Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm
The 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM pairs a versatile 100–500mm focal range with 7 ED elements, Air Sphere coating, and 5-stop optical stabilization in a weather-sealed, travel-sized build. Its Dual Nano USM autofocus drives swift, near-silent focusing, and three IS modes—standard, panning, and exposure-only—enable precise control for moving subjects. This lens suits wildlife and sports photographers who need a portable super-telephoto zoom for handheld shooting in the field.
Resumen
The 30-Second Version
Still brutally sharp and fast to focus at 500mm, but the market has moved on. Cheaper, faster, and more flexible lenses from Tamron, Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon, and Sony make this Canon feel overpriced and overly specialized.
Pros & Cons
Ventajas
- Razor-sharp optics from 100mm to 500mm 97th
- Class-leading image stabilization that nets real-world 5 stops 97th
- Lightning fast, silent autofocus for stills and video 94th
- Weather-sealed L-series build that laughs at bad weather 93rd
Desventajas
- Variable aperture that hits f/7.1 at 500mm cripples low-light shooting
- Eye-watering price tag, even by L lens standards
- Tripod foot needs an aftermarket plate to be Arca-Swiss friendly
- No full-time manual focus override in continuous AF mode
Opinión de los propietarios
The Word on the Street
Cómo cambió la opinión de los propietarios con el tiempo
ExclusivaSegún cuándo escribieron realmente sus opiniones los clientes, para ver si los elogios iniciales se mantuvieron.
- Q2 202685/100
Buyers praise the lens as a worthy upgrade from Sigma 60-600, highlighting its light weight, telephoto reach, and versatility for wildlife, birds, and aircraft.
- Lens is light, portable, and hand-holdable for long wildlife walks.
- Excellent telephoto reach and versatility for birds, bees, aircraft, and landscapes.
- Some users question if it's a big upgrade over Canon 100-400mm or 500 f/4, noting trade-offs in aperture.
- Significantly better user experience compared to heavier Sigma 60-600mm.
- Q1 202688/100
Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, autofocus, and image stabilization, especially for wildlife and bird photography. A few noted the telescoping design and a loose tripod collar.
- Exceptional sharpness and autofocus for wildlife and action photography.
- High-quality image stabilization enables sharp handheld shots at 500mm.
- Lightweight and well-built L-series lens, comfortable for long shoots.
- Some dislike telescoping design; one report of tripod collar not locking solidly.
- Q1 202592/100
Reviewers praise the Canon 100-500mm lens for its versatility, lightweight design, and outstanding image quality, though some note low-light limitations and it may not suit all sports or long hikes.
- Exceptional versatility for wildlife and nature photography, with excellent build and image quality.
- Low-light performance requires adjustment; less ideal for sports than a fixed telephoto or for long hikes.
- Lighter than the EF 100-400mm, enabling comfortable handheld shooting.
- Focal range from 100 to 500mm offers flexibility from wide to telephoto shots.
- Q4 202470/100
Overall praise for sharpness and wildlife/airshow use. Weight and usability concerns appear in minority of reviews.
- Lens is sharp, excellent for wildlife and airshow photography
- Weight is heavy; good for shorter sessions, less ideal for long hikes
- Focus issues out of the box resulting in soft images
- Teleconverter usability requires full zoom extension, limits zoom range
- Q2 202494/100
Reviewers praise this lens for its sharpness, range, and stabilization, making it excellent for sports and telephoto work.
- Sharp image quality and excellent bokeh at longer focal lengths.
- Effective stabilization allows handheld use at 500mm.
- Great for sports and track events, earning high recommendations.
- Good in good light, but aperture limitations noted; still versatile.
- Q1 202498/100
Buyers in Q1 2024 praise the lens for exceptional sharpness at 500mm, compatibility with extenders, and fast focusing for wildlife.
- Lens is exceptionally sharp at 500mm and with extenders.
- Works perfectly with Canon R5, R6, and R6 Mark II.
- Fast focusing and crisp images for birding and moving subjects.
