Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon
78 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Canon
66
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
63
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
77
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
72
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
83
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
72
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
64
Nikon
83
Travel
Canon
82
Nikon
75
Wildlife Sports
Canon
65
Nikon
78

Spezifikationen

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ISNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements13
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/2.8
Min Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades69
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.10 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicro MotorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance135 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Besser bei:

Travel

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

BudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports