Sony FE SEL50F18F 50mm

★★★★★ 4.6 (7,424)

Delivering a 75mm equivalent portrait perspective on APS-C bodies, this compact 202g lens pairs a bright f/1.8 aperture with built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization for 4 stops of shake reduction. Its lightweight build and smooth, quiet autofocus make it a discreet and affordable option for everyday shooting. This lens is best for travel and portrait photographers using Sony E-mount crop-sensor cameras who want sharp, stabilized images in a highly portable package.

Focal length 50mm
Aperture f/1.8
Mount Sony E
stabilization はい
Weather Sealed はい
Weight 186 g
af type DC motor
lens type prime
Sony FE SEL50F18F 50mm lens
81 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

The Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS scores 56.5 out of 100, with stabilization in the 93rd percentile and build quality in the 92nd. Bokeh is a weak spot at 14th percentile, and optical quality is just average. At the low end of its $159 to $450 US price range, it's a decent stabilized portrait prime for APS-C shooters.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 4-stop stabilization ranks in the 93rd percentile, rare for a budget prime 95th
  • Build quality in the 92nd percentile, feels solid despite the low price 94th
  • Only 202g, easy to carry all day on an APS-C body 93rd
  • 75mm equivalent focal length is flattering for portraits on crop sensors 92nd
  • 49mm filter thread keeps accessory costs low

短所

  • Bokeh quality in the 14th percentile, background blur can look harsh
  • Aperture ranking of 21st percentile, f/1.8 is nothing special for a prime
  • Optical quality at 48th percentile, just average sharpness
  • Macro capability at 35th percentile, 0.16x magnification is limited
  • Autofocus at 54th percentile, not slow but not impressive either

オーナーの声

The Word on the Street

4.6/5 (7424 reviews)
👍 Many buyers on Sony a6000 bodies report being impressed with the image quality, especially for outdoor and low-light portraits.
👍 A common theme is that this lens is a significant upgrade from the kit lens, with users noting sharper results and better subject isolation.
🤔 Some owners mention that sharpness wide open at f/1.8 is not perfect, but they find it acceptable for the price and focal length.

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '17: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ2 '17: 4.9★ · 8 レビューQ3 '17: 4.8★ · 6 レビューQ4 '17: 4.5★ · 4 レビューQ1 '18: 5.0★ · 7 レビューQ2 '18: 4.8★ · 4 レビューQ3 '18: 4.7★ · 6 レビューQ4 '18: 4.7★ · 6 レビューQ1 '19: 4.8★ · 13 レビューQ2 '19: 4.3★ · 16 レビューQ3 '19: 4.3★ · 15 レビューQ4 '19: 4.6★ · 7 レビューQ1 '20: 4.4★ · 5 レビューQ2 '20: 4.8★ · 4 レビューQ3 '20: 4.9★ · 8 レビューQ4 '20: 4.7★ · 9 レビューQ1 '21: 4.6★ · 15 レビューQ2 '21: 4.7★ · 9 レビューQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 5 レビューQ4 '21: 5.0★ · 7 レビューQ1 '22: 4.8★ · 4 レビューQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 5 レビューQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ1 '23: 4.7★ · 3 レビューQ3 '23: 4.7★ · 8 レビューQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ2 '24: 4.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 3 レビューQ4 '24: 3.7★ · 3 レビューQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 5 レビューQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 4 レビューQ1 '26: 4.7★ · 8 レビューQ2 '26: 4.9★ · 9 レビュー386474661316157548915957425338213352489Q1 '17Q4 '17Q3 '18Q2 '19Q1 '20Q4 '20Q3 '21Q2 '22Q1 '23Q2 '24Q1 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数
  1. Q4 202583/1005.0★9 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens's sharpness, color quality, and value for beginners, though some noted plastic build, chromatic aberration, and occasional autofocus quirks.

