Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 APS-C
Com estabilização óptica de 4 stops e motor STM silencioso, esta lente zoom de 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 mantém fotos nítidas em baixa luz com apenas 56g, ideal para o dia a dia. Apesar do preço acessível, oferece um elemento asférico e revestimentos que garantem boa qualidade de imagem, com foco mínimo de 250mm para close-ups versáteis. Melhor para fotógrafos iniciantes com câmeras Canon APS-C que priorizam orçamento e fotografia de rua sem abrir mão da estabilização.
Sem preço atual de lojas
Resumo
The 30-Second Version
The Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III is a lightweight budget zoom with surprisingly good autofocus but soft optics and no image stabilization. It works fine for outdoor daylight shooting but struggles indoors and at the long end. If you can find the IS version for a similar price, get that instead.
Pros & Cons
Prós
- Fast and quiet Micro USM autofocus 89th
- Extremely lightweight at 59g 86th
- Versatile 18-55mm zoom range 84th
- Very affordable at USD 129-199 84th
- Compact enough for everyday carry
Contras
- No image stabilization on this version
- Soft focus and poor color rendition reported by owners
- Plasticky build feels cheap in hand
- Slow f/3.5-5.6 aperture struggles indoors
- Image quality degrades noticeably at 55mm
O que dizem os donos
The Word on the Street
Como a opinião dos donos mudou ao longo do tempo
ExclusivoCom base em quando os clientes realmente escreveram suas avaliações - para ver se os elogios iniciais se mantiveram.
- Q1 202672/100
Buyers generally praise the lens for its value, image stabilization, and image quality for the price. A few report mixed experiences with durability and zoom range.
- Image stabilization works well, especially in low light, and is quiet.
- Good value for price; surprisingly good image quality for a kit lens.
- Cheap construction; lightweight plastic body, but some report decent toughness.
- One review indicates the lens worked well only for a limited time before failing.
- Q2 202550/100
Reviews are mixed: some praise the lens as a great starter, while others report autofocus failure and note plastic mounts and missing serial number.
- Works perfectly as a replacement lens and great starter lens.
- Original lens ceased to autofocus, requiring replacement.
- Plastic mounts with limited metal contact raise durability concerns.
- Serial number not printed on lens, only in photo metadata.
- Q4 202250/100
Mixed reviews: some praise fast autofocus and wide zoom, but a serious defect report notes soft focus and field curvature.
- Fast autofocus and wide-angle zoom range praised by satisfied buyers.
- Field curvature causes soft, lifeless focus; center and edge sharpness mismatched.
- Good condition, prompt delivery, and useful image stabilizer noted.
- Enjoyable for serious work, exceptional quality described by users.
- Q4 201450/100
Buyers praised the camera as a great choice and fun to use, but one reviewer strongly criticized the included kit lens for poor build quality and loud noise during video.
- Camera praised as best choice, takes beautiful pictures, and is fun to use.
- Kit lens criticized for cheap build, loud noise, and being useless for video without external mic.
- One buyer happy with camera but disappointed with kit lens, had to buy STM version for video.
- Lens described as nice, though user still learning to use it.
- Q2 201480/100
Buyers praised this lens for versatility in portraits and everyday use, especially for its low weight and value. Some noted it's not the fastest lens but good for the price.
- Versatility for portraits and general photography, often used as a walk-around lens.
- Good value for the price, inexpensive compared to other lenses owned.
- Low weight and compact, ideal for daily or travel use.
- Not the fastest lens, but adequate for standard focal range photography.
- Q1 201432/100
Buyers found this lens lightweight with good compatibility and silent STM autofocus, but many reported soft corners, slow autofocus, and reliability concerns.
- Top corners extremely soft; one reviewer noted it was worse than the old version.
- Autofocus is slow and easily broken; one unit had autofocus failure.
- Silent STM motor praised for video; lightweight and good compatibility with Canon DSLRs.
- Build quality improved over original (tighter focus ring, pinch-type cap) but still feels cheap.
- Q1 201370/100
Q1 2013 buyers find this kit lens a good, versatile starter for learning DSLR, though autofocus hunts and sharpness is soft.
- Great versatile starter lens for learning DSLR photography.
- Autofocus hunts and is slow, especially in low light.
- Sharpness is soft compared to higher-end alternatives.
