Sony G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS

★★★★★ 4.7 (686)

Mit seinem 70-300mm-Brennweitenbereich, dem optischen SteadyShot-Bildstabilisator und dem schnellen Autofokus liefert das G-Objektiv scharfe Aufnahmen von Sport- und Tiermotiven selbst bei Telebrennweiten aus der Hand. Die wetterfeste Konstruktion mit Nano-AR-Vergütung und eine 9-Lamellen-Blende sichern kontrastreiche Bilder mit weichem Bokeh auch unter schwierigen Bedingungen. Es überzeugt vor allem preisbewusste Natur- und Reisefotografen, die eine vielseitige Vollformat-Telezoom-Lösung ohne häufigen Objektivwechsel benötigen.

Focal length 70-300mm
Aperture f/29
Mount Sony E
stabilization Ja
Weather Sealed Ja
Weight 854 g
af type Linear Autofocus Motor
lens type zoom
Sony G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS lens
56 Gesamtbewertung
Auch erhältlich in:

Überblick

Vor- und Nachteile

Vorteile

  • Strong optical (95th percentile) 95th
  • Strong versatility (91st percentile) 91st
  • Strong social proof (88th percentile) 88th
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile) 83rd

Nachteile

  • Below average aperture (7th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (9th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)

Was Besitzer sagen

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
72/100Unsere KI-Stimmungsanalysehohe Konfidenz · 125 Quellen · Juni 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '17: 2.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '17: 5.0★ · 6 BewertungenQ3 '17: 4.4★ · 9 BewertungenQ4 '17: 4.5★ · 2 BewertungenQ1 '18: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ2 '18: 4.4★ · 12 BewertungenQ3 '18: 4.8★ · 6 BewertungenQ4 '18: 4.3★ · 7 BewertungenQ1 '19: 4.6★ · 7 BewertungenQ2 '19: 5.0★ · 11 BewertungenQ3 '19: 4.1★ · 8 BewertungenQ4 '19: 1.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '20: 4.7★ · 3 BewertungenQ3 '20: 5.0★ · 5 BewertungenQ4 '20: 4.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '21: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ3 '21: 4.7★ · 3 BewertungenQ4 '21: 4.6★ · 5 BewertungenQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '23: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 6 Bewertungen (ca. Datum)169211267711813511351112112126Q1 '17Q4 '17Q3 '18Q2 '19Q1 '20Q1 '21Q1 '22Q2 '23Q2 '24Q2 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der BewertungenGeschätztes Datum
  1. Q4 202188/1004.6★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens for excellent image quality and wildlife photography performance, often recommending a tripod for best results.

    • Users love the lens for wildlife and general photography, highlighting sharpness and zoom range.
    • A tripod is recommended to get the best out of the lens, especially at longer focal lengths.
    • Manual focus mode is noted as particularly impressive for wildlife shots.
    • The lens is considered good value, covering a useful mid-range for various subjects.
  2. Q3 2020100/1005.0★5 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q3 2020 praise the lens for its performance, sharpness, light weight, and reach. They also note solid build quality and competitive price.

    • Excellent performance, especially stability at maximum zoom.
    • Sharp, fast, and light lens suitable for high-resolution sensors.
    • Great weight and value for the price.
    • Impressive reach and detail, with solid build quality.
  3. Q3 201973/1004.1★8 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise image sharpness and versatility for sports/wildlife, but note slower focus, lack of tripod collar, and softness at 300mm.

    • Sharp image quality throughout most of the zoom range.
    • Fast but not instant autofocus; good in good light.
    • Missing tripod collar for heavy lens; concerns about mount strain.
    • Dust sealing uncertainty and slight softness at 300mm.
  4. Q2 201995/1005.0★11 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise this lens for sharpness, light weight, fast autofocus, and budget-friendly value, with one user reporting initial fitting issue resolved by replacement.

    • Sharpness and image quality excellent even at 300mm.
    • Light and compact for hiking and travel use.
    • Great value compared to pricier 100-400 GM lens.
    • One reviewer had initial fit issue on A7 III requiring lens replacement.
  5. Q1 201976/1004.6★7 Bewertungen

    Buyers praised the lens as sharp, portable, and good value, but one noted disappointment in clarity and another wished for a wider aperture.

    • Sharp image quality and solid build (mentioned in 4 reviews).
    • Lightweight and portable for travel (2 reviews).
    • Some found clarity excellent; one user on a6500 was disappointed.
    • Lacks wider aperture, limiting low-light performance (1 review).
  6. Q4 201886/1004.3★7 Bewertungen

    Most buyers praise sharpness and image quality, though some report soft focus or ergonomic issues like bulk and focus ring placement.

