Kingston A400 240GB SATA III 2.5"
Derzeit kein aktueller Händlerpreis
Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile) 95th
- Strong affordability (85th percentile) 85th
Nachteile
- Below average capacity (10th percentile)
- Below average speed (12th percentile)
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
Was Besitzer sagen
Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat
ExklusivBasierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.
- Q2 2026100/100
Buyers in this period praised the SSD for its speed, reliability, and ease of installation, using it to upgrade old desktops or as external storage. All reviews were positive, with no complaints.
- Speed: multiple reviewers noted significant performance gains, including faster boot times and overall system responsiveness.
- Versatility: used as external drive via USB-C adapter and to replace spinning disks, showing flexibility.
- Reliability: described as reliable and light, with no failures or issues mentioned.
- Value: considered affordable and recommended for anyone seeking an SSD upgrade.
- Q1 202695/100
Buyers report the Kingston A400 960GB SSD dramatically improves system speed and responsiveness, is easy to install, and offers good value. One user notes it has remained reliable after four years of use.
- Noticeable performance boost in boot times, app loading, and overall responsiveness compared to HDDs.
- Easy installation in 2.5" SATA slots, suitable for upgrading older PCs or laptops.
- Good price for the capacity and performance delivered.
- Long-term reliability: one user reports the drive still works like new after four years.
- Q2 202387/100
Buyers in Q2 2023 praised the SSD for reviving old computers, offering great value, and providing reliable performance. One noted it's not the fastest but a big upgrade from HDDs, and another highlighted excellent customer service during installation.
- Revives old Macs, Windows PCs, and Linux servers effectively; multiple successful installations.
- Great price for a basic OS drive, offering significant improvement over traditional hard drives.
- Excellent customer service during a laptop repair, with the product working well so far.
- Performance is not the fastest but still a substantial upgrade from spindle drives.
- Q4 201893/100
Buyers in Q4 2018 praised the SSD's value, speed, and build quality, recommending it for HDD upgrades. One noted the need for a SATA cable and bracket, and another mentioned capacity limits for gamers.
- Great value for the price, with fast boot times and solid build quality from Kingston.
- Capacity is limited for gamers; 120GB fits only 2-3 modern games, but fine for basic upgrades.
- Requires separate purchase of SATA cable and mounting bracket, which may be inconvenient.
Basierend auf 18 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Drive
| Capacity | 240 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 500 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 350 |
Hardware
| NAND | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | No |
| Controller | Marvell 88SS1074 |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 80 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1000000 |
Features
| Hardware Encryption | No |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Kingston A400 | Samsung 9100 PRO | Western Digital Black SN850X | Crucial T500 | SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE | Seagate FireCuda 530R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 240GB | 4TB | 4TB | 2TB | 8TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 500 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s | 7,200 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | true | false |
| Endurance | 80 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 1200 TBW | 4800 TBW | 5050 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | User Sentiment | Endurance | Nutzerresonanz | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingston A400 | 11.8 | 22.3 | 53.7 | 10.4 | 56.6 | 52 | 95 | 85.3 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.1 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.5 | 0 | 85.9 | 99.5 | 5.3 |
| Western Digital Black SN850X Compare | 88.5 | 95.2 | 89 | 92.5 | 94.4 | 88 | 95 | 10.7 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 93.8 | 96.5 | 98.8 | 78.3 | 78.4 | 82.9 | 95 | 19.9 |
| SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T2XHE Compare | 87.1 | 96 | 93.6 | 98.1 | 0 | 88 | 95 | 3.9 |
| Seagate FireCuda 530R Compare | 92.6 | 96.4 | 53.7 | 92.5 | 64.9 | 95.6 | 77.3 | 6.9 |
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
