AMD EPYC 7763 64-core LGA 4094

★★★★★ 4.8 (8)

The 64-core, 128-thread EPYC Milan chip with a 3.5GHz boost clock and 256MB L3 cache delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, scoring 84492 in PassMark. Its PCIe 4.0 support and DDR4 ECC memory make it a solid choice for heavy server workloads, though its 280W TDP limits efficiency. Best for data center operators running virtualization, database, or AI inference tasks that need maximum core count over power savings.

Cores 64
Threads 128
Boost Clock 3500 MHz
L3 Cache 256 MB
TDP 280 W
Socket LGA 4094
AMD EPYC 7763 64-core LGA 4094 cpu
80 総合スコア

現在、販売店の最新価格はありません

他の国でも利用可能:

概要

The 30-Second Version

The EPYC 7763 is a 64-core server monster with top-tier multi-core and AI performance. Single-thread is average and efficiency is rough at 280W. Worth it if you need massive parallel throughput and can find a good deal, especially in the EUR 1,519 range.

Pros & Cons

長所

  • 64 cores and 128 threads crush multi-threaded workloads 98th
  • 256MB of L3 cache keeps data close to the cores 98th
  • Top-tier AI and multi-core performance in our database 86th
  • ECC DDR4 support for serious stability 84th

短所

  • 280W TDP means serious cooling and power bills
  • Single-thread performance is just okay
  • Efficiency score is the weakest area at 40.9
  • PCIe 4.0 only, no Gen 5 support

オーナーの声

The Word on the Street

4.8/5 (8 reviews)
👍 Several buyers mention purchasing multiple units over time without any issues, which speaks to reliability.
🤔 A few owners note the platform requirements and power draw make it a commitment, not a casual upgrade.

購入者の評価が時間とともにどう変化したか

独自

顧客が実際にレビューを書いた時期に基づいています。発売当初の高評価が続いたかどうかがわかります。

購入者の評価は一定を保っています
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '24: 5.0★ · 1 レビューQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 レビュー11Q1 '24Q2 '25
平均評価満足(4〜5★)不満(1〜2★)バーの高さ = レビュー件数

日付のある顧客レビュー 2 件を暦四半期ごとに集計しています。期間別の分析は英語です。

実証データ

Performance

The multi-core score of 84,492 in PassMark puts this chip in the 98th percentile, basically top of the charts for raw throughput. AI workloads land in the same territory. The 256MB of L3 cache helps keep those 64 cores fed. Single-thread at 2,517 is solid but nothing special, landing around the 71st percentile. Efficiency is the weak spot at 40.9 out of 100, which makes sense when you're pushing 280W through a server socket. PCIe 4.0 support is there, but it's not the newest platform anymore.

Performance Percentiles

AI 97.9
Feature 77.1
Platform 84.2
Efficiency 85.7
Multi Thread 97.9
ユーザー評価 58
Affordability 2.4
Single Thread 70.1

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

Brand AMD
Series EPYC
Model 7763
Codename Milan
Class server
Process 7

Cores & Clocks

Cores 64
P-cores 64
Threads 128
Base Clock 3500
Boost Clock 3500

Cache

L2 Cache 32
L3 Cache 256 MB

Performance

PassMark Multi 84004
PassMark Single 2518

Memory

Memory Type DDR4
Max Speed 3200
ECC Yes

Platform & Power

Socket LGA 4094
PCIe 4
PCIe Lanes 128
TDP 280
Unlocked No

vs Competition

Against something like the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the EPYC 7763 wins on raw core count and multi-threaded throughput, but loses on single-thread and platform modernity. The Core Ultra 9 is a consumer desktop chip with much better efficiency and newer features. The other competitors in our list, like the HP Xeon P67080-B21 or the Lenovo Ryzen 5 spare part, aren't really in the same league for this kind of server workload. The EPYC 7763 is a specialized tool, not a generalist.

Spec AMD EPYC 7763 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 SMC EPYC 9555P D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21
Cores 64 24 32 64 18 16
Threads 128 24 64 128 36 32
Boost Clock Mhz 3500 5700 3500 4400 4400 3900
L3 Cache Mb 256 36 256 256 24.75 37.5
Tdp W 280 125 200 360 165 195
Socket LGA 4094 LGA 1851 Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462) AMD Socket SP5 LGA2066 LGA 4677
Integrated Graphics - Intel Graphics No - - No
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
製品 AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti Threadユーザー評価AffordabilitySingle Thread
AMD EPYC 7763 97.977.184.285.797.9582.470.1
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare 96.299.995.99796.290.418.499.9
Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Compare 99.190.976.497.499.1088.488.7
SMC EPYC 9555P Compare 99.377.196.888.999.400.485.2
D&H Core i9 BX80673I99980X Compare 97.362.682.599.499.872.47.795.7
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Xeon P67080-B21 Compare 91.877.190.778.189.402.779.7

価格

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. EUR listings range from 1,519 to 2,861 across three vendors, with the best deal coming from the DE store. USD sits at 2,593 and GBP at 3,044. For a 64-core server chip, the low end of that EUR range is actually pretty reasonable if you need this much compute. But you'll also need a compatible SP3 motherboard, ECC DDR4, and cooling that can handle 280W. The platform costs add up fast.

2026年6月14日からこの製品の価格を追跡しています。データが増えるとチャートが表示されます。

詳細情報

Overview

The AMD EPYC 7763 is a 64-core, 128-thread monster built for servers and heavy workstation loads. It's the kind of chip you buy when your workload laughs at consumer CPUs. With 256MB of L3 cache and a 280W TDP, this thing is all about throughput.

Single-thread performance is fine but not exciting. Multi-thread is where it flexes. Our database puts it in the top tier for multi-core and AI workloads, which is exactly what you'd expect from a Milan-era EPYC.

Common Questions

Q: What motherboard do I need for the EPYC 7763?

You'll need a server board with an SP3 socket (LGA 4094) that supports Milan EPYC CPUs. Check the board's CPU compatibility list before buying.

Q: Is this good for gaming?

Not really. The single-thread score of 2,517 is fine but nothing special, and you'd be paying for 64 cores you'd never use in games. A consumer CPU makes way more sense.

Q: How much cooling does this chip need?

With a 280W TDP, you'll want a serious server-grade cooler or liquid cooling. Don't expect a standard desktop air cooler to handle it.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need strong single-thread performance or care about efficiency. The 280W TDP and older PCIe 4.0 platform make it a poor fit for general desktop use. If you're not running heavily parallelized server or AI workloads, you're paying for cores you'll never use.

Verdict

If you're building a server or a workstation that runs heavily parallelized workloads, virtualization, or AI inference, this chip is a beast. It's not for gamers or casual users. The single-thread performance won't blow you away, and the power draw is substantial. But for the right workload, those 64 cores will chew through everything you throw at them.

Usage Scores

総合 (79.9)AI/LLM (82)Budget (41.7)ゲーム (47)Server (86.7)Efficiency (40.9)Productivity (91.8)

類似製品