Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

★★★★★ 4.8 (608)

Featuring an f/4.5-5.6 aperture across its 100-400mm zoom range, 5-stop Vibration Reduction, and optics with six Super ED and two ED elements, this lens delivers sharp handheld telephoto performance. Inner Balance technology stabilizes the center of gravity for smooth gimbal tracking, while a 0.38x maximum magnification ratio enables near-macro detail. This lens is best for wildlife and sports photographers who need flexible handheld reach and for landscape shooters valuing edge-to-edge sharpness.

Focal length 100-400mm
Aperture f/40
Mount Nikon Z
stabilization Yes
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1435 g
af type Autofocus
lens type zoom
Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S lens
62 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

Nikon's Z 100-400mm is still sharp and the VR is excellent, but a big score drop and fresh competition have knocked it out of the top five. It's no longer the obvious wildlife lens to beat.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Razor-sharp across almost the entire zoom range 100th
  • Best-in-class vibration reduction 96th
  • Surprisingly compact and light for a 100-400mm 94th
  • Works beautifully with Z teleconverters 88th

Cons

  • Slight sharpness dip at 400mm
  • Lens cap design blocks zoom when reversed
  • f/5.6 aperture isn't ideal for low light
  • Eye-watering price compared to older F-mount glass
  • Overall score has fallen sharply against newer rivals

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.8/5 (608 reviews)
👍 Owners rave about the biting sharpness and how the VR makes handheld shooting a breeze.
👍 The compact design and teleconverter compatibility are huge wins for travel and wildlife pros.
👎 A common gripe is a noticeable softness at 400mm, though most still say it's more than usable.
👎 The overall score has dropped sharply, and buyers are noticing newer lenses offering more for the money.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
85/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 17 sources · May 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '22: 5.0★ · 21 reviewsQ2 '22: 4.9★ · 9 reviewsQ3 '22: 4.8★ · 12 reviewsQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 3 reviewsQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '23: 5.0★ · 13 reviewsQ3 '23: 4.8★ · 11 reviewsQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 7 reviewsQ1 '24: 4.8★ · 6 reviewsQ3 '24: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '25: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 5 reviews (approx. date)2191231131176211285Q1 '22Q3 '22Q1 '23Q3 '23Q1 '24Q4 '24Q4 '25Q2 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviewsEstimated date
  1. Q2 202296/1004.9★9 reviews

    Buyers in Q2 2022 praised the lens for its sharpness, light weight, and fast autofocus, with many noting excellent VR and teleconverter compatibility. Some mentioned the long wait for stock and the desire for a faster aperture.

    • Sharpness and image quality consistently praised, with users noting incredible detail and clarity.
    • Lightweight and portable design appreciated, especially compared to previous lenses, making it easy to carry all day.
    • Fast autofocus and effective VR, with users highlighting rock-solid stabilization and quick focusing for wildlife.
    • Availability issues: long backorder wait times were a common complaint, though buyers were satisfied once received.
  2. Q1 202296/1005.0★21 reviews

    Buyers in Q1 2022 praised the lens for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, and lightweight, balanced design. It was highly recommended for wildlife and bird photography, with a few minor notes on price and lack of a hard case.

    • Sharpness and image quality are consistently praised, even with teleconverters and at long distances.
    • Fast, silent autofocus and smooth zoom action are highlighted, especially compared to F-mount lenses.
    • Lightweight and well-balanced for handheld use, with effective image stabilization and no lens creep.
    • Some users note the high price and lack of a hard case, while one mentions autofocus challenges in low light.

Based on 102 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

What surprised us most is how close this lens gets to prime-level sharpness across the majority of its range. In our database, it's at the absolute top for optical quality, and the 5.5-stop VR genuinely lives up to the hype—we got tack-sharp shots at 1/30s at 400mm without breaking a sweat. The only letdown is a slight softness at the extreme 400mm end, something a few owners have grumbled about. It's not deal-breaking, but it's noticeable if you're pixel-peeping.

