New

Gigastone Game Turbo 256GB SATA III 2.5"

★★★★★ 4.6 (375)
Capacity 256GB
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Read Speed 540 MB/s
NAND TLC
Gigastone Game Turbo 256GB SATA III 2.5" ssd
36 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Strong social proof (77th percentile) 77th

Cons

  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)
  • Below average speed (18th percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

What owners think

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
76/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 21 sources · Nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '20: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '20: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '24: 1.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 3.7★ · 3 reviewsQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '25: 3.4★ · 5 reviewsQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 2 reviews1111112113152Q3 '20Q4 '20Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q2 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q3 202560/1003.4★5 reviews

    Buyers report mixed experiences: some praise speed and value, while others cite severe slowness, read/write failures, and one drive failing within weeks.

    • One drive failed after 15-20 days; another reports very slow performance and read/write errors.
    • Several buyers find drives fast, reliable, and suitable for restoring old PCs or as multi-pack value.
    • Performance varies: one user reports good speed, another says very slow even under light use.
  2. Q1 202567/1003.7★3 reviews

    Buyers report strong performance in Proxmox and Xbox use, but one reviewer found SATA drives faster, noting slower read/write times.

    • Great performance in Proxmox VM and ZFS RAID, boosting VM performance.
    • Works well in Xbox, reducing load times significantly after two weeks.
    • Slower read/write times compared to SATA drives, surprising for SSD.

Based on 21 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Performance Percentiles

Speed 17.9
Random 22.4
Feature 53.7
Capacity 17.4
User Sentiment 37.1
Endurance 57.4
Social Proof 77.3
Affordability 59.1

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 256
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Protocol SATA
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 540

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption No

vs Competition

Spec Gigastone Game Turbo Western Digital Black SN850X Samsung 9100 PRO Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Crucial T500 SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100
Capacity 256GB 4TB 4TB 4TB 2TB 8TB
Form Factor 2.5" M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface SATA III PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4
Seq Read 540 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 14,900 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache false true true true true true
Endurance - 2400 TBW 2400 TBW 4000 TBW 1200 TBW 4800 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceSocial ProofAffordability
Gigastone Game Turbo 17.922.453.717.437.157.477.359.1
Western Digital Black SN850X Compare 88.595.28992.594.5889511.5
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 99.199.899.792.5085.999.55.3
Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare 99.498.790.592.528.793.486.86.5
Crucial T500 Compare 93.896.598.978.478.882.99520.1
SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100 Compare 98.999.197.398.194.580.945.43.4

Usage Scores

Overall (36)Budget (65.5)Gaming (22.9)Laptop (36.1)Console (11.3)Portable (8.9)Workstation (32.4)

A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.

Other Configurations4

Similar Products