    • Sharpness and image quality highly rated, with creamy bokeh and vibrant colors.
    • Great value for price, ideal as a beginner or multipurpose lens.
    • Build quality: plastic body not premium, but acceptable for the price point.
    • Some users noted chromatic aberration and occasional autofocus inconsistency.
  2. Q3 202560/1004.7★5 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for its compact size, low-light performance, and bokeh, but note plastic build, noisy autofocus, and crop sensor field-of-view considerations.

    • Great low light f/1.8 aperture, sharp wide open, and buttery bokeh for portraits.
    • Autofocus is noisy for video but acceptable for stills; plastic build but lightweight.
    • Autofocus could be faster in demanding moments; motor noise may affect video.
    • On crop sensor, 50mm gives 80mm equivalent field of view, not standard 50mm.
  3. Q1 202590/1005.0★5 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens as a great budget option for portraits, daily snaps, and video, highlighting sharp images, smooth autofocus, and good compatibility with Sony cameras.

    • Excellent for portraits and everyday photography
    • Sharp images and good color reproduction
    • Smooth autofocus and effective optical stabilization
    • Good value for the price with versatile use
  4. Q3 202387/1004.6★9 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens as sharp, fast-focusing, and a great value for portraits and everyday use, though some note the plastic build and lack of an MF/AF switch. One reviewer's identical lens failed, but they still bought it again.

    • Sharp, fast autofocus, and good value for the price.
    • All-plastic build and no MF/AF switch are drawbacks.
    • Effective stabilization and decent close-up focus for a non-macro lens.
    • One reviewer's lens failed, requiring a replacement.
  5. Q3 2022100/1005.0★5 レビュー

    Buyers in this period praised the lens as a sharp, affordable option for portraits. One reported purple fringing but still rated it 5 stars.

    • Great value for the price, ideal for beginners and portraits.
    • One lens exhibited purple fringing, possibly a manufacturing defect.
    • Sharp image quality, especially for portraits and general use.
    • User reported purple fringing; requested manufacturer assistance.
  6. Q4 202185/1005.0★7 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its quality, versatility, and value, citing sharp bokeh, low-light performance, and compatibility. One reviewer criticized Sony's cashback policy.

    • Lens quality praised: sharp, lightweight, durable, great for beginners and pros.
    • Low-light capability valued: excellent with f/1.8 aperture for dark conditions.
    • One buyer threatened to boycott Sony due to a cashback dispute.
    • Versatile for both photography and videography, including underwater use.
  7. Q3 2021100/1005.0★5 レビュー

    Buyers praise this lens as affordable, sharp, and excellent for portraits and video, with some noting loud autofocus.

    • Excellent value for the price, especially for beginners.
    • Sharp image quality and lightweight, great for portraits.
    • Good for cinematic video quality.
    • Autofocus can be loud at times.
  8. Q2 202189/1004.6★11 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens as a great value, sharp, and ideal for beginners. Some note autofocus limits and high price.

    • Great value for the price, sharp images, and good for beginners.
    • Autofocus hunts a little and is not very fast in some situations.
    • Compact, lightweight design with decent stabilization; some find it pricey.
    • Ideal portrait lens with good bokeh and low-light performance.
  9. Q1 202182/1004.6★15 レビュー

    Buyers in Q1 2021 praise the lens as a great-value prime offering sharp images, good bokeh, and fast autofocus. Some note noisy autofocus, indoor crop limitations, and one reported a defective focus ring.

    • Excellent value for money, sharp images with creamy bokeh.
    • Autofocus is fast and silent but noisy according to some users.
    • 50mm fixed focal length is cropped, making indoor use difficult.
    • One buyer received a lens with a broken focus ring; customer service handled exchange.
  10. Q4 202087/1004.7★9 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sharp image quality, good value, and lightweight design, though some noted slow autofocus.

