신제품

Crucial BX500

★★★★★ 4.5 (1,265)

The 4TB SATA III drive delivers 540 MB/s reads and 500 MB/s writes, making it 300% faster than a typical hard drive while its DRAM-less TLC NAND design keeps costs low. Its 45x energy efficiency extends laptop battery life, and the 1,500,000-hour MTBF rating points to reliable operation without moving parts. Best for budget-conscious desktop or laptop owners upgrading from an HDD who need massive storage for photos, music, and videos without spending on NVMe.

Capacity 4TB
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Read Speed 540 MB/s
NAND TLC
Endurance 1000 TBW
Crucial BX500 ssd
62 종합 점수

현재 판매처 최신 가격 없음

다른 국가에서도 구매 가능:

요약

The 30-Second Version

The Crucial BX500 4TB is a budget 2.5-inch SATA SSD that delivers huge capacity and easy installation for older laptops and desktops. It's not fast by modern NVMe standards, but it's a solid upgrade from any hard drive. If you need 4TB of cheap SATA storage and don't mind the DRAM-less design, this is a strong pick.

Pros & Cons

장점

  • Huge 4TB capacity for the price 93rd
  • Easy drop-in replacement for 2.5-inch HDDs 79th
  • Solid 1000 TBW endurance rating 71st
  • Low power draw helps laptop battery life 66th
  • 3-year warranty from a reputable brand

단점

  • SATA III speed ceiling limits performance
  • DRAM-less design can slow sustained writes
  • No NVMe option for modern systems
  • Warranty support can be frustrating, per some owners
  • Not a good fit for heavy 4K video editing

사용자 의견

The Word on the Street

4.5/5 (1265 reviews)
👍 Buyers consistently praise how easy the BX500 is to install as a direct replacement in older laptops and desktops.
👍 The 4TB capacity is a recurring highlight, with several owners saying they're considering buying another one for additional storage.
🤔 A few owners report good experiences with the drive itself but frustration with Crucial's warranty support when a unit arrived dead.

시간에 따라 사용자 평판이 어떻게 변했는가

독점

고객이 실제로 리뷰를 작성한 시점을 기준으로 합니다. 초기의 호평이 유지되었는지 확인할 수 있습니다.

88/100당사 AI 감성 분석신뢰도 낮음 · 5개 출처 · 2026년 11월

날짜가 있는 고객 리뷰 5건을 기준으로 달력 분기별로 묶었습니다. 기간별 분석은 영어로 제공됩니다.

근거 자료

Performance

The BX500 tops out at 540 MB/s sequential read and 500 MB/s sequential write. That's the practical limit of the SATA III interface, so you're not leaving performance on the table. In our database, this puts the drive in the bottom quarter for speed and random performance compared to all SSDs, but that's an unfair fight when the competition includes PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 5 drives that hit 7,000 MB/s or more. For a SATA drive, these numbers are exactly what you'd expect.

In real-world terms, booting Windows from this drive will feel dramatically faster than a mechanical hard drive. Crucial claims 300% faster boot times compared to a typical HDD, and that tracks with what we've seen from SATA SSDs generally. Game load times will improve too, though not as much as they would on an NVMe drive. The DRAM-less design means sustained writes can dip under heavy load, but for everyday tasks like web browsing, office work, and loading older games, you won't notice a problem. The 1000 TBW endurance rating is solid for a budget drive, and the integrated power loss immunity is a nice touch for a drive in this price range.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 24.9
Random 21.9
Feature 52.9
Capacity 92.6
User Sentiment 79
Endurance 66.4
사용자 평판 70.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 4000
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Protocol SATA
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 540
Sequential Write (MB/s) 500

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 1000
MTBF (hours) 1500000
Warranty (years) 3

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption No

vs Competition

Stacked against the Samsung 990 Pro or Western Digital Black SN850X, the BX500 looks like it's from another decade, because in interface terms, it is. Those NVMe drives are many times faster and aimed at gamers and creators who need every ounce of throughput. But they also cost more per gigabyte and require an M.2 slot, which older systems don't have. The Micron T710 and Seagate FireCuda 530R are in the same boat, they're PCIe Gen 4 drives that will absolutely smoke the BX500 in benchmarks but won't fit in a laptop with only a 2.5-inch bay.

Where the BX500 actually competes is against other SATA SSDs like the Samsung 870 EVO or Crucial's own MX500. The MX500 has DRAM, which gives it better sustained write performance, but it typically costs more. The BX500 trades that DRAM cache for a lower price and still delivers the same SATA speed ceiling for reads. If you're just replacing an old HDD and want maximum capacity for minimum cash, the BX500 is the more sensible pick. If you're running an OS and lots of write-heavy applications, the MX500 or 870 EVO might be worth the premium.