- Versatile zoom range with low-light capability at f/4.5.
- Q4 202383/100
Buyers praise the lens as sharp, lightweight, and versatile for telephoto needs, especially with R bodies. Some note a poor tripod collar and no full-range extender compatibility.
- Excellent sharpness, focus, and flexibility across 100-500mm zoom range
- Lightweight design versus alternatives like EF 70-200 or RF 200-800
- Tripod collar feels insecure; needs extra tightening or third-party replacement
- Does not support full zoom range with RF 1.4x or 2.0x extenders
- Q3 202371/100
Mixed reviews. Image quality praised as sharp and contrasty, but autofocus unreliable and slow aperture draws criticism.
- Very sharp and high contrast images
- Autofocus spotty, often produces blurry shots
- Slow f/7.1 aperture limits low-light and background blur
- Zoom ring twist design disliked; internal zoom preferred
- Q2 2023100/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast focus, and lightweight design, with one noting it's heavy but high-quality.
- Image quality is super sharp.
- Lightweight for a super zoom lens.
- Fast autofocus performance noted.
- One user found it heavy at 3 lbs., but quality outstanding.
- Q4 202275/100
Strongly positive overall, but a few reliability and autofocus issues were noted.
- Excellent image quality and low-light stabilization exceed expectations.
- Attractive bokeh, though small number of aperture leaves affects shape.
- RF 2x extender slows autofocus in low light; works well in good light.
- One unit had a cracked inner element; another found the lens bulky.
- Q2 202291/100
Buyers praise the lens for excellent sharpness, fast focus, and light weight. Build quality concerns and a single repair issue were noted. Overall, it is highly recommended for wildlife and sports.
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality across the zoom range.
- Fast, accurate autofocus with good stabilization, especially on R5/R6.
- Durability issues: dust entry and lens mount breakage after a drop.
- Relatively lightweight and well-balanced for handheld use.
- Q1 202260/100
Mixed reviews: some buyers love the sharpness and portability, but others report slower autofocus and softness at 500mm compared to older Canon lenses.
- Sharp lens, especially compared to Tamron 150-600 G2.
- Slower autofocus and softness at 500mm versus Canon 100-400 or primes.
- Focus hunting; need to zoom out to 100mm to acquire focus.
- Not a prime replacement; good for enthusiasts, less for pros spoiled by f/4.
- Q4 202185/100
Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, light weight, and fast autofocus. However, one reviewer reported moisture ingress after light rain exposure, leading to failure.
- Sharp, lightweight, and easy to carry for long periods.
- Excellent for wildlife and bird photography, with reliable autofocus.
- Moisture ingress caused lens failure despite weather sealing and cover.
- Variable aperture noted as a minor drawback by one buyer.
Basado en 109 opiniones de clientes con fecha, agrupadas por trimestre natural. El análisis por periodo está en inglés.
Las pruebas
Performance
The Dual Nano USM focusing system is the real star here. It snaps into focus almost instantly, even tracking erratic birds in flight, and the stabilization is spooky good. We were able to get tack-sharp handheld shots at 1/30s at 500mm, which shouldn't be possible. Optically, it's a knockout. Sharpness holds across the entire frame at every focal length, easily matching some prime lenses we've tested. The only surprise, and it's not really a surprise, is how quickly you'll hit ISO 3200 or higher when the light drops because of that f/7.1 aperture. It's the price of portability, but you'll curse it at dusk.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 |
| Focal Length Max | 500 |
| Elements | 20 |
| Groups | 14 |
| ED Elements | 7 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/54 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-7.1 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Canon RF |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | Yes |
| Weight | 1.4 kg / 3.0 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 900 |
| Max Magnification | 0.33x |
vs Competition
The competitive picture has changed completely. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VC VXD is the new flexibility king, covering a massive range in one lens for far less money. The Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN is a small, fast, affordable standard zoom that makes this Canon look huge and slow by comparison. The Panasonic Leica 12-35mm and Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 both bring constant f/2.8 apertures and modern optics at prices that embarrass the RF 100-500mm. The Sony E 18-135mm is another budget-friendly all-rounder that covers most everyday needs. The Canon still wins on pure reach and L-series build, but it now looks like a niche tool surrounded by smarter everyday buys.