    • Sharp, crisp image quality exceeded expectations for the price.
    • Great value for money; many called it a must-have for Sony cameras.
    • Autofocus works well but is slower than expected in some reviews.
    • Lens is lightweight and well-made, suitable for portraits and food photography.
  11. Q3 202096/1004.9★8 レビュー

    Buyers praised this lens as affordable, lightweight, and excellent for portraits with great bokeh and sharpness.

    • Great value for money with solid build and crisp image quality.
    • Lightweight and compact design, easy to carry and handle.
    • Excellent bokeh and low light performance for creative portraits.
    • Some prefer a 35mm over this lens for general use.
  12. Q1 202084/1004.4★5 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, video OSS, and fast autofocus, but some noted a disappointing software bundle.

    • Image quality and sharpness are excellent.
    • OSS performs well for video; a favorite for videography.
    • Fast autofocus and low F-stop make it great for portraits.
    • Included software package was low-end and disappointing to some.
  13. Q4 201983/1004.6★8 レビュー

    Buyers praised value, image quality, and compact design. A few noted slower autofocus, noise, and red dots in some photos.

    • Good value for money; budget-friendly lens with decent sharpness and contrast.
    • Autofocus is adequate but noisy, with occasional overshooting on some bodies.
    • Some users observed red dot reflections not seen with kit lens.
    • Lightweight, included hood, and solid overall build for the price.
  14. Q3 201973/1004.3★15 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for sharpness, bokeh, and value, but many noted slow autofocus, especially in low light.

    • Sharp image quality and pleasing bokeh effects are consistently praised.
    • Autofocus is slow and noisy, particularly in dim conditions, disappointing users.
    • Excellent value for money; considered an affordable prime lens for beginners and hobbyists.
    • Some mention firmware update improves AF speed, but it remains a drawback for others.
  15. Q2 201973/1004.3★16 レビュー

    Buyers praise the lens for sharp optics and value, but widely criticize slow, erratic autofocus and noise. A minority report confusion over focal length on APS-C bodies.

    • Autofocus is slow, hunts, and is unreliable, especially in low light
    • Excellent optical sharpness, color, bokeh, and build quality for the price
    • Great value budget prime, but AF performance is a major compromise
    • AF motor is loud/noisy during operation
  16. Q1 201990/1004.8★13 レビュー

    Buyers praised its sharpness, bokeh, and value for portraits on APS-C cameras, but noted occasional autofocus issues and noise.

    • Excellent sharpness, bokeh, and image quality for portraits, often exceeding expectations for the price.
    • Great value and build quality, especially for beginners upgrading from kit lenses on Sony a6000 series.
    • Autofocus can be fast and responsive but sometimes hunts or focuses on wrong subjects, with noticeable noise.
    • Lens size considered large for a 50mm; price slightly higher than comparable Canon 50mm lens.
  17. Q4 201890/1004.7★6 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for fast autofocus, low light performance, and compact size, with one noting OSS incompatibility with Sony FS5.

    • Fast autofocus speed and overall image quality praised.
    • Excellent low light and background blur performance highlighted.
    • Lightweight and portable for travel and street photography.
    • OSS not compatible with Sony FS5, awaiting firmware fix.
  18. Q3 201885/1004.7★6 レビュー

    Most buyers in this period love the lens for its sharpness, bokeh, and value, though one noted slow auto focus.

    • Great value for money and quality glass for portraits and low light.
    • Sharp images and creamy bokeh with wide f/1.8 aperture.
    • OSS is a plus for stabilization on Sony cameras.
    • Auto focus a little slow, but overall positive experience.
  19. Q1 2018100/1005.0★7 レビュー

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, bokeh, value, and macro capability, calling it a versatile upgrade for portraits and indoor use.

    • Very sharp, especially at F4, with superb bokeh and color.
    • Excellent value for the price, often called a bargain.
    • Works well as a macro lens with manual focus at close distances.
    • Great for indoor portraits and video bokeh effect.
  20. Q3 201783/1004.9★7 レビュー

    Buyers praise this lens for portraits, sharpness, bokeh, and low-light performance on Sony APS-C bodies. A few note sharpness isn't perfect wide open and criticize Sony's limited lens selection.

