促销 10%

Audio-Technica ATH-M70X

★★★☆☆ 3.0 (24)

Its proprietary 45mm drivers deliver a flat 5Hz-40kHz frequency response for precise studio monitoring. The fold-flat design and detachable, durable ear pads add genuine portability and long-wear comfort for critical listening sessions. These headphones are best for audio engineers and mixers who need an uncolored reference to dissect dense, multi-layered tracks.

form factor over-ear
driver type dynamic
driver size mm 45
impedance ohms 35
open closed back closed
Audio-Technica ATH-M70X headphones
47 综合评分
其他可用国家/地区:

概览

The 30-Second Version

The Audio-Technica ATH-M70x brings a 90th-percentile sound performance, offering shockingly detailed audio that's a genuine asset for any mixing engineer. You just have to accept the deal-breakingly fragile build that dominates owner complaints, turning what should be a flagship into a delicate lab instrument. If your priority is hearing every last click and breath in a recording, it delivers; for anything else, including basic durability, it's a gamble.

Pros & Cons

优点

  • Sound quality lands in the 90th percentile, making it a top-tier analytical tool. 90th
  • The 5Hz-40kHz frequency range pulls out microscopic details most headphones miss. 81st
  • Lightweight 280g build and fold-flat design add real portability for studio work.
  • Rotating earcups make one-ear monitoring effortless during tracking sessions.

缺点

  • Build quality is a known weak point, with swivel joints prone to cracking.
  • Mic quality ranks at a dismal 21st percentile, so don't even think about calls.
  • The neutral tuning means no fun bass bump, which can sound harsh with bright material.
  • Despite a pro 'monitor' label, the 34th percentile ANC score offers almost no isolation from the outside world.

用户评价

The Word on the Street

3.0/5 (24 reviews)
👎 A flood of owners report the plastic swivel joints snapping after even minor drops, calling the build quality inexcusable for the price.
👍 Many users rave about the revealing and neutral sound signature, noting it exposes fine details that other headphones completely miss.
🤔 While some find them comfortable for long mixing sessions, others strongly criticize the ear pads for becoming uncomfortable and hot over time.

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

用户口碑随时间不断改善
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '15: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '16: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q3 '18: 1.5★ · 2 条评价Q4 '18: 3.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '19: 2.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '21: 2.5★ · 2 条评价Q3 '21: 3.1★ · 5 条评价Q4 '21: 2.0★ · 1 条评价Q1 '24: 2.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '24: 2.0★ · 2 条评价Q2 '25: 3.3★ · 3 条评价Q4 '25: 3.0★ · 2 条评价1121125112321Q4 '15Q2 '16Q3 '18Q4 '18Q2 '19Q2 '21Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '24Q4 '24Q2 '25Q4 '25Q2 '26
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量估计日期
  1. Q2 202533/1003.3★3 条评价

    Buyers praise the sound quality but report that the headphones break easily, even with careful handling.

    • Excellent sound quality, responsive with little distortion.
    • Headphones break easily at the cup, even with careful use.
    • Durability is poor; some users accept it as a trade-off for sound.
    • Cannot handle even slight drops; failure is a matter of time.
  2. Q3 202148/1003.0★5 条评价

    Buyers praised clear sound and value but criticized fragile joints and limited rotation, recommending them only for mixing and mastering.

    • Clear, detailed sound with nearly flat response; good value for the price.
    • Fragile joints and lack of 180-degree cup rotation; easily broken if not careful.
    • Great for mixing and mastering, but not recommended for casual listening or movies.
    • Highs may sound overwhelming on first listening for some users.

基于 23 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

实测数据

Performance

Let's talk about what these do best: detail. The 45mm large-aperture drivers with rare earth magnets dig out reverb tails, subtle compression artifacts, and mouth noises that more forgiving headphones gloss right over. In our database, a 90th percentile sound score means you're getting a ruler-flat reference that's perfect for mastering, audio forensics, or just picking apart your favorite album. The 35Ω impedance is easy enough to drive from a phone, but like many owners point out, these really sing with a clean DAC and amp setup, opening up the crazy 5Hz to 40kHz range.

