Intel BX80571E6500
The 2.93 GHz Wolfdale dual-core chip with a 65W TDP and LGA 775 socket is a straightforward drop-in upgrade for older desktop boards. It pairs with DDR4 memory up to 64GB and includes HD Graphics 530, though the PassMark score of 1138 multi and 1206 single reflects its age. Best for budget builders or tinkerers reviving an old LGA 775 system for light office work or basic web browsing, not for modern gaming or heavy multitasking.
لمحة سريعة
The 30-Second Version
The E6500 scores 1138 PassMark multi-thread, which is bottom quarter, but it costs as little as USD 34 and carries a 4.6/5 rating from 130 reviews. It's a drop-in LGA 775 upgrade with VT support that owners genuinely like for basic multitasking and Windows 7 XP Mode. Just don't pay more than USD 50 for it.
Pros & Cons
الإيجابيات
- Virtualization Technology support, a real upgrade over the E7200 92nd
- 4.6/5 rating from 130 reviews 84th
- 65W TDP keeps old motherboards happy 70th
- Overclocking headroom mentioned by multiple owners
- USD 34 entry price is hard to beat
السلبيات
- 1138 PassMark multi-thread is bottom quarter
- 1206 single-thread still lags behind most modern chips
- DDR2 memory costs can exceed the CPU price
- Price spread of USD 66 across vendors means you can overpay
- Server score of 29.7/100 is a weak spot
آراء المالكين
The Word on the Street
الأدلة
Performance
Let's be real about the numbers. The E6500 runs at 2.93 GHz with a 1066 MHz FSB, 2MB of L2 cache, and a 65W TDP. PassMark puts it at 1138 multi-thread and 1206 single-thread. That's bottom-tier by modern standards, but the single-thread score actually beats the multi-thread score, which tells you this chip is better at snappy everyday tasks than heavy parallel workloads. The 6MB of L3 cache listed in the specs is a bit odd for a Wolfdale chip, but the 2MB L2 is the real story here.
Overclocking headroom is a recurring theme in user reviews. Multiple owners mention pushing this thing past its stock clocks without drama. The 65W TDP means it won't cook your motherboard either. And Virtualization Technology support is the sleeper feature. Several buyers specifically replaced E7200 chips because the E6500 has VT support and the E7200 doesn't. That matters for Windows 7 XP Mode and any VM work.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Pentium |
| Model | E6500 |
| Codename | Wolfdale |
| Class | desktop |
| Process | 45 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 2 |
| P-cores | 4 |
| Threads | 4 |
| Base Clock | 2930 |
| Boost Clock | 3600 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 2 |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 1138 |
| PassMark Single | 1206 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 2133 |
| Max Memory | 64 |
| ECC | No |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 775 |
| PCIe | 3 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 |
| TDP | 65 |
| Unlocked | No |
Graphics & AI
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
vs Competition
Against the Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2, the E6500 gets absolutely demolished in raw performance. The Xeon is a server-class chip with far more cores and cache. But it also costs significantly more and won't drop into an LGA 775 board. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is in a completely different universe, roughly 15x the PassMark multi-thread score, but you're building a new system around it. The Phenom II X6 HDT90ZFBGRBOX is closer in era but still a six-core chip that beats the E6500 in multi-threaded work. Where the E6500 wins is simplicity: it's a drop-in replacement for ancient Intel systems, and nothing else on this list does that for under USD 50.
