Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm
The 91mm-equivalent focal length and bright f/2.4 aperture provide a versatile short telephoto field of view with strong subject isolation, aided by a 9-blade diaphragm. Its compact 215g build and Super EBC-coated optics, which include one aspherical and one ED element, deliver sharp, flare-resistant images in a highly portable form factor. This lens is best for Fujifilm X-mount photographers who prioritize a lightweight, dual-purpose prime for detailed 1:2 macro work and portraiture.
Overzicht
The 30-Second Version
Sharp, tiny, and built like a little tank, but the autofocus is slow enough to make you check your pulse. Great travel lens, mediocre macro lens.
Pros & Cons
Pluspunten
- Compact and lightweight at 215g, easy to toss in a bag 83rd
- Sharp optics with great color and contrast 74th
- Solid metal build, even the hood feels premium
- Doubles as a decent short telephoto for portraits
Minpunten
- Autofocus is slow and hunts in low light
- No image stabilization, handheld macro gets shaky
- Only 0.5x magnification, not true 1:1 macro
- Bokeh is underwhelming for a prime
Wat eigenaren vinden
The Word on the Street
Hoe de mening van eigenaren in de loop van de tijd veranderde
ExclusiefOp basis van wanneer klanten hun reviews daadwerkelijk schreven - zo zie je of de eerste lof standhield.
- Q3 201962/100
Buyers praised the lens as lightweight, sharp, and a good value for beginners, but noted slow autofocus, especially in macro, and lack of image stabilization in low light.
- Lightweight, sharp, good contrast, and build quality; versatile as a portrait lens.
- Slow autofocus, particularly in macro; some wished for longer focal length.
- No image stabilization, making handheld low-light shooting difficult.
- Good value for beginners, especially when bought on sale; a good starting macro lens.
- Q2 201967/100
Buyers praise the lens's compact size, light weight, and sharp image quality, but consistently criticize its slow autofocus and hunting in low light. Some recommend it as a versatile portrait/macro combo, while one questions if the optical quality justifies the focus frustrations.
- Autofocus is slow, sometimes painfully so, and hunts in low light, causing frustration.
- Lens is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry and fit in small bags.
- Image quality is excellent, sharp edge to edge, and works well for portraits and close-ups.
- Not true 1:1 macro, but serves as a good compromise for those wanting both portrait and macro capabilities.
- Q2 201482/100
Buyers praised the lens for being lightweight, well-built, and great for macro shots, though autofocus is slow.
- Lightweight and easy to use for close-ups and macro.
- Well-built and possibly sharper than the X-Trans sensor.
- Autofocus is a little slow but image quality is great.
- Q1 201480/100
Buyers in Q1 2014 found the lens sharp with pleasing bokeh, especially after firmware updates improved autofocus. Macro performance was a mixed point, with some noting limitations in low light and magnification.
- Image quality praised: tack-sharp, excellent bokeh, bright colors, and good for portraits.
- Autofocus improved after firmware update but still not fastest; hunts in low light, manual focus preferred.
- Macro capability decent but limited (0.5x magnification), not a true macro lens for some users.
- Build quality excellent, compact and light, good value at current pricing.
Gebaseerd op 37 gedateerde klantreviews, gegroepeerd per kalenderkwartaal. Analyse per periode is in het Engels.
De feiten
Performance
Optically, this thing punches above its weight. The 10 elements in 8 groups with one aspherical and one ED element keep things crisp, and the Super EBC coating does its job against flare. Sharpness is genuinely impressive for a lens this small. But the autofocus is the story here. It's slow, it hunts in low light, and it makes noise while doing it. Owners consistently mention firmware updates helping a bit, but this is a lens you'll want to manual focus when things get dim. The 0.5x magnification is fine for flowers and product shots, but don't expect true 1:1 macro. Bokeh sits in the bottom quarter of our database, so portrait shooters looking for creamy backgrounds should temper expectations.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Type | Macro |
| Focal Length Min | 60 |
| Focal Length Max | 60 |
| Elements | 10 |
| Groups | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 |
| Coating | Super EBC |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.4 |
| Constant | No |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 39 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 267 |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x |
vs Competition
Against the Fuji XF 80mm f/2.8 macro, this 60mm loses on magnification and AF speed but wins on size and price. The 80mm is the serious macro tool, the 60mm is the casual one. If you're cross-shopping the Meike 85mm f/1.4 II, that lens gives you way better bokeh and a faster aperture for portraits, but no autofocus at all. The Yongnuo 23mm f/1.4 is a completely different animal, wide and fast for street work, not a macro option. For Fuji shooters who want a compact short telephoto with occasional macro duties, this 60mm still makes sense. For dedicated macro work, get the 80mm.
