Samsung 8TB SSD SATA III
The 8TB capacity with QLC NAND and DRAM cache delivers 560 MB/s reads and 530 MB/s writes, making it one of the largest SATA SSDs available. Its 2880 TBW endurance and 1,500,000-hour MTBF offer long-term reliability, while hardware encryption adds security for sensitive files. Best for IT professionals and creators who need massive, dependable storage for archives, media libraries, and backups in a desktop or laptop.
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The 870 QVO is the storage equivalent of a warehouse: huge, not fast, but exactly what you need when you need it. Find it near USD 645 and it's a no-brainer for capacity hounds.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 8TB in a 2.5-inch form factor is a storage monster 98th
- DRAM cache keeps everyday performance feeling responsive 95th
- 2880 TBW endurance is respectable for QLC 85th
- Hardware encryption included 71st
Cons
- SATA III means you're capped at 560 MB/s, period
- Random write performance is mediocre
- QLC NAND slows down under sustained heavy writes
- Price per gigabyte is rough compared to smaller drives
What owners think
The Word on the Street
The proof
Performance
Sequential reads hit 560 MB/s and writes land at 530 MB/s, which is about as good as SATA III gets. Random performance is where the QLC NAND shows its limits, with 98K read IOPS and 88K write IOPS putting it in the middle of the pack. The DRAM cache and MKX controller keep things feeling snappy for everyday tasks, but if you're moving massive files around all day, you'll notice the SATA ceiling. The endurance rating of 2880 TBW is solid for a QLC drive, though not class-leading.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 8000 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 560 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 530 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 98000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 88000 |
Hardware
| NAND | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | Yes |
| Controller | MKX |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 2880 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1500000 |
| Warranty (years) | 3 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
| Hardware Encryption | Yes |
vs Competition
The 870 QVO doesn't really compete with NVMe drives like the Kingston FURY Renegade or WD_BLACK SN850X on speed, those are in a completely different league. But if you need 8TB in a 2.5-inch SATA slot, there's basically nothing else. The Micron T710 and Crucial T500 are faster but top out at lower capacities. For pure capacity in a SATA form factor, the 870 QVO is the only game in town. If speed matters more than capacity, any of those NVMe competitors will embarrass this drive.
| Spec | Samsung 8TB SSD | Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 | Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Crucial T500 | SanDisk Black SN850X WDBB9G0040BNC-WRSN | Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8TB | 4TB | 8TB | 2TB | 4TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Seq Read | 560 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s |
| Nand Type | QLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | SLC |
| Dram Cache | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Endurance | 2880 TBW | 4000 TBW | 4800 TBW | 1200 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2800 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Social Proof | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung 8TB SSD | 38.4 | 44.3 | 84.7 | 98.1 | 70.6 | 95.3 | 3 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare | 99.4 | 99 | 90.9 | 92.6 | 93.5 | 87.1 | 6.5 |
| Western Digital WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 88.9 | 96.3 | 93.9 | 98.1 | 88.1 | 95.3 | 3.7 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 93.9 | 96.9 | 98.8 | 78.6 | 83 | 95.3 | 19.3 |
| SanDisk Black SN850X WDBB9G0040BNC-WRSN Compare | 88.9 | 95.6 | 89.4 | 92.6 | 88.1 | 95.3 | 9.5 |
| Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU Compare | 98.1 | 98.5 | 97.5 | 92.6 | 75.1 | 56.8 | 9.1 |
Price
Value & Pricing
This is where it gets tricky. US prices swing wildly from USD 645 to USD 1,895 across eight listings, which is a massive spread. The best deal we're seeing is around USD 645, and at that price it's a compelling buy for anyone who needs massive capacity in a SATA form factor. At the high end, you're paying a premium for the convenience of 8TB in one drive. If you can find it near the low end, it's worth it. If you're looking at the top of that range, you might want to consider a pair of 4TB drives instead.
Amazon 1 offer From €3,306
We started tracking prices for this product on Nov 12, 2026. The chart appears once we have more data.
Read more
Overview
The Samsung 870 QVO is the answer to a very specific question: how do I get 8TB of SSD storage into a laptop or desktop without selling a kidney? It's a SATA drive, so it won't win any speed races against NVMe, but it's the biggest 2.5-inch QLC drive you can buy and it does exactly what it promises. The headline here is capacity, and on that front it's basically untouchable.
Common Questions
Q: Is the 870 QVO good for gaming?
It's fine for game storage. Load times will be slower than NVMe, but you'll fit a massive library on it. If you want the fastest possible load times, get an NVMe drive instead.
Q: Will this work in my laptop?
If your laptop has a 2.5-inch SATA bay, yes. It's a standard 7mm drive, so it fits most laptops that still have SATA slots. Check your laptop's specs before buying.
Q: Is QLC NAND reliable?
For everyday use, yes. The 2880 TBW endurance rating means you'd have to write over 2.6GB per day for three years to hit the limit. Most people won't come close.
Who Should Skip This
If you're looking for speed, this isn't it. Go get an NVMe drive like the WD_BLACK SN850X or Crucial T500 instead. If you're building a new system with an M.2 slot, don't waste it on SATA. This drive is for people who need maximum capacity in a 2.5-inch form factor, period.
Verdict
Buy it if you need 8TB in a SATA form factor and you find it near the USD 645 mark. It's not fast by modern standards, but it's reliable, capacious, and does exactly what it says on the tin. If you're chasing speed, look elsewhere. If you're chasing storage, this is your drive.
Usage Scores
- Overall73.8
- Budget62.9
- Gaming57.1
- Laptop60
- Console30
- Portable19.6
- Workstation62
