Neu
Canon EOS C50 Black
Type mirrorless
Sensor 32.3MP full-frame
Burst 40 fps
Video 6K @120fps
IBIS Ja
Weight 680 g
55 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 £
Keine Angebote verfügbar
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong burst (89th percentile) 89th
- Strong connectivity (86th percentile) 86th
- Strong display (85th percentile) 85th
- Strong video (78th percentile) 78th
Nachteile
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Sensor
| Type | CMOS |
| Size | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 32.3 MP |
| ISO Range | 800 |
Autofocus
| Eye AF | Yes |
| Animal AF | Yes |
| Subject Detection | Yes |
Shooting
| Burst (Mechanical) | 40 |
Video
| Max Resolution | 6K |
| 4K FPS | 120 |
| 1080p FPS | 180 |
| 10-bit | Yes |
| Log Profile | Yes |
| RAW Video | Yes |
| Codec | Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, XF-AVC S, XF-HEVC S |
Display & EVF
| Screen Size | 3" |
| Touchscreen | Yes |
| Articulating | Yes |
Build
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi | Yes |
| USB | USB-C |
| HDMI | HDMI Type A |
| Hot Shoe | Yes |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Canon EOS C50 | Fujifilm X-H2S | Sony a7R V | Panasonic LUMIX GH7 | OM System OM-1 | Nikon Z Z8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | 32.3MP full-frame | 26.2MP aps-c | 61MP full-frame | 25.2MP micro-four-thirds | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds | 45.7MP full-frame |
| AF Points | - | 425 | 693 | 315 | 1053 | 493 |
| Burst FPS | 40 | 40 | 10 | 75 | 10 | 120 |
| Video | 6K @120fps | 6K @120fps | 8K @60fps | 6K @120fps | 4K @60fps | 8K @120fps |
| IBIS | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 680 | 579 | 723 | 721 | 511 | 907 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Nutzerresonanz | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon EOS C50 | 77.3 | 38.1 | 51.3 | 89.2 | 77.7 | 64 | 46 | 85.4 | 86.4 | 52.3 | 75.2 |
| Fujifilm X-H2S Compare | 89.4 | 96.1 | 93.4 | 92.6 | 97.4 | 96.9 | 98.3 | 98.8 | 94.3 | 93.3 | 94.7 |
| Sony a7R V Compare | 94.8 | 99.1 | 96.3 | 76.4 | 95 | 77.5 | 93.3 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 97.3 | 98.4 |
| Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Compare | 86.6 | 88.9 | 96.3 | 94.6 | 97.1 | 61.5 | 90.4 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 75.9 | 96.5 |
| OM System OM-1 Compare | 95.3 | 97.5 | 83.7 | 93.9 | 84.4 | 46.8 | 95 | 85.4 | 86.4 | 82.6 | 86.8 |
| Nikon Z Z8 Compare | 91.3 | 93.6 | 86.8 | 99.8 | 98.6 | 69.9 | 90.1 | 85.4 | 94.3 | 60.9 | 92.6 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
