Intel Core i9 13900F 24-core LGA1700

★★★★☆ 4.0 (85)

The 24-core Raptor Lake-S chip with 32 threads and a 5.6GHz boost delivers strong multi-threaded performance, scoring 48246 in PassMark, while its 65W base power keeps efficiency high. It lacks an iGPU, so a discrete graphics card is required, but it supports both DDR5 and DDR4 memory and PCIe 5.0. Best for budget-conscious productivity users who need heavy multi-core work without integrated graphics.

Cores 24
Threads 32
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
L3 Cache 36 MB
TDP 65 W
Socket LGA1700
Integrated Graphics none
Intel Core i9 13900F 24-core LGA1700 cpu
85 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The i9-13900F posts a 48,036 PassMark multi-thread score, putting it in the 93rd percentile of our database, with single-thread performance in the 95th percentile. That's exceptional for a 65W TDP chip. But the included cooler is a known failure point, multiple owners report it dying within a year, so plan on spending extra for a proper aftermarket cooler.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 48,036 PassMark multi-thread score, 93rd percentile 99th
  • 4,396 single-thread score, 95th percentile 95th
  • 24 cores and 32 threads for heavy productivity 93rd
  • 5.6GHz boost clock with 36MB L3 cache 93rd
  • 65W base TDP is efficient for the core count

Cons

  • Included Laminar RH1 cooler fails within a year for multiple buyers
  • Gaming score of 79.1 is the weakest area
  • No integrated graphics, discrete GPU required
  • 219W turbo power draw needs serious cooling
  • Installation hassles with BIOS updates and drive recognition reported

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.0/5 (85 reviews)
👍 Owners consistently report massive FPS gains over older CPUs, with one user seeing 280 FPS in Warzone 2 after upgrading from a Ryzen 3950x.
👎 The stock Laminar RH1 cooler is a recurring complaint, with multiple buyers reporting failures within a year and one describing an annoying ticking noise.
🤔 Temperature reports are split, some users say it runs cool under sustained load while others note it gets hot, likely depending on whether they kept the stock cooler or upgraded.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has cooled since launch
68/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 13 sources · Jun 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '23: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ2 '23: 3.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '23: 4.5★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '25: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '25: 3.5★ · 2 reviews222111112Q1 '23Q2 '23Q3 '23Q4 '23Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews

Based on 13 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

The 13900F is a 24-core monster with 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, 32 threads, and a 5.6GHz boost clock. That hybrid architecture is doing serious work here. The 48,036 multi-thread PassMark score puts it in the 93rd percentile, which translates to "one of the best on the market" for productivity and heavy multitasking. Single-thread at 4,396 is a standout too, landing in the 95th percentile. For creators, the 36MB of L3 cache and 16MB of L2 cache mean fewer trips to system memory, and that shows up in real-world rendering and compile times.

Gaming is where things get interesting. Our scoring puts gaming at 79.1 out of 100, which is the weakest area for this chip. That's not bad by any stretch, but it's not the top of the charts either. One reviewer reported 280 FPS in Warzone 2's benchmark with an RTX 4080 and 7000 MHz DDR5, which is a massive jump from their previous Ryzen 3950x setup. The lack of integrated graphics means you need a discrete GPU, but if you're buying a 24-core i9, you almost certainly have one. The 219W turbo power draw is worth noting, this thing can pull some serious wattage when it's boosting.

Performance Percentiles

AI 91.2
Feature 83.5
Platform 93.4
User Sentiment 12.2
Efficiency 98.9
Multi Thread 92.8
Social Proof 72.7
Single Thread 95.4

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand Intel
Series Core i9
Model 13900F
Codename Raptor Lake-S
Class desktop
Process 10

Cores & Clocks

Cores 24
P-cores 8
E-cores 16
Threads 32
Base Clock 2000
Boost Clock 5600

Cache

L2 Cache 16
L3 Cache 36 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 48036
PassMark Single 4396

Memory

Memory Type DDR5
Max Speed 5600
Channels 2
Max Memory 128
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA1700
PCIe 5
PCIe Lanes 20
TDP 65
Max Turbo Power 219
Unlocked No

Graphics & AI

Integrated Graphics none

vs Competition

Against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, the 13900F wins on raw multi-thread throughput with its 48,036 PassMark score, but the 9800X3D's 3D V-Cache gives it an edge in gaming workloads where cache matters more than core count. The 13900F's gaming score of 79.1 reflects that trade-off. Compared to the HP Xeon Silver 4310, the 13900F absolutely crushes it in single-thread performance, the Xeon is built for server workloads and doesn't come close to that 4,396 single-thread number. The MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi is a motherboard, not a CPU, so it's not a direct comparison, but it's worth noting the 13900F needs an LGA1700 board with a 600 or 700 series chipset, not an AM5 board like that MSI. If you're building new, you're locked into Intel's platform here.

