Sigma 750975
Combining a 100-400mm reach with a relatively light 1100g build, this lens stands out for full-frame mirrorless portability. Its dust- and splash-proof brass mount and optical design that minimizes flare add rugged, practical reliability. This is best for outdoor enthusiasts and travelers who need handheld telephoto range without the bulk of traditional pro glass.
Geen actuele winkelprijs
Overzicht
The 30-Second Version
A featherweight 100-400mm that's easy to carry but hard to love. The optics are a letdown, and the build quality feels like an afterthought.
Pros & Cons
Pluspunten
- Incredibly light for a 100-400mm zoom 88th
- Versatile focal range for sports, wildlife, and pets 71st
- Optical Stabilizer helps with hand-held shots 70th
- Macro-style close-ups at 1:4.1 magnification
Minpunten
- Optical quality is near the bottom of the barrel
- Build quality is one of the worst we've seen
- No weather sealing despite the dust-proof mount claim
- Stabilization is mediocre at best
De feiten
Performance
The versatility score is the real story here. It lands in the 88th percentile, which means it handles a huge range of shooting situations better than most lenses we've tested. But the optical score is a different story entirely. At the 19th percentile, the sharpness and clarity just aren't there compared to modern glass. The FLD and SLD elements help with aberrations, but the numbers don't lie. This is a lens that trades image quality for convenience.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 100 |
| Focal Length Max | 400 |
Aperture
| Min Aperture | f/5-6.3 |
Build
| Weight | 1.1 kg / 2.4 lbs |
vs Competition
The Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm is the most direct competitor here, offering similar versatility with better build quality. The Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 is a different beast entirely, shorter reach but far superior optics. If you're on a budget, the Sony E 18-135mm gives you decent range without the optical penalty. The Sigma's only real advantage is that 400mm reach in a light package, but you're sacrificing a lot to get it.
| Spec | Sigma 750975 | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD | Nikon NIKKOR 20059 | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 100-400mm | 28-300mm | 18-55mm | 12-35mm | 18-135mm | 28-70mm |
| Max Aperture | - | f/4 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | - | Sony E | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | false | true | false | true |
| Weight (g) | 1100 | 590 | 205 | 306 | 326 | 495 |
| AF Type | - | VXD linear motor | pulse stepping motor | Autofocus | Linear motor | STM |
| Lens Type | - | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Optical | Aperture | Versatility | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sigma 750975 | 53.8 | 69.7 | 3.6 | 12.1 | 17.4 | 70.8 | 88.2 | 34.3 |
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD Compare | 97.7 | 83.4 | 62.9 | 83.2 | 96.3 | 70.8 | 97.9 | 79.3 |
| Nikon NIKKOR 20059 Compare | 84.6 | 81.2 | 83.6 | 95.3 | 54.4 | 82.6 | 82.7 | 92.3 |
| Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-ES12035 Compare | 53.8 | 86.5 | 83.8 | 48.8 | 86.1 | 88.2 | 80.4 | 96.4 |
| Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Compare | 97.7 | 81.2 | 70.9 | 37.3 | 77.9 | 82.6 | 95.8 | 79.3 |
| Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Compare | 84.6 | 86.5 | 70.3 | 41.4 | 83.8 | 88.2 | 76.9 | 98.4 |
Prijs
Value & Pricing
At around $1,049 USD, this lens is asking a lot for what it delivers. The portability is nice, but you're paying premium prices for subpar optics. If you need the reach and can't carry heavy glass, it might be worth it. But for most people, there are better ways to spend a grand.
Lees meer
Overview
The Sigma 750975 is a 100-400mm zoom that punches way above its weight class for portability. At 1100g, it's light enough to hand-hold all day, which is rare for this focal range. But don't let the compact body fool you, this lens has some serious optical compromises baked in.
Common Questions
Q: Is this lens good for wildlife photography?
The 400mm reach is nice, but the soft optics will frustrate you when you're cropping in on distant animals. You'll get the shot, but it won't be sharp enough to print large.
Q: Can I use this lens in the rain?
No. Despite the dust-proof mount, there's no weather sealing on the lens body. Keep it dry or you'll be shopping for a replacement.
Q: Is the stabilization good enough for hand-held shooting?
It helps, but it's not great. The OS system is mediocre compared to modern competitors. You'll still need fast shutter speeds or steady hands.
Who Should Skip This
If you care about image sharpness or build quality, this isn't your lens. Go grab the Tamron 28-300mm instead, you'll get similar versatility without the optical penalty. If you're shooting in rough conditions, look elsewhere entirely.
Verdict
Skip this one unless portability is your absolute top priority and you're willing to accept soft images. The 100-400mm range is tempting, but the optical performance is a dealbreaker for anyone who cares about image quality. There are better lenses out there for the same money.
