AMD EPYC 9355P 32-core SP5
The 4nm EPYC 9355P delivers a 96,603 PassMark multi-core score with 32 cores and a massive 256MB L3 cache, making it a single-socket powerhouse for dense compute. Its Zen 5 architecture and 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes provide exceptional throughput for data-heavy workloads without requiring a dual-CPU configuration. This processor is best for virtualization hosts and database servers that need high core density and memory bandwidth in a 280W power envelope.
अभी किसी विक्रेता की मौजूदा कीमत नहीं है
एक नज़र में
The 30-Second Version
The EPYC 9355P is a 32-core server beast with a 99th percentile multi-thread score and 256MB of L3 cache. It's built for heavy parallel workloads, not gaming or casual use. Efficiency is the weak spot, but if you need this many cores, it's a strong pick.
Pros & Cons
खूबियाँ
- 32 cores and 64 threads crush parallel workloads 99th
- 256MB of L3 cache is massive for data-heavy tasks 99th
- PCIe 5.0 support keeps storage and networking fast 97th
- DDR5 with ECC means fewer crashes in production 90th
कमियाँ
- 280W TDP demands serious cooling and power delivery
- No price listed, but expect a hefty bill
- Single-thread performance is good, not great
- Social proof is thin, few verified buyers out there
प्रमाण
Performance
The 9355P posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 96,603, which puts it in the 99th percentile for multi-threaded performance. That's top of the charts, best-in-class territory. Single-thread comes in at 3,747, which is solid but not earth-shattering, landing around the 89th percentile. The 256MB of L3 cache is a huge deal for database work, virtualization, and AI inference. The 280W TDP is no joke though, and efficiency takes a hit as a result. You'll need serious cooling and a board with an SP5 socket.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | EPYC |
| Model | 9355P |
| Codename | Turin |
| Class | server |
| Process | 4 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 32 |
| P-cores | 32 |
| Threads | 64 |
| Base Clock | 3550 |
| Boost Clock | 4400 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 32 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 96603 |
| PassMark Single | 3747 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5 |
| Max Speed | 6000 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | SP5 |
| PCIe | 5 |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 |
| TDP | 280 |
| Max Turbo Power | 300 |
| Unlocked | No |
vs Competition
Against the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the 9355P wins on raw core count and multi-threaded throughput, but the Intel chip is a consumer desktop part with much better single-thread performance and lower power draw. The HPE Xeon P67080-B21 is a closer competitor in the server space, but the EPYC's 256MB of L3 cache gives it an edge for memory-hungry workloads. The other 'competitors' in our list, like the MSI motherboard and Thermal Grizzly paste, aren't really direct rivals, they're just adjacent products. The EPYC 9355P sits in a weird spot: overkill for most desktops, but a strong value for a single-socket server.
| Spec | AMD EPYC 9355P | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | HP Xeon 6526Y | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 32 | 24 | 64 | 16 | 24 | - |
| Threads | 64 | 24 | 128 | 32 | 48 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 4400 | 5700 | 4400 | 3900 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 256 | 37 | 128 | - |
| Tdp W | 280 | 125 | 360 | 195 | 200 | - |
| Socket | SP5 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | LGA 4677 | AMD Socket SP3 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | - | No | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| उत्पाद | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | सामाजिक प्रमाण | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD EPYC 9355P | 98.5 | 77.5 | 96.8 | 90.3 | 98.6 | 14.8 | 1.3 | 88.7 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 96 | 97.2 | 96.4 | 90.3 | 18.3 | 99.9 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.5 | 96.8 | 89.7 | 99.4 | 0 | 0.4 | 85.9 |
| HP Xeon 6526Y Compare | 92.1 | 77.5 | 90.7 | 79.3 | 90 | 0 | 2.7 | 80.6 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 77.5 | 84.4 | 85.2 | 93.9 | 36.3 | 5.3 | 80.5 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 66.7 | 97.1 | 0 | 6.4 | 98.4 |
कीमत
Value & Pricing
Value is tricky here because we don't have a confirmed price in our database. Listings show around $5,004 USD, 6,922 CAD, 4,178 EUR, and 3,901 GBP depending on region. For a 32-core EPYC with this level of multi-threaded performance, that's actually reasonable compared to older EPYC or Xeon parts. But if you don't need 32 cores, you're paying for silicon you'll never use. The efficiency score of 41.6 out of 100 is the weakest area, so factor in higher power bills and cooling costs.
और पढ़ें
Overview
The AMD EPYC 9355P is a 32-core, 64-thread monster built on AMD's 4nm Turin architecture. It's aimed squarely at servers and heavy productivity rigs, not your average gaming PC. With a 4.4GHz boost clock and 256MB of L3 cache, this thing is built to chew through parallel workloads without breaking a sweat.
We don't have a price in our database for this exact listing, but it's a server chip, so expect to pay server money. The specs are serious, and the benchmark numbers back that up. This is a workstation or data center part, not something you toss into a home build for fun.
Common Questions
Q: Does the EPYC 9355P work in a standard desktop motherboard?
No. It uses AMD's SP5 socket, which is only found on server and workstation boards. You'll need a board designed for EPYC 9004 or 9005 series chips.
Q: What kind of cooling does this processor need?
With a 280W TDP and 300W turbo, you need a serious server-grade cooler or liquid cooling solution. A standard desktop air cooler won't cut it.
Q: Is this chip good for AI and machine learning workloads?
Yes, it scores 84.3 out of 100 for AI and LLM tasks. The 32 cores and huge cache help with inference, though you'll still want a dedicated GPU for training large models.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you're building a gaming PC or a general home office machine. The single-thread performance is fine but not worth the cost and power draw. If you need strong single-core speed and lower power consumption, look at consumer chips like the Ryzen 7 or Core Ultra series instead.
Verdict
Buy this if you're building a virtualization host, a database server, or a rendering box that needs 32 cores and tons of cache. It's a productivity and server workhorse with best-in-class multi-threaded performance. If you're a gamer or casual user, this is not your chip. The power draw alone will make your electric bill cry.