- Build feels cheap, though expected for kit lens price.
- Q4 201277/100
Buyers found this lens sharp, versatile, and a good value, but noted noisy autofocus for video and a flimsy build.
- Sharp images and good versatility for macro, portraits, and outdoor use.
- Autofocus noise is loud and distracting when recording video.
- Build feels flimsy but delivers decent quality for the low price.
- Auto-focus slow and misses in low light; images not as sharp as preferred.
- Q3 201267/100
Buyers praised the lens as lightweight, sharp, and affordable, though some found the kit lens limited for specific uses like portraits or night shots.
- Lightweight, sharp image quality, and good value for beginners.
- Sharp at 18mm but image quality drops off at 55mm.
- Kit lens not ideal for portraits; some prefer prime lenses instead.
- Limited in low-light situations and durability concerns if dropped.
- Q2 2012100/100
Buyers praised the lens for sharp photos, fast autofocus, and good value. Some noted autofocus hunting in low contrast conditions.
- Sharp, crisp photos and good image quality
- Fast and precise autofocus performance
- Great value and affordable price
- Autofocus may hunt or fail in low contrast scenes
- Q1 201250/100
Buyers praised the lens for indoor shots and value, but reported autofocus failure after a year and poor photo quality.
- Great for indoor shots and good value for personal photography.
- Autofocus stopped working after a year; build quality concerns.
- Disappointed with photo quality; suggests buying a different lens instead.
- Good image quality initially, but reliability issues over time.
- Q4 201170/100
Buyers praised the lens as a great starter with excellent image quality and value, but one reported autofocus degradation and dust accumulation over time.
- Excellent image quality and value for a starter lens.
- Autofocus became slow and inaccurate over time.
- Dust and hairs accumulated on sensor despite never removing lens.
- Good low-light performance and flexibility for outdoor shooting.
- Q3 201180/100
Buyers in Q3 2011 found the lens ideal for beginners, versatile, and sharp, though some noted its low cost and potential inconsistency.
- Ideal for beginners, light and versatile
- Fast and sharp image quality
- Good value, inexpensive lens
- Inconsistent quality noted, good copies praised
- Q1 201160/100
Buyers find this a decent starter lens with good IS and range, but cite small apertures, fish-eye effect, and a need to upgrade for better quality.
- Good for beginners but prompts upgrade to prime lenses for larger apertures.
- Small apertures require raising ISO; limits low-light and creative photography.
- Fish-eye effect noted in some shots, distorting images unexpectedly.
- Image stabilization present but considered unnecessary by some reviewers.
- Q3 201073/100
Buyers found this lens a good value walk-around lens with sharp images and IS, but noted softness at wide apertures and indoor blur.
- Good value, sharp images, effective IS, lightweight, and convenient for travel.
- Sharpness is decent but best at f/8 and up; not as sharp as higher-end lenses.
- Indoor blur even with IS; slow aperture (f/5.6 at 55mm) limits low-light use.
- Decent starter lens but quickly outgrown; better options exist for body-only buyers.
- Q2 201093/100
Buyers praised this lens as a versatile, affordable entry-level option for macro, landscape, and portrait photography, ideal for beginners.
- Versatile for macro, landscape, and portrait photography.
- Good value and affordable entry-level lens.
- Works well for short focal length subjects like trains and architecture.
- May be outgrown as skills advance, but useful for learning.
- Q1 201075/100
Buyers praised the lens as a great value for beginners, with good image quality and IS. Some noted limitations: lack of USM, small aperture, and short focal range.
- Excellent value and image quality for the price, especially for beginners.
- Lack of USM motor and small aperture (f/5.6 at 55mm) are common drawbacks.
- Image stabilization (IS) is effective, adding two stops of safe shutter speeds.
- Focus range sometimes insufficient; 55mm may not be enough for some users.
- Q4 200980/100
Buyers praised the lens as a good value, lightweight, and versatile for everyday use, but noted reliability issues with stabilization and a rotating barrel that complicates filter use.
- Good value, lightweight, and versatile for everyday photography.
- Stabilization broke after about 3000 shots; reliability concern.
- Rotating barrel makes using polarizer and ND filters time-consuming.
- Refurbished lens arrived in like-new condition and works perfectly.
Com base em 113 avaliações de clientes datadas, agrupadas por trimestre civil. A análise por período está em inglês.
