PNY Quadro P400 2GB GDDR5 workstation
The single-slot, low-profile design with a 30W TDP delivers triple 4K display support via DisplayPort 1.4 without external power, making it a standout for compact professional workstations. Its Pascal-based Quadro P400 chip and 2GB GDDR5 memory provide certified ISV application stability and native 5K output from a single cable at a minimal cost. This card is best for financial traders, digital signage operators, and entry-level CAD users who need reliable multi-monitor setups in space-constrained systems.
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong affordability (94th percentile) 94th
- Strong social proof (89th percentile) 89th
Nachteile
- Below average compute (3rd percentile)
- Below average ai (7th percentile)
- Below average vram (7th percentile)
- Below average rt (10th percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
Basierend auf 13 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Quadro P400 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Pascal |
| Class | workstation |
Memory
| VRAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 64 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 256 |
| Base Clock | 1070 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 1667 |
| GPU Compute | 756 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 30 |
| Cooler | Single Fan |
| Fans | 1 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 3.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| Max Displays | 3 |
| Max Resolution | 5120 x 2880 |
Physical
| Slot Width | 1 |
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.8 lbs |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | PNY Quadro P400 | MSI Ventus GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS XS OC | Gigabyte WINDFORCE GV-N1080WF3OC-8GD | ASRock Challenger A750 CL SE 8GO | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-GTX1660S-O6G-GAMING | EVGA GTX 1070 SC GAMING ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5173-KR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Quadro P400 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1080 | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1070 |
| Vram | 2GB GDDR5 | 6GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR5X | 8GB GDDR6 | 6GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR5 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 1815 | 1797 | 2200 | 1845 | 1784 |
| Tdp W | 30 | 125 | 180 | 225 | 125 | 150 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 64 | 192 | 256 | 256 | 192 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing | - | false | false | true | false | false |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | User Sentiment | Efficiency | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNY Quadro P400 | 7 | 10 | 7.1 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 11.4 | 26.8 | 50.9 | 19.5 | 34.2 | 88.8 | 94.4 |
| MSI Ventus GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS XS OC Compare | 20.1 | 28.5 | 23 | 28.6 | 17.2 | 42.3 | 43.8 | 96.2 | 65 | 46.1 | 95.4 | 78.3 |
| Gigabyte WINDFORCE GV-N1080WF3OC-8GD Compare | 31 | 33.2 | 27.6 | 34 | 26.6 | 42.3 | 91.5 | 27.4 | 43.9 | 46.1 | 78.3 | 74 |
| ASRock Challenger A750 CL SE 8GO Compare | 26.2 | 32.2 | 41.5 | 28.1 | 0 | 72.1 | 56.4 | 45.1 | 19.7 | 74.5 | 65.2 | 85.8 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-GTX1660S-O6G-GAMING Compare | 20.1 | 28.5 | 23 | 28.6 | 17.2 | 42.3 | 43.8 | 71.9 | 65 | 27.1 | 88.8 | 76 |
| EVGA GTX 1070 SC GAMING ACX 3.0 08G-P4-5173-KR Compare | 28 | 26.9 | 25.3 | 30.3 | 21.7 | 29.7 | 56.4 | 71.9 | 49.9 | 46.1 | 73.6 | 65.8 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Amazon 1 Angebot Ab 69 £
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
- Gesamt21.7
- AI/LLM5.3
- Budget50.9
- Gaming 4k7.7
- Ray Tracing7
- Workstation15
- Gaming 1080p14.5
- Gaming 1440p11.3
- Content Creation10.7
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