    • Great for portraits with pleasing bokeh and sharp images.
    • Fast and reliable autofocus even in low light.
    • Excellent value with OSS stabilization, especially on A6000 series.
    • Some find it not super sharp wide open; a few users lament Sony's sparse APS-C lens lineup.
  21. Q2 201791/1004.9★8 レビュー

    Buyers praise this lens for its sharpness, value, and quick autofocus, though some note slow focusing for candid shots.

    • Sharp image quality and great value across multiple reviews.
    • Quick autofocus and smooth manual focus, especially with a6500.
    • Slow to focus for a prime, limiting use in candid/street photography.
    • Well-packaged delivery with bundle extras exceeding expectations.

日付のある顧客レビュー 219 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

Performance

The headline here is the 4-stop Optical SteadyShot stabilization, which puts this lens in the 93rd percentile for stabilization. That's genuinely impressive for a sub-$200 prime. You can hand-hold shots at slower shutter speeds than you'd expect, and on older APS-C bodies without IBIS, this is a real advantage. The 9 elements in 8 groups with 1 aspherical element is a simple optical formula, and it shows in the scores. Optical quality lands at 48th percentile, which is middle of the pack at best.

Autofocus is also just average at 54th percentile. It's not slow, but it's not going to win any speed contests either. The minimum focus distance of 390mm gives you a 0.16x magnification, which puts macro capability at 35th percentile. Don't expect to get close to small subjects. The 7-blade diaphragm produces bokeh that lands at 14th percentile, which is a weak spot. Wide open at f/1.8, the background blur can look busy and a bit harsh compared to other 50mm options.

Performance Percentiles

AF 79.1
Bokeh 92.3
Build 93.6
Macro 32.9
Optical 35.2
Aperture 94.5
Versatility 33.5
ユーザー評価 85.4
Stabilization 92.8

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Prime
Focal Length Min 50
Focal Length Max 50
Elements 7
Groups 6
Aspherical Elements 1

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.8
Min Aperture f/1.8
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 7

Build

Mount Sony E
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.2 kg / 0.4 lbs
Filter Thread 49

AF & Stabilization

AF Type DC motor
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 4

Focus

Min Focus Distance 457
Max Magnification 0.16x

vs Competition

Against the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN, this Sony loses on versatility and optical quality but wins on stabilization and price. The Sigma is a zoom with constant f/2.8, but it costs more and lacks OSS. The Viltrox AF 13mm F1.4 is a completely different beast, an ultra-wide prime that beats this Sony on aperture and optical performance but serves a totally different purpose. The 7Artisans AF35mm F1.8 is closer in spirit, a budget prime with a wider field of view, but it lacks stabilization entirely. The Tamron 28-300mm is a superzoom, so it's not really a fair fight, but it does highlight how specialized this Sony is. If you want one lens for everything, this isn't it. If you want a cheap stabilized portrait prime for APS-C, it's hard to beat at the low end of the price range.

Spec Sony FE SEL50F18F 50mm Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 7Artisans Lite Series AutoFocus 35mm F1.8 Full Frame Nikon NIKKOR 2178
Focal Length 50mm 28-300mm 18-50mm 12-35mm 35mm 16-85mm
Max Aperture f/1.8 f/4 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/3.5
Mount Sony E Sony E Sony E Micro Four Thirds Nikon Z Nikon F
Stabilization true true false true true true
Weather Sealed true true true true false false
Weight (g) 186 590 290 306 426 485
AF Type DC motor VXD linear motor stepping motor Autofocus STM AF-S
Lens Type prime zoom zoom zoom prime zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilityユーザー評価Stabilization
Sony FE SEL50F18F 50mm 79.192.393.632.935.294.533.585.492.8
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 97.78163.885.396.569.497.851.781.3
Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare 85.484.585.491.481.386.378.589.936.1
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 53.884.584.649.985.786.380.685.496.7
7Artisans Lite Series AutoFocus 35mm F1.8 Full Frame Compare 85.496.660.397.261.994.533.545.281.3
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 Compare 53.878.555.464.467.680.294.389.992.8

