AMD A Series 7850K 4-core FM2+

★★★★☆ 4.2 (608)

The A10-7850K pairs four 4.0GHz CPU cores with Radeon R7 integrated graphics on the FM2+ socket, delivering 856 GFlops through its H.S.A. architecture. Its unlocked multiplier and Mantle API support enable console-like optimizations for budget builds without a discrete GPU. This APU suits entry-level desktop users who need light gaming and basic productivity from a single, low-cost component.

Cores 4
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
TDP 95 W
Socket FM2+
Integrated Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD A Series 7850K 4-core FM2+ cpu
38 総合スコア
他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

The A10-7850K was a cool APU in 2014, but in our database it scores 37.8 out of 100 with single-thread performance in the bottom third. The Radeon R7 graphics and unlocked multiplier are the only real highlights. Unless you're a retro builder, skip it.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • Unlocked multiplier makes overclocking easy on FM2+ boards 89th
  • Radeon R7 iGPU was genuinely useful for light gaming back in the day 76th
  • HSA and Mantle support were forward-thinking features
  • Boxed cooler included, so no extra purchase needed

短所

  • Single-thread performance is rough by modern standards
  • 95W TDP is high for the performance you get
  • FM2+ socket is a dead platform with no upgrade path
  • Multi-thread score lands in the bottom third of our database

オーナーの声

The Word on the Street

4.2/5 (608 reviews)
👍 Several owners say the integrated Radeon R7 graphics handled everyday tasks and light gaming better than expected for the era.
🤔 A common theme is that you need realistic expectations, it's fine for basic use but not a serious gaming or productivity chip.
👎 Some buyers mention the 95W TDP runs hot and the FM2+ socket leaves no room to upgrade.

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '14: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ4 '14: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ1 '15: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ2 '15: 4.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '15: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ3 '16: 5.0★ · 2 レビューQ4 '16: 5.0★ · 1 レビュー1111121Q2 '14Q4 '14Q1 '15Q2 '15Q3 '15Q3 '16Q4 '16
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数

日付のある顧客レビュー 8 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

Performance

Four cores at 4.0GHz with 8MB of L2 cache sounds okay on paper, but PassMark tells the real story: 3395 multi and 1494 single. That single-thread score is the one that hurts most for everyday responsiveness. The Radeon R7 graphics were the whole point of this chip, and for 720p esports titles from its era, it did the job. But don't expect it to handle anything modern beyond 2D games and video playback. The 95W TDP is also a lot of heat for this little performance, which explains the efficiency score sitting in the bottom third.

Performance Percentiles

AI 28.9
Feature 89.1
Platform 17.9
Efficiency 33.8
Multi Thread 29.9
ユーザー評価 75.6
Affordability 57.1
Single Thread 32.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series A Series
Model 7850K
Class desktop

Cores & Clocks

Cores 4
Base Clock 4000
Boost Clock 4000

Cache

L2 Cache 8

Performance

PassMark Multi 3395
PassMark Single 1494

Platform & Power

Socket FM2+
TDP 95
Unlocked Yes

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics

vs Competition

Stacked against something like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, this AMD chip looks like it's from another planet, because it basically is. The Ultra 7 has modern architecture, vastly better single-thread, and efficiency that embarrasses the 7850K. Even against other old silicon in our database like the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, the AMD holds its own in features but loses on platform longevity. The G.Skill Trident Z Neo isn't even a CPU, so that comparison is a bit of a joke, but it does highlight how scattered this category gets. If you want old-school AMD charm, this is fine. If you want actual performance, look anywhere else.

Spec AMD A Series 7850K Intel Core Ultra 9 285K D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X G.Skill Trident Z Neo MICRO CENTER 265KFPRO890WIFI ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX
Cores 4 24 16 6 - 6
Threads - 24 32 12 - 6
Boost Clock Mhz 4000 5700 4400 4200 - 3600
L3 Cache Mb - 36 22 32 - 6
Tdp W 95 125 165 65 - 125
Socket FM2+ LGA 1851 LGA 2066 AMD Socket AM4 - AM3
Integrated Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics Intel Graphics - - - -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価AffordabilitySingle Thread
AMD A Series 7850K 28.989.117.933.829.975.657.132.6
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.995.99796.290.418.599.9
D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X Compare 88.662.681.473.884.270.617.573
G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare 7287.378.483.471.7020.971.6
MICRO CENTER 265KFPRO890WIFI Compare 81.920.417.960.294.3017.399
ADVB3 Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX Compare 32.274.85433.234.37854.633.9

価格

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. US listings hover around USD 128, while European sellers want anywhere from EUR 215 to EUR 332, a spread of EUR 117 depending on which store you hit. The cheapest EUR listing is the only one worth considering if you're in Europe. At USD 128, you're paying collector prices for a chip that gets smoked by a modern USD 100 CPU with integrated graphics. This is nostalgia money, not performance money.

最安 €215 1店舗で1件の価格
Amazon 1件の価格 最安 €215

Price History

€200 €250 €300 €350 7月20日11月9日 €215

詳細情報

Overview

The AMD A10-7850K is a blast from the past, a 2014-era APU that tried to make integrated graphics actually usable for light gaming. It pairs four Steamroller cores with a Radeon R7 iGPU on the FM2+ socket, and at the time, that was a genuinely interesting combo. Today, it's a budget curiosity for tinkerers and retro builders, not a serious daily driver.

Our database puts its total score at 37.8 out of 100, which sounds rough, and honestly, it is. But the feature score lands in the 89th percentile, mostly because HSA and Mantle support were ahead of their time. The problem is everything else. Multi-thread sits near the bottom third, single-thread is mediocre, and the platform is basically a dead end.

Common Questions

Q: Can the A10-7850K handle modern games?

Not really. The Radeon R7 iGPU was decent for 720p titles from its own era, but anything modern will struggle. You'd need a dedicated GPU, and even then the CPU will bottleneck.

Q: Is this worth buying for a budget build today?

Only if you already have an FM2+ motherboard and can find the chip cheap. At USD 128 or more, a modern budget CPU with integrated graphics will run circles around it.

Q: Does the boxed cooler keep it cool enough?

For stock speeds, yes. But with a 95W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, you'll want a better cooler if you plan to overclock.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need a daily driver for modern work, gaming, or anything that benefits from fast single-thread performance. The FM2+ platform is a dead end, so there's no upgrade path. If you're building a budget PC from scratch, a current entry-level CPU with integrated graphics will be faster, cooler, and cheaper in the long run.

Verdict

Buy this if you're building a retro FM2+ system, you already have a board lying around, or you just want to mess with HSA and Mantle for fun. It's a neat piece of history with an unlocked multiplier and a surprisingly capable iGPU for its time. Everyone else should spend their money on literally any modern budget CPU.

Usage Scores

総合 (37.9)AI/LLM (27)Budget (52.1)ゲーム (38.1)Server (26.1)Efficiency (35)Productivity (37)

類似製品