Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm
Rokinon
35 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm
82 out of 100 high confidence 31 reviews
The Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 manual focus lens is a favorite among astrophotographers and landscape shooters on a budget, delivering sharp images and excellent light-gathering ability for its price. Users consistently praise its value and image quality, though several note that achieving precise focus can be tricky without autofocus or focus confirmation. Minor build concerns like a loose lens mount and cheap hood are mentioned, but overall it's highly recommended for its intended use.
Pros
- Excellent image sharpness
- Great value for the price
- Fast f/2.0 aperture
- Good for astrophotography
- Lightweight build
Cons
- Manual focus only
- Difficult precise focusing
- Focus confirmation not working
- Loose lens mount
- Cheap lens hood
Image quality 14
Value for money 8
Astrophotography performance 10
Manual focus difficulty 7
Build quality 5
Lens mount looseness 2
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 19 |
| Groups | 11 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | UMC | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 8★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Pentax K | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.58 kg | 0.57 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 200 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm
- Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong optical (79th percentile)
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm0.144score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.064score per dollar
Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm offers 2.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
