 '09Q1 '10Q1 '11Q1 '13Q1 '14Q3 '14Q1 '15Q4 '16Q2 '19Q4 '25
Note moyenneSatisfaits (4-5★)Insatisfaits (1-2★)Hauteur des barres = nombre d'avis

D'après 26 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.

Les preuves

Performance

Sharpness is this lens's party trick. Owners consistently rave about the image quality, and our optical score puts it in the 78th percentile, which is impressive for a lens in this class. The three SLD glass elements and Super Multi-Layer Coating do their job, keeping fringing and ghosting under control in most situations. You'll get the best results between f/8 and f/11, where the 9-blade diaphragm helps produce a surprisingly decent bokeh, even if our bokeh score lands in a disappointing 23rd percentile. The macro mode is genuinely useful, letting you focus down to 950mm for a 1:2 magnification, which is a nice bonus for flower shots or detail work.

The weak spot is autofocus. It's a middle-of-the-pack performer in our AF rankings, and that tracks with user feedback. The built-in motor is quiet enough in good light, but it hunts noticeably when things get dim, and it's not the fastest for tracking moving subjects. You'll also notice some softness creeping in at 300mm if you're not on a tripod, even with the stabilization helping out. It's a lens that rewards good technique.

Performance Percentiles

AF 12.8
Bokeh 76.3
Build 47.1
Macro 45.9
Optical 77.8
Aperture 64.5
User Sentiment 51.9
Versatility 90.6
Preuve sociale 82.1
Stabilization 82.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Telephoto
Focal Length Min 70
Focal Length Max 300
Elements 14
Groups 10
ED Elements 3
Coating Super Multi-Layer Coated

Aperture

Max Aperture f/4
Min Aperture 4-5.6
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Canon EF
Format full-frame
Weight 0.6 kg / 1.3 lbs
Filter Thread 58

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Auto and Manual Focus
Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 950
Max Magnification 1:2

vs Competition

Stacked against modern competitors, the Sigma shows its age in some areas but holds its own where it counts. The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is a much faster, more modern lens with a constant aperture, but it can't touch the Sigma's 300mm reach or macro capability. The Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 and Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 are in a completely different league for sharpness and low-light performance, but they're also several times the price and lack the telephoto range. The Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is a closer match in spirit, a compact, stabilized zoom, but it's a standard kit lens with nowhere near the reach. The Sigma's real competition is other budget 70-300mm lenses, and it consistently comes out on top for image quality and that macro trick.

Spec Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2
Focal Length 70-300mm 17-70mm 17-28mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 27mm
Max Aperture f/4 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/1.2
Mount Canon EF Sony E Nikon Z Micro Four Thirds Sony E Sony E
Stabilization true true false true true false
Weather Sealed false true true true false true
Weight (g) 608 544 450 306 326 560
AF Type Auto and Manual Focus RXD Stepping Motor Autofocus Linear motor STM
Lens Type telephoto zoom zoom zoom zoom prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilityPreuve socialeStabilization
Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 12.876.347.145.977.864.551.990.682.182.6
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Compare 53.685.869.485.191.382.663.989.686.282.6
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare 87.285.87685.188.482.691.168.371.536.8
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.680.58650.886.782.663.980.686.297
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 98.173.873.240.378.975.844.795.990.382.6
Viltrox Pro AF 27mm f/1.2 Compare 87.298.768.238.582.698.591.133.890.336.8

Prix

Value & Pricing

This is where the Sigma 70-300mm really shines. It's widely considered a performance-to-price winner, and our data backs that up. You're getting a stabilized telephoto zoom with a legitimate macro function for a fraction of what a first-party lens would cost. The 4.5-star rating across nearly 2,000 reviews isn't just noise, it's a clear signal that this lens delivers way more than its price tag suggests. If you're an amateur photographer looking to explore telephoto and macro without emptying your wallet, this is one of the easiest recommendations we can make.

En savoir plus

Overview

The Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro is a budget telephoto zoom that's been around the block, and its 4.5-star average from over 1,900 reviews tells you it's doing something right. In our database, it lands in the 91st percentile for versatility, which makes sense given the 70-300mm range and a 1:2 macro mode that kicks in at the long end. It's not going to win any speed awards with that f/4-5.6 aperture, but for the price, you're getting a lot of focal length in a relatively light 608g package. The optical stabilization is a real plus here, ranking well above average and helping to tame camera shake at 300mm.

Common Questions

Q: How good is the macro mode on this lens?

It's a real highlight. The macro mode engages between 200mm and 300mm, letting you focus as close as 950mm for a 1:2 magnification. That's not true 1:1 macro, but it's more than enough for detailed flower shots, product photos, and getting close to insects without a dedicated macro lens.

Q: Does the image stabilization make a big difference?

Absolutely. Our stabilization score puts it in the 83rd percentile, which is well above average. It gives you about 2-3 stops of compensation, making it much easier to get sharp shots at 300mm handheld. Without it, you'd need to keep your shutter speed very high or use a tripod to avoid soft images.

Q: Is this lens good for sports or wildlife?

It can work in a pinch, but it's not ideal. The autofocus speed is only average, ranking in the 54th percentile, so it will struggle to track fast-moving subjects. For stationary wildlife or sports in bright daylight, the 300mm reach is useful. But if you're serious about action, you'll want a lens with a faster, more reliable AF motor.

Who Should Skip This

If you shoot a lot in low light or need fast, silent autofocus for video or action, this lens will frustrate you. The f/5.6 aperture at the long end and the noisy, hunting AF motor are real limitations. Portrait photographers should also look elsewhere, our portrait score is a weak 36.2, and the bokeh quality just isn't there. And if you're a pro who needs tack-sharp corners wide open at 300mm, this budget-friendly zoom isn't built for that level of scrutiny.

Verdict

The Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro is a classic for a reason. It's not the fastest, it's not the quietest, and it won't impress pixel-peepers at 300mm wide open. But for the vast majority of hobbyist photographers, it's a sharp, versatile, and incredibly affordable way to get into telephoto and macro shooting. The stabilization is a lifesaver, and the image quality is genuinely impressive for the price. If you can live with the leisurely autofocus and know to stop down a bit at the long end, this lens will make you very happy.

Usage Scores

Macro (66.8)Global (61.6)Budget (60.4)Street (52.3)Travel (51)Portrait (61.3)Landscape (56.6)Professional (50.3)Video Cinema (53.3)Wildlife Sports (49)

Produits similaires