AMD 100-000000312
La puce EPYC Milan à 64 cœurs et 128 threads, avec une fréquence boost de 3,5 GHz et 256 Mo de cache L3, offre des performances multitâches de premier ordre, avec un score PassMark de 84492. Son support PCIe 4.0 et sa mémoire DDR4 ECC en font un choix solide pour les charges de travail serveur intensives, bien que son TDP de 280 W limite l'efficacité énergétique. Idéal pour les exploitants de centres de données qui exécutent des tâches de virtualisation, de base de données ou d'inférence IA nécessitant un nombre maximal de cœurs plutôt qu'une faible consommation.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The EPYC 7763 is a 64-core server monster with top-tier multi-core and AI performance. Single-thread is average and efficiency is rough at 280W. Worth it if you need massive parallel throughput and can find a good deal, especially in the EUR 1,519 range.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 64 cores and 128 threads crush multi-threaded workloads 98th
- 256MB of L3 cache keeps data close to the cores 98th
- Top-tier AI and multi-core performance in our database 85th
- ECC DDR4 support for serious stability 84th
Points faibles
- 280W TDP means serious cooling and power bills
- Single-thread performance is just okay
- Efficiency score is the weakest area at 40.9
- PCIe 4.0 only, no Gen 5 support
L'avis des propriétaires
The Word on the Street
Les preuves
Performance
The multi-core score of 84,492 in PassMark puts this chip in the 98th percentile, basically top of the charts for raw throughput. AI workloads land in the same territory. The 256MB of L3 cache helps keep those 64 cores fed. Single-thread at 2,517 is solid but nothing special, landing around the 71st percentile. Efficiency is the weak spot at 40.9 out of 100, which makes sense when you're pushing 280W through a server socket. PCIe 4.0 support is there, but it's not the newest platform anymore.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | AMD |
| Series | EPYC |
| Model | 7763 |
| Codename | Milan |
| Class | server |
| Process | 7 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 64 |
| P-cores | 64 |
| Threads | 128 |
| Base Clock | 3500 |
| Boost Clock | 3500 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 32 |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 84492 |
| PassMark Single | 2517 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | 3200 |
| ECC | Yes |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA 4094 |
| PCIe | 4 |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 |
| TDP | 280 |
| Unlocked | No |
vs Competition
Against something like the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the EPYC 7763 wins on raw core count and multi-threaded throughput, but loses on single-thread and platform modernity. The Core Ultra 9 is a consumer desktop chip with much better efficiency and newer features. The other competitors in our list, like the HP Xeon P67080-B21 or the Lenovo Ryzen 5 spare part, aren't really in the same league for this kind of server workload. The EPYC 7763 is a specialized tool, not a generalist.
| Spec | AMD 100-000000312 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | HP Xeon P67080-B21 | Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: | KOMQI Core i3 BX80646I34150 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 64 | 24 | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 128 | 24 | 48 | 32 | 12 | 4 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3500 | 5700 | 4000 | 3900 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 256 | 36 | 128 | 37.5 | 8 | 3 |
| Tdp W | 280 | 125 | 200 | 195 | 15 | 54 |
| Socket | LGA 4094 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP3 | LGA 4677 | AM4 | LGA 1150 |
| Integrated Graphics | - | Intel Graphics | - | No | AMD Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Preuve sociale | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD 100-000000312 | 97.8 | 76.9 | 84.1 | 85.3 | 98.1 | 59.1 | 70.5 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.8 | 95.9 | 97.1 | 96.6 | 90.7 | 99.8 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 76.9 | 84.1 | 83.8 | 94.4 | 38.3 | 80.2 |
| HP Xeon P67080-B21 Compare | 91.7 | 76.9 | 90.7 | 78.2 | 90.9 | 1.5 | 80.4 |
| Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: Compare | 64 | 54.6 | 56.8 | 99.3 | 64.8 | 11.8 | 66.4 |
| KOMQI Core i3 BX80646I34150 Compare | 34.2 | 54.6 | 60.1 | 43.7 | 31.4 | 78.7 | 50 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. EUR listings range from 1,519 to 2,861 across three vendors, with the best deal coming from the DE store. USD sits at 2,593 and GBP at 3,044. For a 64-core server chip, the low end of that EUR range is actually pretty reasonable if you need this much compute. But you'll also need a compatible SP3 motherboard, ECC DDR4, and cooling that can handle 280W. The platform costs add up fast.
Nous suivons les prix de ce produit depuis le 14 juin 2026. Le graphique apparaîtra dès que nous aurons plus de données.
En savoir plus
Overview
The AMD EPYC 7763 is a 64-core, 128-thread monster built for servers and heavy workstation loads. It's the kind of chip you buy when your workload laughs at consumer CPUs. With 256MB of L3 cache and a 280W TDP, this thing is all about throughput.
Single-thread performance is fine but not exciting. Multi-thread is where it flexes. Our database puts it in the top tier for multi-core and AI workloads, which is exactly what you'd expect from a Milan-era EPYC.
Common Questions
Q: What motherboard do I need for the EPYC 7763?
You'll need a server board with an SP3 socket (LGA 4094) that supports Milan EPYC CPUs. Check the board's CPU compatibility list before buying.
Q: Is this good for gaming?
Not really. The single-thread score of 2,517 is fine but nothing special, and you'd be paying for 64 cores you'd never use in games. A consumer CPU makes way more sense.
Q: How much cooling does this chip need?
With a 280W TDP, you'll want a serious server-grade cooler or liquid cooling. Don't expect a standard desktop air cooler to handle it.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need strong single-thread performance or care about efficiency. The 280W TDP and older PCIe 4.0 platform make it a poor fit for general desktop use. If you're not running heavily parallelized server or AI workloads, you're paying for cores you'll never use.
Verdict
If you're building a server or a workstation that runs heavily parallelized workloads, virtualization, or AI inference, this chip is a beast. It's not for gamers or casual users. The single-thread performance won't blow you away, and the power draw is substantial. But for the right workload, those 64 cores will chew through everything you throw at them.