| Spec | Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Nikon NIKKOR 20059 | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 60mm | 28-300mm | 18-55mm | 17-40mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm |
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 | f/3.5 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E | Nikon F | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | false | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | false | true | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 215 | 590 | 205 | 535 | 306 | 326 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | VXD linear motor | pulse stepping motor | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | Autofocus | Linear motor |
| Lens Type | macro | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | User Sentiment | Versatility | Gebruikersoordeel | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm | 53.9 | 25.2 | 82.7 | 53.7 | 61.9 | 21.9 | 16.5 | 33.2 | 73.5 | 34.4 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 83.7 | 63 | 83.2 | 96.3 | 71 | 92.2 | 97.9 | 50.7 | 79.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare | 84.8 | 81.4 | 83.7 | 95.3 | 54.6 | 82.8 | 65.7 | 82.9 | 86.2 | 92.3 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 53.9 | 97 | 67.1 | 72.2 | 96.6 | 95.3 | 98.3 | 75.8 | 94.1 | 34.4 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.9 | 86.7 | 83.9 | 49 | 86.2 | 88.4 | 92.2 | 80.5 | 86.2 | 96.4 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 81.4 | 71 | 37.5 | 78 | 82.8 | 47.9 | 95.8 | 90.7 | 79.3 |
Prijs
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop. In Europe you'll see anywhere from EUR 377 to EUR 671, which is a wild spread for the same lens. If you're buying in the EU, hunt for the lower end of that range, the EUR 377 listings are the real deal. In the US it sits around USD 779 to USD 840, which feels steep for a lens with this many compromises. In Canada you're looking at CAD 869 to CAD 1,077, again a big gap. The lens is good, but at the high end of these ranges you're paying too much for what you get.
Amazon 1 aanbieding Vanaf € 380
Price History
Lees meer
Overview
The Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro is a weird little lens that does a lot of things well and one thing pretty badly. It's tiny, sharp, and built like a tank, but the autofocus is slow enough that you'll sometimes wonder if it's still working. Think of it as a 91mm equivalent prime that happens to do 0.5x macro, not a dedicated macro monster. If you can live with the AF, the image quality will make you forget the wait.
Common Questions
Q: Is this a true 1:1 macro lens?
No, it tops out at 0.5x magnification. You'll get half life-size, which is fine for flowers and product shots but won't fill the frame with a bug's eyeball. For true 1:1 on Fuji X, look at the XF 80mm f/2.8 macro.
Q: How bad is the autofocus really?
It's slow. In good light it's usable, but in low light it hunts back and forth and makes noise. Firmware updates help a bit, but this is not a lens for fast action or dim interiors. Manual focus is smooth and precise, so many owners just switch to that.
Q: Does it work well for portraits?
It's decent. The 91mm equivalent focal length is flattering, and sharpness is great. But the f/2.4 max aperture and mediocre bokeh mean you won't get that dreamy background separation. It works in a pinch, but a dedicated portrait lens will do better.
Who Should Skip This
If you're serious about macro photography, this isn't your lens. The 0.5x magnification and slow autofocus will drive you nuts when you're trying to nail focus on a moving subject. Get the Fuji XF 80mm f/2.8 macro instead. And if you want a portrait lens with beautiful bokeh, the Meike 85mm f/1.4 II or even Fuji's own 56mm f/1.2 will serve you far better.
Verdict
The XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro is a lens you buy for its size and image quality, not its autofocus. It's a great travel companion that can do close-up work in a pinch, and the sharpness is genuinely lovely. But if macro is your main thing, the 0.5x magnification and sluggish AF will frustrate you. At the right price, especially those lower EUR listings, it's a solid buy. At full retail, it's harder to justify.