Spec Intel Core i9 13900F AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor G.Skill Trident Z Neo Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: HP Xeon Silver 4310
Cores 24 8 24 6 6 12
Threads 32 16 48 12 12 24
Boost Clock Mhz 5600 5200 4000 4200 4000 3300
L3 Cache Mb 36 96 128 32 8 18
Tdp W 65 120 200 65 15 120
Socket LGA1700 AM5 AMD Socket SP3 AMD Socket AM4 AM4 LGA4189
Integrated Graphics none AMD Radeon Graphics - - AMD Integrated Graphics -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AIFeaturePlatformUser SentimentEfficiencyMulti ThreadSocial ProofSingle Thread
Intel Core i9 13900F 91.283.593.412.298.992.872.795.4
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Compare 91.498.595.292.987.89096.595.7
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare 94.877.184.2084.294.536.480.5
G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare 72.787.378.4083.373.6072.2
Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: Compare 64.254.957.2099.3659.266.6
HP Xeon Silver 4310 Compare 39.320.462.5043.653010.8

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop. In the US, you'll find this chip between USD 500 and USD 675 across two listings, and that USD 175 spread is worth paying attention to. Best Buy has the better deal at the lower end of that range. In Europe, prices range from EUR 450 to EUR 587 across four listings in Germany, Spain, France, and Italy, with the EUR 450 option being the obvious pick. The efficiency score of 98 out of 100 is the real story here. You're getting 93rd percentile multi-thread performance at a 65W base TDP, which means lower power bills and less heat to manage compared to the K-series chips. For the performance you're getting, the lower end of these price ranges is a genuinely good deal.

From €587 1 offer across 1 retailer
Amazon 1 offer From €587

We started tracking prices for this product on Jun 13, 2026. The chart appears once we have more data.

Read more

Overview

The i9-13900F posts a PassMark multi-thread score of 48,036, which lands in the 93rd percentile of our database. That's a serious number for a chip with a 65W base TDP, and it puts this thing in the same conversation as CPUs that cost significantly more. Single-thread performance is even more impressive at 4,396, sitting in the 95th percentile. You're getting near-flagship responsiveness without paying for integrated graphics you probably don't need anyway.

But here's the catch, and it's a big one. The included Laminar RH1 cooler is a liability. Our sentiment analysis across 13 pieces of evidence shows owners love the CPU and hate the cooler. Multiple buyers report the fan dying within a year, and one mentioned an annoying ticking noise. The chip itself runs cool under sustained load according to several reviews, but that's likely with an aftermarket cooler. Plan on budgeting for one.

Common Questions

Q: Do I need a separate graphics card with the i9-13900F?

Yes. The F in 13900F means there's no integrated graphics, so you'll need a discrete GPU. This is actually a cost-saving measure, and if you're buying a 24-core i9, you almost certainly have a dedicated graphics card anyway.

Q: Is the included cooler good enough for this CPU?

No, and this is the biggest complaint from owners. The Laminar RH1 cooler has a documented failure rate within the first year according to multiple reviews. The chip's 219W turbo power draw needs serious cooling, so budget for a decent aftermarket cooler from day one.

Q: How does the 13900F compare to the 13900K for gaming?

The 13900F has a lower base TDP at 65W versus the K-series, which means slightly lower sustained boost clocks under heavy load. Our gaming score for the 13900F is 79.1 out of 100, which is solid but not top-tier. If gaming is your primary use case, the K-series or an AMD X3D chip might be a better fit.

Who Should Skip This

If you're building a gaming-first rig, the 79.1 gaming score should give you pause. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D will likely serve you better in cache-sensitive gaming workloads. And if you're not comfortable swapping out a CPU cooler, skip this one entirely. The included Laminar RH1 has a documented failure rate within a year according to multiple owners, and the 219W turbo power draw means you can't just ignore thermals. Installation hassles with BIOS updates and drive recognition are also a recurring theme, so first-time builders might want something with a smoother out-of-box experience.

Verdict

The i9-13900F is a productivity beast hiding in a 65W TDP package. The 48,036 multi-thread score and 95th percentile single-thread performance make it one of the best values in our database for creators and heavy multitaskers. The efficiency score of 98 out of 100 backs that up. But the included cooler is a genuine problem. Multiple owners report failures within a year, and the ticking noise issue suggests quality control problems. Budget for a decent aftermarket cooler and factor that into your total cost. If you do, you're getting near-flagship performance at a price that undercuts the K-series chips significantly.

Usage Scores

Overall (85.1)AI/LLM (86.2)Budget (93.3)Gaming (78.8)Server (79.9)Efficiency (98)Productivity (92.7)

Similar Products