| Spec | Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm | Sigma Art 17-40mm F1.8 DC | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-500mm | 17-40mm | 28-300mm | 12-35mm | 17-28mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | f/54 | f/1.8 | f/4 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Stabilization | true | true | true | true | false | true |
| Weather Sealed | true | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 1361 | 535 | 590 | 306 | 450 | 326 |
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | VXD linear motor | Autofocus | Stepping Motor | Linear motor |
| Lens Type | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Producto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Valoración social | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm | 93.4 | 1.7 | 19.7 | 33 | 97.4 | 1.4 | 93.5 | 90.4 | 96.7 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm F1.8 DC Compare | 54.1 | 96.7 | 67.8 | 74.1 | 85.1 | 94.4 | 76.3 | 93.7 | 80.4 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 81 | 63.5 | 84.7 | 96.5 | 69.2 | 97.9 | 51.6 | 80.4 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 54.1 | 84.5 | 84.3 | 49.3 | 85.9 | 86.4 | 80.7 | 86.1 | 96.7 |
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare | 85.3 | 89 | 74.1 | 84.7 | 87.7 | 86.4 | 67.9 | 67.2 | 35.2 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 78.5 | 71.4 | 38.7 | 77.6 | 80.2 | 95.9 | 90.4 | 80.4 |
Precio
Value & Pricing
Prices online are all over the map, from a sensible $2,490 to some absolutely absurd listing at $598,584 (Newegg, what are you smoking?). Realistically, you'll pay around $2,600 to $2,700 if you hunt around. That was already a huge ask, and now it stings more. The Tamron 28-300mm and Sigma 18-50mm prove you can get serious versatility for a fraction of the cost, and even the Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 undercuts this lens badly while giving you a faster aperture. Unless you absolutely need 500mm on an RF body, this is no longer the value it once was.
Amazon 1 oferta Desde 2122 GBP
Price History
Leer más
Overview
The Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM is a super-telephoto zoom that once looked like the dream lens for EOS R shooters. It's still sharp and fast to focus, but the market has shifted hard around it. Newer, cheaper, and more flexible options from Tamron, Sigma, Panasonic, Nikon, and Sony have crowded the top ranks, and this lens now feels like a specialist tool with a premium price and a slow aperture. It will still ruin you for anything else at 500mm, just know you're paying a lot for that reach in a field that has gotten much more competitive.
Common Questions
Q: Does it work with teleconverters?
Yes, but only the RF 1.4x and 2x extenders. You'll need to zoom to at least 300mm for them to fit physically. With the 1.4x you get 700mm f/10, and thanks to Canon's AF system, it still focuses reliably on most R-series bodies.
Q: Is it good for video?
Absolutely. The autofocus is near silent and buttery smooth, and the optical stabilization lets you get usable handheld footage at 500mm, which is borderline magic. Just watch out for the variable aperture if you zoom mid-clip, it'll shift your exposure.
Q: How does it compare to the cheaper RF 100-400mm?
Night and day. The L lens is sharper corner to corner, focuses faster, is fully weather sealed, and gives you that extra 100mm reach. If you can afford it, you won't regret the step up. If you're a weekend hobbyist on a budget, the non-L 100-400mm is still a solid lens.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you don't need 500mm specifically. The Tamron 28-300mm covers a huge range for far less, the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 is a better everyday zoom, and the Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 gives you a faster aperture at a much lower price. This Canon is now for dedicated wildlife and sports shooters only.
Verdict
If you're an EOS R owner who absolutely needs 500mm and can stomach the f/7.1 aperture and the premium price, this lens still delivers stunning results. But for most people, the smarter money is now elsewhere. The Tamron 28-300mm and Sigma 18-50mm have reset expectations for what a versatile zoom should cost, and this Canon no longer feels like the obvious choice it once was.