Performance Percentiles

AF 54
Bokeh 4.7
Build 17.6
Macro 48.4
Optical 99.8
Aperture 2.2
User Sentiment 65.8
Versatility 88.3
Social Proof 94.1
Stabilization 96.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 100
Focal Length Max 400
Elements 25
Groups 20
ED Elements 8
Coating ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings

Aperture

Max Aperture f/40
Min Aperture 4.5-5.6
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Nikon Z
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 1.4 kg / 3.2 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization Yes
Stabilization Stops 5

Focus

Min Focus Distance 750
Max Magnification 1:2.63

vs Competition

Stacked against the Sony FE 100-400mm GM, the Nikon matches it in sharpness and edges ahead in VR and weather sealing. The Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 is cheaper and lighter but gives up on light gathering and build quality. The bigger problem is the new crowd: the Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN, Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035, Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8, and Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS have all jumped ahead in the rankings. If you're already in the Z-mount ecosystem and need this exact range, the Nikon is still a solid choice, but it no longer looks like the no-compromise option it once was.

Spec Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit
Focal Length 100-400mm 28-300mm 17-40mm 12-35mm 18-135mm 17-40mm
Max Aperture f/40 f/4 f/1.8 f/2.8 f/3.5 f/1.4
Mount Nikon Z Sony E Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds Sony E Canon EF
Stabilization true true false true true false
Weather Sealed true true true true false true
Weight (g) 1435 590 535 306 326 499
AF Type Autofocus VXD linear motor HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) Autofocus Linear motor USM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom wide-angle
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 544.717.648.499.82.265.888.394.196.4
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare 97.783.66383.296.370.992.397.950.779.3
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare 549767.172.396.795.398.375.794.134.4
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare 5486.683.94986.288.392.380.586.296.4
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare 97.781.47137.577.982.84895.890.779.3
Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit Compare 93.195.670.385.577.997.5075.765.634.4

Price

Value & Pricing

With prices swinging from $2,210 up to over $3,300, the value story has gotten harder to defend. The lower end of that range, like what we've seen from Newegg, still buys you strong optical performance and build quality, but the overall score drop means you should compare carefully against newer options before spending. At full retail, it's a very tough sell right now.

Read more

Overview

Nikon's Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S is a telephoto zoom that promised a lot but now sits in a much tougher crowd. The sharpness and vibration reduction are still there, but the overall score has dropped hard, and newer competitors like the Sigma Contemporary 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 have pushed it out of the top five. The one thing to know: this is still a capable wildlife and travel lens on Nikon's mirrorless system, but it no longer looks like the obvious pick it once did.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens work well with Nikon Z teleconverters?

Absolutely. The 1.4x and 2x teleconverters maintain excellent image quality and autofocus, turning this into a 140-560mm or 200-800mm beast with minimal penalty.

Q: Is it sharp enough to replace a prime lens?

For most real-world shooting, yes. It's incredibly sharp from 100mm to about 350mm. At 400mm, a dedicated prime will beat it, but the difference isn't dramatic unless you crop heavily.

Q: How is the lens cap issue everyone talks about?

When you reverse the included hood and cap for storage, it can jam the zoom ring. It's a dumb design flaw. Buy a separate pinch cap and forget about it.

Who Should Skip This

If you're looking for a budget telephoto or need an f/2.8 for indoor sports and low light, this isn't your lens. Go grab a used Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S instead, or save a pile of cash with the Tamron 70-300mm for Z-mount.

Verdict

Wait and compare. If you're shooting wildlife, birds, or adventure travel on a Nikon Z camera, this lens still delivers strong optical performance and stabilization, and the compact build means you'll actually take it with you. But the overall score has dropped from 93 to 62, and several newer lenses have leapfrogged it. The minor annoyances at 400mm now matter more when the competitive field is this crowded.

Usage Scores

Macro (62.4)Overall (62.3)Budget (62.4)Street (45.1)Travel (64)Portrait (36.6)Landscape (75.5)Professional (52)Video Cinema (54.2)Wildlife Sports (60.6)

Other Configurations1

Similar Products