| Spec | Intel BX80571E6500 | AMD Ryzen 5 9600X | D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X | Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 | PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr | be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 6 | 16 | 32 | - | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 | 32 | 64 | - | 4 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3600 | 5400 | 4400 | 3500 | - | 3400 |
| L3 Cache Mb | 6 | 32 | 22 | 256 | - | 8 |
| Tdp W | 65 | 65 | 165 | 200 | - | 270 |
| Socket | LGA 775 | AM5 | LGA 2066 | Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) | - | AM4 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon Graphics | - | No | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| المنتج | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | التقييم الاجتماعي | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel BX80571E6500 | 39.9 | 70.1 | 54.2 | 25.1 | 20.3 | 84.3 | 91.5 | 24.1 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 9600X Compare | 84.8 | 93.5 | 95.2 | 95.2 | 84.8 | 96.4 | 58.6 | 96.2 |
| D&H Core i9 BX80673I99960X Compare | 89.1 | 63 | 81.7 | 75.1 | 84.5 | 70.7 | 17.5 | 73.8 |
| Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare | 97.8 | 90.9 | 76.9 | 31.4 | 47.6 | 0 | 87.9 | 51.6 |
| PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr Compare | 50.2 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 29.2 | 68 | 0 | 86.9 | 44.9 |
| be quiet! Ryzen 3 Dark Rock Pro 5 Compare | 44.9 | 63 | 61.3 | 26.7 | 46.6 | 90.3 | 76.1 | 50.9 |
السعر
Value & Pricing
Here's where it gets interesting. The E6500 lists between USD 34 and USD 100 across US vendors, a spread of USD 66. That's a massive gap for the same chip. The EUR market is even wilder, ranging from EUR 58 to EUR 183 across four listings. If you're paying the high end of either range, you're getting fleeced. At USD 34, this is a no-brainer for reviving an old LGA 775 system. At USD 100, you're approaching used Ryzen 3 territory and should walk away. The affordability percentile sits at 91, which confirms this is one of the cheapest ways to get a functional dual-core upgrade. Just shop around before you commit.
Amazon عرض واحد ابتداءً من 76 €
Price History
اقرأ المزيد
Overview
The Intel Pentium E6500 scores 1138 in PassMark multi-thread and 1206 single-thread. That puts it in the bottom quarter for both, but here's the thing: this chip costs between USD 34 and USD 100 depending on where you look. For a drop-in LGA 775 upgrade, that's a different conversation entirely. We're not comparing this to a Ryzen 5 5500. We're comparing it to whatever ancient Celeron or Pentium 4 is currently wheezing inside an old Dell Optiplex.
Users give it a 4.6 out of 5 across 130 reviews, and the sentiment score sits at 88/100. People aren't buying this for gaming or rendering. They're buying it to keep an old machine alive for basic multitasking, Windows 7 XP Mode, and light productivity. And for that job, it delivers.
Common Questions
Q: Will this work in my LGA 775 motherboard?
Yes, the E6500 is designed for LGA 775 (Socket T). It runs at 2.93 GHz with a 1066 MHz FSB and a 65W TDP, so most LGA 775 boards with BIOS support for Wolfdale chips should handle it. Check your motherboard's CPU support list to be sure.
Q: Is this a good upgrade from an E7200?
It's a meaningful upgrade if you need Virtualization Technology. The E7200 lacks VT support, while the E6500 has it, which matters for Windows 7 XP Mode and VM workloads. The clock speed bump from the E7200's 2.53 GHz to 2.93 GHz is also a nice bonus.
Q: How does it handle modern workloads?
It doesn't, really. The 1138 PassMark multi-thread score puts it in the bottom quarter of all CPUs we track. It's fine for web browsing, email, office apps, and light multitasking, but anything involving rendering, gaming, or heavy parallel work will struggle.
Who Should Skip This
If you're building a new system or expecting to run anything beyond basic productivity, skip this. The 1138 PassMark multi-thread score is bottom quarter, and the server score of 29.7/100 is a real letdown. You'd be better off saving for a used Ryzen 3 or even a newer Pentium Gold. Also skip it if you don't already have DDR2 memory lying around, because buying DDR2 in 2024 can cost more than the chip itself. And if you see it listed above USD 50, walk away. The value proposition falls apart fast at the high end of that USD 34 to USD 100 range.
Verdict
The E6500 is a niche product with a clear job: keep an LGA 775 system alive for basic tasks. The 4.6/5 user rating and 88/100 sentiment score tell you that people who buy it for that purpose are happy. The PassMark scores tell you it won't do anything demanding. If you've got an old Dell or HP with a dead or weak CPU and you just need email, web browsing, and maybe some light VM work, this chip at USD 34 is a solid buy. At USD 100, it's a mistake. The data is clear: this is a value play, not a performance play.