SanDisk 4TB SSD PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2280
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The Optimus 5100 hits 7,100 MB/s reads and 6,700 MB/s writes, landing in the 87th percentile for speed. But it's a DRAM-less QLC drive with a 13th percentile affordability score, which makes the $600 USD price tag hard to justify. The 1,200 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty are solid, but the competition offers better hardware for less.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 4TB capacity in the 93rd percentile for storage 94th
- 7,100 MB/s reads and 6,700 MB/s writes, 87th percentile speed 93rd
- 1,100K random write IOPS is unusually strong for QLC 87th
- 1,200 TBW endurance with a 5-year warranty 76th
- 94th percentile random performance overall
Points faibles
- DRAM-less design hurts sustained performance
- QLC NAND is slower than TLC under heavy writes
- Feature set is bare, 15th percentile
- Affordability is rough at 13th percentile
- Portable score of 19.9 out of 100 is a weak spot
Les preuves
Performance
Sequential reads top out at 7,100 MB/s and writes at 6,700 MB/s. That's 87th percentile speed in our database, which means this drive is faster than most PCIe 4.0 drives we've tested, but it's not the absolute fastest. The random performance is where things get interesting: 900K random read IOPS and 1,100K random write IOPS. The write number is actually the stronger of the two, which is unusual. Most drives favor reads, so if your workload involves lots of small file writes, this drive handles that better than you'd expect from a QLC drive.
The DRAM-less design is the elephant in the room. SanDisk leans on their nCache 4.0 technology to compensate, and for bursty workloads it mostly works. But sustained writes to a nearly full drive will show the QLC and no-DRAM limitations. The 94th percentile random performance ranking suggests SanDisk's controller and caching are doing real work here, but we'd still be cautious about hammering this drive with massive sustained write sessions.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 4000 |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 7100 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 6700 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 900000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 1100000 |
Hardware
| NAND | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | No |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 1200 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1750000 |
| Warranty (years) | 5 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
vs Competition
Against the Western Digital Black SN850X, the Optimus 5100 gives up DRAM and TLC NAND, which are significant hardware downgrades. The SN850X is a proven performer with better sustained write performance. The Samsung 9100 PRO is in a different league entirely, with faster speeds and a more robust feature set. The Kingston FURY Renegade G5 and Crucial T500 both offer DRAM-equipped TLC designs that will hold up better under sustained loads. The Seagate FireCuda 530R is another strong alternative with better endurance ratings. The Optimus 5100's main advantage is the 4TB capacity at this specific price point, but even that is undercut by the competition when you factor in the hardware compromises.
| Spec | SanDisk 4TB SSD | Samsung 9100 PRO | Western Digital Black SN850X | Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 | Crucial T500 | Seagate FireCuda 530R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 2TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 7,100 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | QLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | false | true | true | true | true | false |
| Endurance | 1200 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4000 TBW | 1200 TBW | 5050 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | Endurance | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SanDisk 4TB SSD | 86.5 | 94 | 14.6 | 92.5 | 75.5 | 12.7 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.1 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.5 | 85.9 | 5.3 |
| Western Digital Black SN850X Compare | 88.5 | 95.2 | 89 | 92.5 | 88 | 10.7 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare | 99.4 | 98.7 | 90.5 | 92.5 | 93.4 | 6.5 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 93.8 | 96.5 | 98.9 | 78.4 | 82.9 | 19.9 |
| Seagate FireCuda 530R Compare | 92.6 | 96.4 | 53.7 | 92.5 | 95.6 | 6.9 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
At $600 USD or $855 CAD, the Optimus 5100 is not cheap. The affordability percentile sits at 13th, which means you're paying a premium for the 4TB capacity and the SanDisk name. The price per terabyte works out to $150 USD per TB, which is on the higher side for a QLC DRAM-less drive. You can find TLC drives with DRAM at similar or lower prices if you shop around. The 5-year warranty and 1,200 TBW endurance add some peace of mind, but the value proposition is shaky when competitors offer better hardware for less money.
En savoir plus
Overview
The SanDisk Optimus 5100 is a 4TB PCIe 4.0 drive that hits 7,100 MB/s reads and 6,700 MB/s writes, which puts it in the 87th percentile for speed in our database. That's fast enough to make large file transfers feel nearly instant, and the 4TB capacity lands it in the 93rd percentile, so you're getting serious storage headroom. But there's a catch: it's a DRAM-less QLC drive, and the feature set is thin, sitting at the 15th percentile. You're paying for raw capacity and speed, not extras.
The endurance story is more encouraging. SanDisk rates this 4TB model at 1,200 TBW, which is 75th percentile territory. That's not class-leading, but it's respectable for a QLC drive, and the 5-year warranty backs it up. The 1.75 million hour MTBF is a nice spec sheet number too, though we always take those with a grain of salt. The real question is whether the price makes sense, and at $600 USD or $855 CAD, it's fighting in a crowded field.
Common Questions
Q: Is the SanDisk Optimus 5100 good for gaming?
The 7,100 MB/s read speed and 900K random read IOPS will load games quickly, and the 4TB capacity means you can store a massive library. But the console score of 70.5 out of 100 suggests it's not the best fit for PS5 use, where sustained performance matters more than peak speeds.
Q: How does the DRAM-less design affect real-world performance?
For everyday tasks and bursty workloads, the nCache 4.0 technology compensates well, and the 94th percentile random performance shows the controller is doing solid work. But sustained large file transfers will slow down as the cache fills, which is a known limitation of DRAM-less QLC drives.
Q: Is the 1,200 TBW endurance rating good for a 4TB QLC drive?
Yes, 1,200 TBW is respectable for QLC NAND and puts this drive in the 75th percentile for endurance. That works out to about 657 GB of writes per day for 5 years, which is more than enough for typical creator workloads and everyday use.
Who Should Skip This
If you're doing heavy sustained write workloads like 4K video editing with large file transfers, the DRAM-less QLC design will frustrate you. The portable score of 19.9 out of 100 is a red flag for anyone who needs to move this drive between systems frequently. And if you're price-sensitive, the 13th percentile affordability ranking means you can find better value elsewhere. The feature set is also bare at the 15th percentile, so if you want hardware encryption or other extras, look at the Samsung 9100 PRO or WD Black SN850X instead.
Verdict
The SanDisk Optimus 5100 is a fast drive with a lot of storage, but the DRAM-less QLC design makes it a tough sell at this price. The 7,100 MB/s reads and 6,700 MB/s writes are genuinely impressive for a QLC drive, and the 1,200 TBW endurance is better than expected. But the 13th percentile affordability score tells the real story: you're paying premium prices for mid-tier hardware. If you need 4TB of fast storage and you find this on sale, it's worth considering. At full price, there are better options.