As provas
Performance
Let's talk numbers. In our database, this lens ranks in the 99th percentile for build quality among all lenses we track, which sounds impressive until you remember that most of the competition at this price point is plastic fantastic territory. The autofocus performance is a genuine standout, landing in the 93rd percentile. The Micro USM motor is fast and quiet, which makes a real difference when you're tracking moving subjects or shooting video. Versatility sits at the 83rd percentile, which makes sense given the 18-55mm range covers a lot of ground.
Optical performance is where things get more average. The lens scores in the 56th percentile for optical quality, which translates to solid but unspectacular results. Sharpness is decent in the center at f/8, but corners get soft, especially at 55mm. The f/3.5 maximum aperture at 18mm is fine for outdoor daylight, but this lens struggles indoors without a flash. Bokeh is nothing to write home about at the 78th percentile, which is expected from a slow kit zoom. Macro capability lands at 74th percentile, so close-up shots are possible but you'll want those macro filter attachments if you're serious about it.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 |
| Focal Length Max | 55 |
| Elements | 13 |
| Groups | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 |
| Coating | optimized lens coatings |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Min Aperture | f/22-38 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
Build
| Mount | Canon EF-S |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | No |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 58 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | STM |
| Stabilization | Yes |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 250 |
| Max Magnification | 0.36x |
vs Competition
Stacked against the Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS, the Canon falls behind in a few key areas. The Sony includes optical stabilization, which makes a huge difference for handheld shooting in anything less than bright sunlight. The Sony is also a pancake-style power zoom, so it's even more compact. But the Canon's Micro USM autofocus is faster and quieter than the Sony's motor, so if you're shooting action or video, the Canon has an edge there.
The Viltrox AF 85mm f/1.8 and Yongnuo YN50mm F1.8S are both prime lenses, so they're not direct competitors in terms of zoom range, but they're worth mentioning because they're in a similar budget bracket. If you care about image quality and low light performance, a cheap prime will blow this kit zoom out of the water. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 is a superzoom that costs more but covers way more range. For pure versatility, the Tamron wins, but it's heavier and pricier. The Canon's real competition is the IS version of itself, and that's a fight it loses.
| Spec | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD | Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 | Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art | Sony G SEL16F18G | Nikon NIKKOR 2191 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 18-55mm | 35mm | 85mm | 28mm | 16mm | 28-300mm |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/1.4 | f/1.8 | f/1.4 | f/1.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Canon EF | Sony E | Nikon F | Sony E | Nikon F |
| Format Coverage | APS-C | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame |
| Stabilization | true | false | true | false | false | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 205 | 815 | 452 | 865 | 304 | 82 |
| AF Type | STM | USD | Linear Autofocus Motor | HSM | XD linear motors | Silent Wave Motor |
| Lens Type | zoom | prime | prime | prime | prime | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produto | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Reach | Video | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Wide Angle | Portability | Versatility | Prova social | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 | 68.8 | 22 | 64.4 | 74.8 | 68.2 | 86.2 | 47.4 | 26.4 | 16.5 | 59.6 | 84 | 83.6 | 81.7 | 78.6 | 88.9 |
| Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Compare | 83.6 | 57.8 | 77.4 | 52.1 | 29.4 | 28.7 | 93 | 88.9 | 81.8 | 53.2 | 23.9 | 33 | 87.9 | 36.8 | 36.1 |
| Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 Compare | 95.4 | 82.9 | 77.4 | 29.1 | 65.9 | 72.4 | 48.2 | 74.8 | 92.7 | 19.7 | 56.1 | 33 | 87.9 | 34.5 | 82.6 |
| Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Compare | 83.6 | 48.1 | 77.4 | 47.3 | 21.7 | 28.7 | 96.9 | 88.9 | 81.8 | 62.4 | 21.7 | 33 | 52.9 | 49.3 | 36.1 |
| Sony G SEL16F18G Compare | 95.4 | 22 | 90.7 | 63.3 | 7.5 | 72.4 | 88.1 | 74.8 | 66.5 | 88.3 | 73.8 | 33 | 87.9 | 46.2 | 36.1 |
| Nikon NIKKOR 2191 Compare | 83.6 | 69.7 | 66.2 | 72 | 87.6 | 63.4 | 90.1 | 26.4 | 0 | 62.4 | 97.6 | 98.1 | 69.7 | 44.6 | 92.9 |
Preço
Value & Pricing
At USD 129 to USD 199 depending on where you shop, the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III is cheap enough that you won't lose sleep over the purchase. The Newegg listing with the bundled accessories sits at the lower end of that range, which makes it the better deal if you want the wide angle and macro attachments thrown in. But here's the thing: the IS version of this same lens exists and owners consistently say it's better, even with stabilization turned off. If you can find the IS variant for a similar price, skip this one. For the money, you're getting a functional zoom that works fine outdoors in good light, but the lack of stabilization and the soft optics mean you're paying for convenience, not quality.