Performance Percentiles

Anc 33.6
Mic 20.6
Build 81.4
Sound 89.7
Battery 52.6
Comfort 62.2
Connectivity 51.3
用户口碑 24.5

Specifications

Full Specifications

Design

Form Factor over-ear
Open/Closed closed
Foldable Yes
Weight 0.3 kg / 0.6 lbs

Audio

Driver Type dynamic
Driver Size 45
Freq Min 5
Freq Max 40000
Impedance 35
Sensitivity 97
Hi-Res Audio No

Noise Control

ANC No
Transparency No

Connectivity

Wireless No
Multipoint No
Wired Connector 3.5mm
Detachable Cable Yes

Microphone

Microphone No
NC Mic No
Boom Mic No
Detachable Mic No

Features

Touch Controls No
Gaming Mode No

vs Competition

Stacked against the competition, the M70x is a specialist, not an all-rounder. The sony-ult-wear-whult900n-b and bose-quietcomfort-ultra-quietcomfort-ultra will absolutely demolish it in comfort, ANC, and fun factor for everyday listening, while the apple-airpods-max-midnight offers a premium build and seamless ecosystem integration that makes the Audio-Technica's creaky plastic feel like a prototype. Even among studio monitors, the Sennheiser HDB 630 offers a more durable design and a more natural timbre for longer sessions. You're buying the M70x for its brutally honest frequency response, nothing else.

Spec Audio-Technica ATH-M70X Sennheiser HDB 630 Sony ULT WEAR WHULT900N/B Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 Apple AirPods Max Midnight Technics EAH-A800
Form Factor over-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear over-ear
Driver Type dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic dynamic
Driver Size (mm) 45 42 40 40 40 40
Impedance Ohms 35 480 314 - 16 34
Wireless false true true true true true
Active Noise Cancellation false true true true true true
Open Closed Back closed closed closed closed closed closed
Bluetooth Version - 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.0 5.2
Battery Life Hours - 60 30 30 20 50
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
产品 AncMicBuildSoundBatteryComfortConnectivity用户口碑
Audio-Technica ATH-M70X 33.620.681.489.752.662.251.324.5
Sennheiser HDB 630 Compare 98.589.481.498.893.155.795.689.6
Sony ULT WEAR WHULT900N/B Compare 98.589.481.496.982.162.299.289.6
Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 Compare 98.599.596.399.582.162.298.398.7
Apple AirPods Max Midnight Compare 98.587.993.895.177.534.99698.7
Technics EAH-A800 Compare 95.298.881.49889.562.298.166

价格

Value & Pricing

Pricing for these is all over the map, with a spread of over $5000 across different vendors, which is frankly absurd for a headphone that launched in the mid-$200s. If you can find a pair near the lower end, around that $249 mark, the sheer analytical power of the 45mm drivers is a solid deal for mixing engineers who need a second reference. Pay a dime over $300, and you should seriously look at competitors that don't carry the same structural baggage.

最低 €278 1 家零售商共 1 个报价
Amazon.es 1 个报价 最低 €278

Price History

€277 €277 €278 €278 €279 5月30日7月20日 €278

了解更多

Overview

The Audio-Technica ATH-M70x lands in the 90th percentile for sound in our database, which puts it among the best for pure audio analysis. You're getting a set of 45mm drivers that reach from 5Hz up to 40kHz, and in practice, that translates to a hyper-detailed, neutral profile that will expose every flaw in a mix. But here's the thing: that stellar sound comes wrapped in a build quality story that's frankly a mess, sinking to the 25th percentile for social proof largely because of it.

Common Questions

Q: Are these good for just casual music listening?

Probably not. The 90th percentile sound score might sound great on paper, but in practice, this is a ruthlessly analytical tuning. It's measured flat to expose flaws, so if a song has a harsh hi-hat or a sibilant vocal, you will hear every last bit of it. You'll get much more enjoyable listening out of something with a less forensic frequency response.

Q: How durable is the build, really?

The data isn't pretty. Build quality sits in only the 82nd percentile overall, but that number masks a specific, well-documented problem: the plastic swivel hinges. They are a major failure point, and with a social proof score down at the 25th percentile, it's clear this isn't a one-off complaint. Treat these like a delicate piece of test equipment, not a pair of throw-around monitor headphones.

Q: What is the warranty or replacement parts situation?

While Audio-Technica provides a standard warranty, the real-world feedback is a major pain point. Owners constantly report that replacement parts, especially for those fragile swivel joints and ear pads, are notoriously hard to find. If the plastic breaks outside of warranty, the lack of availability turns these headphones into an expensive paperweight.

Who Should Skip This

Skip these if you need headphones that can survive a backpack or a cluttered desk. With build quality complaints dominating owner feedback and a social proof score wallowing at the 25th percentile, a single drop from your desk is a well-documented risk. DJs, commuters, or anyone who wants a set of cans that feels as premium as it sounds should run toward the sturdier competition.

Verdict

The ATH-M70x serves a hyperspecific master: the mixing engineer who needs a second analytical reference and will treat their gear like fine china. The 90th percentile sound quality is the real deal for forensic audio work, but we can't ignore the widespread build issues that tank its owner satisfaction. Buy them for the detail but know you're getting a fragile tool, not a daily driver.

Usage Scores

Work (34.5)Calls (24.3)Music (59.4)总体 (46.9)Budget (55.9)游戏 (43.2)Studio (69.1)Commute (42.2)

类似产品