AMD FX 9370 8-core AM3+
An unlocked 8-core design with a 4.7GHz boost clock and massive 8MB L2 cache defines this processor, but its 32nm Vishera architecture demands a 220W TDP and robust cooling. The Black Edition multiplier is fully unlocked for overclocking on the legacy AM3+ socket, offering a budget entry into high-thread-count tinkering. This chip is best for enthusiasts building a used AM3+ system for basic multi-threaded productivity, not modern gaming or efficiency-focused tasks.
لا يوجد سعر حالي لدى المتاجر
لمحة سريعة
The 30-Second Version
The FX-9370 is a 220W blast from the past that runs hot and delivers mediocre performance. Unless you're upgrading an existing AM3+ system on a tight budget, this chip is a hard pass.
Pros & Cons
الإيجابيات
- 8 real cores for heavily threaded workloads 77th
- Unlocked multiplier for overclocking fun
- Dirt cheap on the used market
- AM3+ boards are everywhere and inexpensive
السلبيات
- 220W TDP is absurd for the performance
- Single-thread performance is rough
- No upgrade path on AM3+
- Needs serious cooling and a quality motherboard
آراء المالكين
The Word on the Street
كيف تغيّر رأي المالكين بمرور الوقت
حصرياستنادًا إلى وقت كتابة العملاء لتقييماتهم فعليًا - لترى ما إذا كان الثناء المبكر قد استمر.
استنادًا إلى 10 مراجعة عملاء مؤرخة، مجمّعة حسب الربع التقويمي. تحليل الفترات باللغة الإنجليزية.
الأدلة
Performance
The PassMark multi-core score of 6367 puts it right in the middle of the pack, but that single-thread score of 1695 is where the pain lives. Modern games and everyday apps lean hard on single-core speed, and this chip falls behind most budget options from the last five years. The 8MB of L2 cache is generous, but it can't make up for the aging architecture. What surprised us most is how the 4.7GHz boost clock sounds impressive on paper until you realize it needs a beefy cooler and a motherboard that won't catch fire.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | FX |
| Model | 9370 |
| Codename | Vishera |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 32 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 8 |
| Threads | 8 |
| Base Clock | 4400 |
| Boost Clock | 4700 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 8 |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 6367 |
| PassMark Single | 1695 |
Platform & Power
| Socket | AM3+ |
| TDP | 220 |
| Unlocked | Yes |
vs Competition
Against something like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, this FX-9370 looks like it's from another planet, because it basically is. The Ultra 7 destroys it in every metric that matters. Even the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, which is also old silicon, offers better efficiency and platform longevity. The FX-9370's only real competition is other used AM3+ chips, and even then, the FX-8350 gets you most of the performance for less money and less heat.
| Spec | AMD FX 9370 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | SMC EPYC 9555P | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 24 | 32 | 64 | 18 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 24 | 64 | 128 | 36 | 32 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4700 | 5700 | 3500 | 4400 | 4400 | 3900 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 8 | 36 | 256 | 256 | 24.75 | 37.5 |
| Tdp W | 220 | 125 | 200 | 360 | 165 | 195 |
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA 1851 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA2066 | LGA 4677 |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | No | - | - | No |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| المنتج | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | التقييم الاجتماعي | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD FX 9370 | 43 | 62.6 | 17.9 | 32.6 | 44.8 | 76.5 | 55.9 | 41.5 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 95.9 | 97 | 96.2 | 90.4 | 18.4 | 99.9 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 99.1 | 90.9 | 76.4 | 97.4 | 99.1 | 0 | 88.4 | 88.7 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.1 | 96.8 | 88.9 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.2 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare | 97.3 | 62.6 | 82.5 | 99.4 | 99.8 | 72.4 | 7.7 | 95.7 |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.8 | 77.1 | 90.7 | 78.1 | 89.4 | 0 | 2.7 | 79.7 |
السعر
Value & Pricing
At USD 133 to USD 198 across two listings, this is a tough sell even for budget builders. The spread between vendors is significant, and the cheaper listing is the only one worth considering if you absolutely must have this chip. But honestly, a used Ryzen 5 or even a newer Core i3 will run circles around this thing for similar money. The value proposition only makes sense if you already own an AM3+ board and just need a drop-in upgrade.
اقرأ المزيد
Overview
The AMD FX-9370 is a relic from a time when AMD threw wattage at a problem and hoped for the best. It's an 8-core Vishera chip running at 4.4GHz base and 4.7GHz boost, but those cores are ancient 32nm silicon that struggles to keep up with even budget modern processors. The one thing to know: this is a 220W space heater that happens to do some computing on the side.
Common Questions
Q: Do I need a special cooler for the FX-9370?
Yes, absolutely. This thing pulls 220W, so you need a serious air cooler or a decent AIO liquid cooler. The stock cooler situation is basically nonexistent for this chip, so budget for cooling.
Q: Can I play modern games on this CPU?
You can, but don't expect great frame rates. The single-thread performance is the bottleneck, and most modern games will stutter or underperform. It's fine for older titles or esports games at lower settings.
Q: Is the FX-9370 worth buying in 2024?
Only if you already have an AM3+ motherboard and need a cheap upgrade. For a new build, no. A used Ryzen 5 or even a budget Intel chip will give you way better performance per dollar and a real upgrade path.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a new PC for gaming or everyday productivity, skip this entirely. Go grab a used Ryzen 5 3600 or a Core i3-12100F instead. You'll get better performance, way lower power draw, and an actual upgrade path. This chip is only for AM3+ owners who refuse to let go.
Verdict
Don't buy this unless you're building a nostalgia rig or already have an AM3+ motherboard collecting dust. The 220W power draw, weak single-thread performance, and dead-end platform make it a bad choice for anyone building a new system in 2024. If you need cheap cores for rendering, save up a little more and grab a used Ryzen instead.