Acompanhamos os preços deste produto desde 4 de mai. de 2026. O gráfico aparecerá quando tivermos mais dados.
Saiba mais
Overview
The Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III is one of those lenses that shows up in a lot of camera bags but rarely gets talked about with much excitement. It's the classic kit zoom for Canon's APS-C DSLR lineup, covering the 18-55mm range that handles everything from wide-ish street shots to short telephoto portraits. This particular version, the III, is the non-IS variant, which means you're getting the basic optical formula without Canon's image stabilization. Prices in our database bounce between USD 129 and USD 199 depending on the vendor, so it sits firmly in budget territory.
Is the Canon EF-S 18-55mm good for beginners? Honestly, yes, with some caveats. The zoom range is practical, the autofocus uses Micro USM which is snappier than the older kit lenses, and it weighs almost nothing at 59g. But the f/3.5-5.6 aperture means you'll be fighting for light indoors, and the lack of stabilization makes handheld shooting at slower shutter speeds a real challenge.
We see a lot of these bundled with accessories too. Some listings throw in a 58mm wide angle adapter, macro close-up filters, and a pouch. Those extras are fun to play with but don't expect miracles from screw-on glass. The core lens is what matters, and that's where this review focuses.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III good for beginners?
Yes, it's a solid starter lens for learning the basics. The zoom range is versatile and the autofocus is fast, but you'll want to shoot mostly outdoors in good light since the slow aperture and lack of stabilization make indoor handheld shots tricky.
Q: Does the Canon EF-S 18-55mm III have image stabilization?
No, this version does not include image stabilization. Canon makes an IS version of this same lens, and owners consistently report it's worth the extra money, even if you don't think you need the stabilization.
Q: What's the difference between the Canon 18-55mm III and the IS version?
The IS version adds optical image stabilization, which helps reduce blur from camera shake at slower shutter speeds. Reviewers also note the IS version has better build quality and a larger front element, and many say it produces sharper images even with stabilization turned off.
Q: Can I use the Canon EF-S 18-55mm for macro photography?
It's not a true macro lens, but it can focus as close as 280mm, which lets you get decent close-up shots. Some bundles include 58mm macro filter attachments that screw onto the front and let you focus even closer, though image quality takes a hit with those.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this lens if you shoot indoors, in low light, or care about image sharpness. The f/3.5-5.6 aperture combined with no stabilization means you'll be cranking ISO or reaching for a tripod more often than you'd like. If you're into portraits or want creamy bokeh, grab a cheap prime like the Yongnuo YN50mm F1.8S instead. And if you're buying this as an upgrade from the kit lens that came with your Rebel, don't bother. The improvements are marginal, and the IS version or a used Tamron zoom will serve you better.
Verdict
Should you buy the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III? If you're getting it for free with a camera body, sure, use it. It's a perfectly fine lens for learning on. But if you're spending your own money, we'd say hold out for the IS version or save up for something better. The autofocus is genuinely good, and the lens is so light you'll forget it's on your camera. But the soft optics, lack of stabilization, and plasticky feel add up to a lens that feels like a compromise.
For casual outdoor shooting in good light, this lens does the job. For anything more demanding, it falls short. The user sentiment score of 72/100 with a 16th percentile ranking against other lenses tells the story: people who buy this as an upgrade from the kit lens are often disappointed, while people who get it bundled and have low expectations are mostly fine with it.
Usage Scores
- Macro54.6
- Geral52.3
- Budget89.5
- Street61
- Travel74.6
- Portrait37.3
- Landscape58.1
- Professional40.7
- Video Cinema63.9
- Wildlife Sports39.7
