Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile OC 8GB GDDR7 Black
The Blackwell-based RTX 5060 with 3840 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR7 memory delivers DLSS 4 and solid 1080p gaming in a compact, 182mm triple-fan card. Its low-profile, 2-slot design and 145W TDP make it a rare, powerful drop-in upgrade for slim pre-built systems without sacrificing modern features like AV1 encoding. This card is best for small-form-factor PC builders who need current-gen ray tracing performance in a space-constrained chassis.
لا يوجد سعر حالي لدى المتاجر
لمحة سريعة
The 30-Second Version
The Gigabyte RTX 5060 Low Profile is the most efficient GPU in its class, landing in the 95th percentile for efficiency with a 145W TDP. It hits 20,712 on PassMark G3D and handles 1080p gaming well, all in a 182mm low-profile package. The 8GB VRAM and weak AI scores are the trade-offs, but for SFF builders, this is the best option available right now.
Pros & Cons
الإيجابيات
- 95th percentile efficiency, best-in-class power draw for the performance 95th
- 182mm length and 2-slot design fit almost any SFF or ITX case 84th
- 20,712 PassMark G3D score is solid for a low-profile card 82nd
- 8GB GDDR7 with 448 GB/s bandwidth keeps 1080p gaming smooth 73rd
- Triple-fan cooler delivers 73rd percentile thermals in a tiny package
السلبيات
- 8GB VRAM limits future 1440p and high-texture gaming
- AI and compute scores are weak, ai_llm lands at 36 out of 100
- 145W TDP may still stress compact builds with limited cooling
- Raster performance is only average at the 52nd percentile
- Price spread of USD 191 across vendors means you can overpay easily
آراء المالكين
The Word on the Street
كيف تغيّر رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت
حصرياستنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.
- Q2 202662/100
Mixed reviews: praised for 1080p value and size, but significant driver/crash issues and a PCIe x8 limitation reported.
- Great 1080p gaming value at $299 MSRP, especially for upgrades from GTX-series cards.
- Crashes and driver problems reported, causing some users to switch to AMD cards.
- Only PCIe x8 interface; affects performance with large texture packs.
- Small form factor appreciated, but fan noise under load noted.
- Q1 202685/100
Reviews call it the best low-profile card at a bearable price, effective after undervolting, but note extra heat in compact builds.
- Best low-profile card available, works great for small form factor systems.
- Undervolting recommended; reduces power under 100W and max temp 61°C.
- Extra TDP may require additional cooling in compact builds.
- Not recommended for spacious cases, only for low-profile needs.
استنادًا إلى 16 مراجعة عملاء مؤرخة، مجمّعة حسب الربع التقويمي. تحليل الفترات باللغة الإنجليزية.
الأدلة
Performance
The PassMark G3D score of 20,712 puts this card at the 52nd percentile for raster performance. That's about average, which sounds like a backhanded compliment until you remember the form factor. Most cards scoring higher are full-size, dual-slot-plus behemoths that wouldn't fit in the cases this Gigabyte is built for. The 3840 CUDA cores and 2512MHz boost clock do real work here, and the 448 GB/s memory bandwidth from that 8GB of GDDR7 keeps frame times smooth at 1080p. Our gaming_1080p score of 73 out of 100 backs that up, it's a strong showing for a low-profile card.
Ray tracing lands at the 51st percentile, which is fine but not exciting. The 30 RT cores handle lighter RT workloads okay, but you'll want DLSS 4 doing the heavy lifting in anything demanding. That's not a knock, it's just the reality of a 145W card. The thermal performance sits at the 73rd percentile, which is impressive given the triple-fan cooler on a 182mm board. Gigabyte clearly spent some engineering effort on keeping this thing from turning into a toaster. The efficiency story is the real headline though. 95th percentile means you're getting more frames per watt than almost anything else in our database.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 5060 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Blackwell |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 5 |
Memory
| VRAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bus | 128 |
| Bandwidth | 448 |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 3840 |
| Tensor Cores | 120 |
| RT Cores | 30 |
| Base Clock | 2497 |
| Boost Clock | 2512 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 19.18 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 19.18 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 20712 |
| GPU Compute | 10484 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 145 |
| Recommended PSU | 450 |
| Power Connectors | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Triple Fan |
| Fans | 3 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 |
| DisplayPort | 2 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 182 |
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.3 kg / 0.7 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| Upscaling | DLSS 4 |
| AV1 Encode | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
| RGB | Yes |
vs Competition
Against the ASUS PRIME RTX 5070 Ti and MSI Suprim RTX 5080, this Gigabyte gets absolutely smoked on raw performance. Those cards are in a different league, with 16GB of VRAM and much higher core counts. But they're also full-size cards that cost significantly more and draw way more power. The more interesting comparison is the ZOTAC SOLID SFF OC RTX 5070, which targets a similar small-form-factor audience. The ZOTAC has more VRAM and better raster performance, but it's physically larger and less efficient. The Gigabyte's 95th percentile efficiency and 182mm length make it the better choice for truly constrained builds. The PNY OC RTX 5070 Ti and XFX Mercury RX 9070 XT are both faster, but neither fits in the cases this card is designed for. If you need low-profile, this is basically your only serious option.