    • Sharpness and image quality are highly praised, even at 300mm and in low light.
    • Soft focus reported by one buyer, prompting consideration of return.
    • Lens is bulky; one user wishes for tripod mount and finds vertical shooting awkward.
    • Focus ring placement interferes with stability when zooming during action shooting.
  7. Q3 201893/1004.8★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the lens for being lightweight, sharp, and having excellent OSS. Some purchased but haven't used it yet.

    • Lightweight compared to f/2.8 lenses or 100-400mm.
    • Image quality and sharpness are very good.
    • OSS works well, smooths composition at long focal lengths.
    • A few buyers bought recently with limited use; one hasn't used yet.
  8. Q2 201882/1004.4★12 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise the sharpness, reach, and light weight for hiking. One reports poor sharpness and disappointment; others note the reversed hood blocks the zoom ring.

    • Sharpness, contrast, and autofocus are excellent for the price.
    • Image quality is stellar in good light but softens in low light without tripod.
    • One buyer found the lens unsharp and very disappointing.
    • Reversed hood blocks zoom ring at 70mm, hindering quick use.
  9. Q3 201782/1004.4★9 Bewertungen

    Buyers praise sharpness, image quality, and versatility, but note the lack of a tripod collar, occasional focus hunting, and weight on smaller bodies.

    • Excellent sharpness, contrast, and optical quality across zoom range.
    • No tripod mount causes balance issues on some bodies; homemade solution impractical.
    • Lightweight and compact for a 300mm lens; good stabilization for handheld use.
    • Focus occasionally hunts; serial number sticker can peel off.
  10. Q2 2017100/1005.0★6 Bewertungen

    Buyers in Q2 2017 praised the lens for its sharpness, compact size, fast focus, and build quality. All reviews were 5-star, expressing high satisfaction with its performance across various uses.

    • Sharpness and optical performance praised across multiple uses.
    • Compact size and good balance with Sony cameras.
    • Fast, quiet autofocus and useful focus lock button.
    • Overall excellent build quality and great value.

Basierend auf 107 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

AF 54.6
Bokeh 9.4
Build 46.3
Macro 30.1
Optical 94.5
Aperture 7.2
User Sentiment 15.8
Versatility 90.5
Nutzerresonanz 87.8
Stabilization 83.2

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Optics

Type Zoom
Focal Length Min 70
Focal Length Max 300
Elements 16
Groups 13
Aspherical Elements 4
ED Elements 2
Coating Nano AR Coating

Aperture

Max Aperture f/29
Min Aperture 4.5-5.6
Constant No
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Sony E
Format full-frame
Weather Sealed Yes
Weight 0.9 kg / 1.9 lbs
Filter Thread 72

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Linear Autofocus Motor
Stabilization Yes

Focus

Min Focus Distance 900
Max Magnification 0.31x

Im Vergleich

Spec Sony G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 VXD G2 Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Focal Length 70-300mm 17-28mm 28-75mm 10-18mm 12-60mm 28-70mm
Max Aperture f/29 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/2.8 f/22
Mount Sony E Nikon Z Sony E Sony E Micro Four Thirds Canon RF
Stabilization true false false false true true
Weather Sealed true true true true true true
Weight (g) 854 450 540 260 320 495
AF Type Linear Autofocus Motor Stepping Motor VXD Autofocus linear motor STM
Lens Type zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom zoom
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AFBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureUser SentimentVersatilityNutzerresonanzStabilization
Sony G 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS 54.69.446.330.194.57.215.890.587.883.2
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Compare 8788.273.686.38785.990.868.164.338
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 VXD G2 Compare 54.688.267.387.387.885.980.478.28338
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN Compare 54.683.687.493.381.685.980.469.168.638
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12060 Compare 9888.283.250.490.285.944.293.163.383.2
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare 872670.280.48522.698.177.287.898.5

Preis

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Ab 1.199 € 1 Angebot bei 1 Händler
Amazon.fr 1 Angebot Ab 1.199 €

Wir verfolgen die Preise für dieses Produkt seit dem 25. Mai 2026. Das Diagramm erscheint, sobald mehr Daten vorliegen.

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Macro (52.4)Gesamt (56.2)Budget (68.8)Street (50.1)Travel (68.4)Portrait (39.3)Landscape (76.7)Professional (57.2)Video Cinema (50.3)Wildlife Sports (68.2)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte