Nikon 1673

★★★★★ 4.6 (150)

Son design de boîtier rétro cache un capteur CMOS DX de 20,9 MP avec stabilisation IBIS, une rafale à 11 i/s et une vidéo 4K à 120 i/s. Avec son écran tactile articulé, son poids plume de 390 g et l’envoi automatique des clichés vers un smartphone, il est parfaitement adapt

Type mirrorless
Sensor 20.9MP aps-c
AF Points 209 pts
Burst 11 fps
Video 4K @30fps
IBIS Oui
Weight 699 g
Nikon 1673 camera
77 Score global
Aussi disponible dans:

Aperçu

Avantages et inconvénients

Points forts

  • Strong evf (95th percentile) 95th
  • Strong connectivity (94th percentile) 94th
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile) 89th
  • Strong sensor (86th percentile) 86th

Points faibles

L'avis des propriétaires

L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps

Exclusivité

D'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.

L'avis des propriétaires est resté stable dans le temps
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '21: 4.9★ · 16 avisQ4 '21: 4.1★ · 8 avisQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 6 avisQ2 '22: 4.7★ · 7 avisQ3 '22: 4.0★ · 3 avisQ4 '22: 4.0★ · 2 avisQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 2 avisQ3 '23: 4.0★ · 1 avisQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 avisQ2 '26: 4.8★ · 6 avis1686732211116Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q1 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
Note moyenneSatisfaits (4-5★)Insatisfaits (1-2★)Hauteur des barres = nombre d'avisDate estimée
  1. Q2 202695/1004.8★6 avis

    Buyers in Q2 2026 love the Z fc for its retro design, fun shooting experience, and high-quality images. Many recommend adding a grip for better handling.

    • Retro design and manual dials praised for fun, enthusiast appeal.
    • Image quality: sharp photos, vibrant colors, great JPEGs and video.
    • Grip needed for comfortable handling; several users recommend third-party grip.
    • Compact, lightweight body ideal for travel and everyday use.
  2. Q3 202267/1004.0★3 avis

    Buyers praised the camera's design and ease of use, but noted ergonomic issues and limited manual controls.

    • Attractive design that invites frequent use and great photos.
    • Ergonomic issues: hard to hold, causes hand cramp, needs add-on grip.
    • Limited manual controls; many adjustments only via touch-screen menu.
    • Poor image quality with significant resolution drop and cropping issues.
  3. Q2 202286/1004.7★7 avis

    Buyers praised the Zfc's retro design, fun factor, and image quality, but noted battery life and kit lens vignetting as drawbacks.

    • Retro design and fun shooting experience highly praised.
    • Kit lens vignetting at full extension; some prefer third-party lenses.
    • Battery life short compared to DSLRs; extra battery recommended.
    • Controls fun but not practical for fast shooting; ISO button missing.
  4. Q1 202295/1005.0★6 avis

    Buyers love the retro design and ease of use, praising image quality and video. Some note the need for an additional grip and minor lens flaws.

    • Retro design with physical dials praised for ease and fun factor.
    • Excellent image quality, sharp photos, and film-like 4K video.
    • 28mm lens good but bokeh imperfect and lens flare sloppy.
    • Camera body awkward to hold; third-party grip recommended.
  5. Q4 202171/1004.1★8 avis

    Buyers praised the retro design, autofocus, and compact size, but noted flash incompatibility, limited lens choices, and lack of a grip.

    • Retro design and nostalgic feel are highly appreciated.
    • Excellent autofocus and image stabilization for handheld shots.
    • Incompatible with most speed lights; HSS and iTTL issues reported.
    • Limited lens selection and no grip; aftermarket parts needed.
  6. Q3 202196/1004.9★16 avis

    Buyers in Q3 2021 loved the retro design and nostalgic feel, praising it as a fun, everyday camera. Some noted the cheap plastic battery door and lack of IBIS.

    • Retro styling and nostalgic feel reminiscent of film cameras like FE/FM2.
    • Compact, lightweight, and fun for daily carry and travel photography.
    • Build quality: loved overall but battery door feels cheaply made in plastic.
    • No IBIS and kit lens quality is mediocre; some miss full-frame sensor.

D'après 54 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.

Les preuves

Performances

Percentiles de performance

AF 82.8
EVF 94.9
Build 76.9
Burst 73.8
Video 68.7
Sensor 85.7
Battery 46
Display 85.4
Connectivity 94.3
Preuve sociale 88.7
Stabilization 75.2

Caractéristiques techniques

Fiche technique complète

Sensor

Type CMOS
Size aps-c
Megapixels 20.9 MP
ISO Range 100
Processor EXPEED 6

Autofocus

AF Points 209
AF Type Hybrid phase-detection/contrast AF with AF assist
Eye AF Yes
Animal AF Yes
Subject Detection Yes

Shooting

Burst (Mechanical) 11
Max Shutter 1/4000
Electronic Shutter Yes

Video

Max Resolution 4K
4K FPS 30
10-bit No
Log Profile Yes
Codec H.264

Display & EVF

Screen Size 3"
Touchscreen Yes
Articulating Yes
EVF Resolution 3.69 M dots

Build

Weight 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs
Battery Life 300

Connectivity

Wi-Fi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB USB Type-C
HDMI
Hot Shoe Yes

Face à la concurrence

Spec Nikon 1673 Fujifilm X-H2S Sony a7R V Panasonic LUMIX GH7 OM System OM-1 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless
Sensor 20.9MP aps-c 26.2MP aps-c 61MP full-frame 25.2MP micro-four-thirds 20.4MP micro-four-thirds 20.4MP micro-four-thirds
AF Points 209 425 693 315 1053 121
Burst FPS 11 40 10 75 10 15
Video 4K @30fps 6K @120fps 8K @60fps 6K @120fps 4K @60fps 4K @30fps
IBIS true true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 699 579 723 721 511 580
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AFEVFBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayConnectivityPreuve socialeStabilization
Nikon 1673 82.894.976.973.868.785.74685.494.388.775.2
Fujifilm X-H2S Compare 89.496.193.492.697.496.998.398.894.393.394.7
Sony a7R V Compare 94.899.196.376.49577.593.385.494.397.398.4
Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Compare 86.688.996.394.697.161.590.485.494.375.996.5
OM System OM-1 Compare 95.397.583.793.984.446.89585.486.482.686.8
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Compare 81.384.793.590.468.746.892.885.494.399.996.5

Scores par usage

Global (77.1)Video (75.3)Travel (59.7)Youtube (75.2)Beginner (78.8)Vlogging (67.4)Streaming (70.3)Photography (81.6)Wedding Events (64)Sports Wildlife (65.4)Product Photography (84.2)

Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.

Produits similaires