| Spec | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile OC | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G | PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | GeForce RTX 5060 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GeForce RTX 5080 |
| Vram | 8GB GDDR7 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR7 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2512 | 2407 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 | 2620 |
| Tdp W | 145 | 575 | 300 | 360 | 339 | 360 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 128 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 384 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| المنتج | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | التقييم الاجتماعي | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile OC | 40.5 | 51.1 | 47.9 | 51.6 | 47 | 84.1 | 72.7 | 95.1 | 81.9 | 69.8 | 46.5 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.8 | 90 | 97.5 | 98.7 | 97.5 | 96.2 | 72.7 | 25.1 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.1 | 92.1 | 85.4 | 88.7 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 73.2 | 94 | 88.8 | 21.4 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.1 | 97.5 | 88.5 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58.1 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.4 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.8 | 96.1 | 91.6 | 83.8 | 95.5 | 84.1 | 91.5 | 52.9 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 15.7 |
| PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare | 85.1 | 97.5 | 88.5 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 58.1 | 94 | 82.5 | 17.7 |
السعر
Value & Pricing
Value is a mixed bag here, and it depends entirely on where you buy. US listings range from USD 360 to USD 551, a spread of USD 191 for the exact same card. That's wild. At USD 360, this is a compelling buy for SFF builders who need the low-profile form factor. At USD 551, you're paying RTX 5070 money for RTX 5060 performance, and that's a bad deal no matter how you slice it. The affordability score sits at the 47th percentile, which is about average for this class. Our budget score of 76.1 out of 100 suggests the card punches above its price when you find it at the lower end of that range. Shop around. Newegg and Best Buy both carry it, and the price gap between listings means a little patience could save you a chunk of change.
اقرأ المزيد
Overview
The Gigabyte RTX 5060 Low Profile hits a PassMark G3D score of 20,712, which lands it right in the middle of the pack for raster performance. That's not a headline-grabbing number, but it's not supposed to be. This card exists for one reason: to be the most powerful GPU you can cram into a tiny case. And on that front, it delivers. 3840 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, and a 2512MHz boost clock, all squeezed into a 182mm card that sips 145W. The efficiency ranking is where this thing shines, sitting in the 95th percentile. That's best-in-class territory, and it matters when you're building in a shoebox.
But let's be real about what this card is not. It's not a 1440p monster. Our gaming_1440p score of 64.3 out of 100 tells you that. It's a 1080p card with some headroom, and the 8GB VRAM ceiling is going to pinch sooner than later. The AI and compute numbers are also pretty weak, with ai_llm scoring just 36 out of 100. If you're dreaming of local LLM tinkering, this isn't your card. If you want a quiet, cool, low-profile GPU that handles modern games at 1080p without melting your ITX case, keep reading.
Common Questions
Q: Will this card fit in my small form factor case?
At 182mm long and 2 slots thick, this is one of the smallest RTX 5060 cards available. It includes a low-profile bracket, so it should fit most ITX and SFF cases. Just make sure your case can handle the 145W TDP and has room for the triple-fan cooler.
Q: Is 8GB of VRAM enough for modern games?
For 1080p gaming, yes. The 8GB GDDR7 with 448 GB/s bandwidth handles current titles at high settings without issue. For 1440p or future games with heavy texture packs, you may hit VRAM limits. Our gaming_1440p score of 64.3 out of 100 reflects that ceiling.
Q: How does this compare to a full-size RTX 5060?
Performance is nearly identical since it uses the same 3840 CUDA cores and 2512MHz boost clock. The difference is the form factor and cooling. The low-profile version trades some thermal headroom for the compact size, but its 73rd percentile thermal ranking shows the triple-fan design handles the 145W TDP well.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this card if you're planning to game at 1440p or higher, or if you want to run local AI models. The 8GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are going to hold you back, and the ai_llm score of 36 out of 100 is one of the weakest in our database. Also skip it if you're building a standard ATX tower with plenty of room. You're paying a premium for the low-profile form factor, and a full-size card at the same price will give you better thermals and more VRAM. And if you find it listed near the USD 551 end of the price range, walk away. That's RTX 5070 territory, and this card can't compete there.
Verdict
The Gigabyte RTX 5060 Low Profile is a niche card that nails its niche. It's not the fastest GPU in our database, not even close. But it's the most efficient, and it delivers genuinely playable 1080p performance in a form factor that almost no other modern card can match. The 95th percentile efficiency ranking is the story here. You're getting a card that won't cook your ITX case or require a beefy PSU, and it still hits 20,712 on PassMark. The 8GB VRAM is the main long-term concern, and the AI performance is a real weak spot. But if you're building a small PC for gaming and everyday use, this is the card to beat. Just don't pay more than USD 400 for it.