Xynsviu GeForce GT 740 2GB
The Kepler-based GT 740 runs at 993MHz boost with 2GB of 128-bit memory, drawing just 60W from the PCIe slot with no external power cable, and its low-profile 180mm design fits compact desktops. Four HDMI 2.0 outputs drive up to four 4K displays at 60Hz, making it a practical choice for multi-screen productivity without the bulk of a full-height card. Best for office workers, traders, or digital signage setups that need reliable multi-monitor output on a tight budget, not for gaming or GPU-heavy tasks.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
Avantages et inconvénients
Points forts
- Strong affordability (92nd percentile) 92nd
- Strong social proof (65th percentile) 65th
Points faibles
- Below average ai (6th percentile)
- Below average vram (9th percentile)
- Below average rt (9th percentile)
- Below average raster (11th percentile)
L'avis des propriétaires
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
- Q4 202571/100
Buyers in this period found the GT730 a capable legacy card for basic tasks, multi-monitor setups, and old PCs. One severe failure caused a system crash and data loss, raising reliability concerns.
- Works well as a basic card for office use, multi-monitor, and legacy systems.
- Easy installation in older PCs and Linux servers; low power and low profile.
- One card caused system shutdowns and required OS reinstall, losing data.
- Not for gaming or heavy workloads; fine for light tasks and retro gaming.
- Q3 2025100/100
Buyers report the card works flawlessly, replacing older cards with Win11 driver issues. Easy install, sturdy HDMI ports, and reliable performance over months. Great value.
- Works flawlessly with Win11, resolving crashes and sleep issues from previous cards.
- Sturdy HDMI ports; no connection issues unlike mini DisplayPort cards.
- Easy installation and reliable performance over several months.
- Great value for the money.
D'après 13 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
Les preuves
Performances
Caractéristiques techniques
Fiche technique complète
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | GeForce GT 740 |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Kepler |
| Class | consumer |
| Process | 28 |
Memory
| VRAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Bus | 128 |
Compute
| Base Clock | 993 |
| Boost Clock | 993 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 1422 |
| GPU Compute | 704 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 60 |
| Recommended PSU | 180 |
| Power Connectors | None |
| Cooler | Passive |
| Fans | 0 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCIe x16 3.0 |
| DisplayPort | 0 |
| HDMI | 4 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 180 |
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Form Factor | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.4 kg / 0.9 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | No |
Face à la concurrence
| Spec | Xynsviu GeForce GT 740 | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | GeForce GT 740 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 2GB | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 993 | 2407 | 2805 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 60 | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 128 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Preuve sociale | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xynsviu GeForce GT 740 | 5.9 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 10.5 | 11.2 | 13.9 | 12 | 38.4 | 65.3 | 91.5 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 99.1 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85.2 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 88.8 | 15.9 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.1 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94 | 88.8 | 21 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 99.1 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.2 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.6 | 98.7 | 78.4 | 17.6 |
Scores par usage
- Global19.8
- AI/LLM7.8
- Budget62.1
- Gaming 4k8.9
- Ray Tracing10.5
- Workstation17.3
- Gaming 1080p15.5
- Gaming 1440p12.5
- Content Creation16.9
Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.