Spec Crucial BX500 Samsung 9100 PRO Western Digital WD Black SN850X Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Seagate FireCuda 530R SanDisk Western Digital WDS400T1X0M
Capacity 4TB 8TB 4TB 2TB 4TB 4TB
Form Factor 2.5" M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface SATA III PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4
Seq Read 540 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 14,900 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache false true true true false true
Endurance 1000 TBW 4800 TBW 2400 TBW 2000 TBW 5050 TBW 2400 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
제품 SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEndurance사용자 평판
Crucial BX500 24.921.952.992.67966.470.6
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 9999.899.798.1085.895.6
Western Digital WD Black SN850X Compare 88.29593.892.694.980.995.6
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare 92.993.793.878.266.793.895.6
Seagate FireCuda 530R Compare 92.596.352.992.664.995.488.5
SanDisk Western Digital WDS400T1X0M Compare 97.599.197.592.6080.90

가격

Value & Pricing

Pricing on the BX500 4TB is all over the place depending on where you shop. In the US, we're seeing listings from USD 479 to USD 649, which is a spread of USD 170 for the exact same drive. The best deal in our data comes from Amazon, where the lower end of that range applies. In Europe, the gap is even wider, with EUR prices ranging from EUR 540 to EUR 803 across German, Spanish, French, and Italian retailers. That's a EUR 263 difference, so it pays to shop around. For a 4TB SATA SSD, the lower end of these ranges is competitive, but at the high end you're creeping into territory where a 4TB NVMe drive starts to look tempting, assuming your system can use one.

2026년 11월 8일부터 이 제품의 가격을 추적하고 있습니다. 데이터가 쌓이면 차트가 표시됩니다.

더 보기

Overview

The Crucial BX500 4TB is a 2.5-inch SATA III internal SSD aimed at people who need a lot of storage without spending NVMe money. It's a budget-friendly way to replace a spinning hard drive in an older laptop or desktop, and it sits in a crowded field of SATA drives that all promise the same basic thing: make your old machine feel less old. With 4TB of TLC NAND and a DRAM-less design, this drive is all about capacity per dollar, not raw speed.

If you're searching for a 4TB SSD for a laptop or desktop, the BX500 is one of the cheapest ways to get there. It's rated for 540 MB/s read and 500 MB/s write, which is about as fast as the SATA III interface allows. That's nowhere near what a modern NVMe drive can do, but if your system only has SATA ports, this is the ceiling. The drive also carries a 3-year warranty and a 1,500,000 hour MTBF rating, which is standard fare for this class.

We see a lot of drives in our database, and the BX500 lands in an interesting spot. Its capacity is top-tier for a 2.5-inch SATA drive, but its speed scores are near the bottom of the barrel compared to all SSDs, including NVMe models. That's not a knock on Crucial specifically, it's just the reality of SATA in a PCIe world. For the right use case, though, this drive makes a lot of sense.

Common Questions

Q: Is the Crucial BX500 4TB good for gaming?

It's fine for storing and loading games, especially older titles or anything that doesn't rely on super fast load times. Just don't expect NVMe-level performance, since SATA III caps out around 540 MB/s.

Q: Does the Crucial BX500 work in a laptop?

Yes, as long as your laptop has a 2.5-inch SATA bay. It's a drop-in replacement for older mechanical hard drives and uses very little power, which can help battery life.

Q: Is the Crucial BX500 better than the MX500?

The MX500 has a DRAM cache, which gives it better sustained write performance under heavy loads. The BX500 is cheaper and still hits the same SATA speed ceiling for reads, so it comes down to whether you need that extra write consistency.

Q: How long will the Crucial BX500 4TB last?

It's rated for 1000 TBW, which means you could write 1000 terabytes to the drive before the warranty endurance rating is exceeded. For typical home use, that's many years of service.

Who Should Skip This

Skip the BX500 if your system has an M.2 slot and you care about speed. Anyone doing 4K video editing, large database work, or frequent multi-gigabyte file transfers will feel the lack of DRAM and the SATA bottleneck. Gamers with modern motherboards should look at NVMe drives like the Samsung 990 Pro or WD Black SN850X instead. And if you're building a new PC from scratch, there's almost no reason to choose SATA for your primary drive in 2025. This drive is for upgrading old machines, not building new ones.

Verdict

Should you buy the Crucial BX500 4TB? If you have an older laptop or desktop with a 2.5-inch SATA bay and you want to breathe new life into it without spending a fortune, yes. This drive is a straightforward, reliable way to get 4TB of solid state storage into a machine that can't take advantage of NVMe speeds anyway. The easy installation and huge capacity are exactly what most people upgrading from a hard drive are looking for.

But if you have an M.2 slot available, or if you do heavy video editing, large file transfers, or anything that benefits from high sustained write speeds, skip this and get an NVMe drive. The BX500 is a budget SATA SSD, and it's honest about that. For the right machine and the right workload, it's a great value. For everything else, it's a bottleneck.

Usage Scores

종합 (62)Budget (80.2)게이밍 (46.9)Laptop (58.3)Console (24.5)Portable (16.4)Workstation (52.1)

다른 구성6

유사 제품