価格

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. In the US, listings range from $159 to $450 across 20 vendors, which is a $291 spread. That's wild for a lens this old. If you're paying anywhere near the top of that range, stop. The $159 to $200 range is where this lens makes sense. Canadian buyers see a tighter spread of CAD 320 to CAD 400, and European listings hover around EUR 228 to EUR 235. The value proposition only holds up at the low end. At $159, you're getting a stabilized portrait prime with solid build quality. At $450, you're getting ripped off when better options exist for less.

最安 €287 1店舗で1件の価格
Amazon 1件の価格 最安 €287

Price History

€220 €240 €260 €280 €300 7月18日10月22日 €287

詳細情報

Overview

The Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS hits a 56.5 out of 100 in our database, which sounds rough until you see where it wins. Stabilization lands in the 93rd percentile and build quality in the 92nd, both near the top of the charts for this category. That's a weird combo for a budget prime, but it makes sense once you realize this lens is really built for APS-C shooters who want a stabilized portrait-length option without spending a fortune.

On a Sony a6000 or similar body, you're getting a 75mm full-frame equivalent field of view at f/1.8. The 202g weight is genuinely light, and the 49mm filter thread keeps accessory costs down. But the optical score sits at 48th percentile, aperture at 21st, and bokeh at 14th. So you're trading image quality ceiling for stabilization and portability. For travel shooters, that math works. For pixel peepers, it doesn't.

Common Questions

Q: Is this lens good for portraits on an APS-C camera?

Yes, the 50mm focal length gives you a 75mm full-frame equivalent on APS-C, which is a classic portrait length. The f/1.8 aperture helps with subject separation, though the bokeh quality ranks in the 14th percentile, so background blur can look a bit busy compared to higher-end options.

Q: Does the stabilization actually make a difference?

It does. The 4-stop Optical SteadyShot ranks in the 93rd percentile for stabilization in this category. That means you can hand-hold at slower shutter speeds than you could with a non-stabilized lens, which is especially useful on older Sony bodies without in-body stabilization.

Q: How does this compare to the Sony FE 50mm f/1.8?

The E 50mm f/1.8 OSS is designed for APS-C sensors and includes optical stabilization, while the FE 50mm f/1.8 is a full-frame lens without OSS. On an APS-C body, the E version gives you a 75mm equivalent field of view and stabilization, but the FE version can be used on full-frame cameras if you upgrade later. The E version's build quality ranks higher in our database, but neither is a standout for optical performance.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you're shooting on a full-frame Sony body. The E 50mm f/1.8 OSS is designed for APS-C, and while it technically covers full-frame, you'll get vignetting and soft corners. Also skip it if you already have in-body stabilization. The main selling point here is the 4-stop OSS, and if your camera already has IBIS, you're paying for a feature you don't need. Portrait shooters who care about background blur should look elsewhere too. The 14th percentile bokeh ranking means the out-of-focus areas can look harsh and distracting. And if you're paying more than $200, you're overpaying. The $450 listings are absurd when sharper options exist for less.

Verdict

The Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS is a niche lens that nails its niche. For APS-C shooters who want a stabilized portrait prime under $200, it's a solid buy. The 4-stop stabilization and 92nd percentile build quality are the reasons to buy. The 14th percentile bokeh and 48th percentile optical quality are the reasons to think twice. If you're shooting on a body with IBIS, skip this and get something sharper. If you're on an older a6000 or similar, the stabilization alone might justify the purchase. Just don't pay more than $200 for it.

Usage Scores

Macro (55.2)総合 (81.2)Budget (77.7)Street (88)Travel (81.2)Portrait (87.3)Landscape (57.9)Professional (81.1)Video Cinema (86.6)Wildlife Sports (73.5)

類似製品