New

Gigastone Game Turbo

★★★★★ 4.6 (375)
Capacity 256GB
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Read Speed 540 MB/s
NAND TLC
Gigastone Game Turbo ssd
36 Overall Score

No current retailer price

Also available in:

Snapshot

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Strong social proof (79th percentile) 79th

Cons

  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)
  • Below average speed (18th percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

What owners think

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
76/100Our AI sentiment readmedium confidence · 21 sources · Nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '20: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '20: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '24: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '24: 1.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '25: 3.7★ · 3 reviewsQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '25: 3.4★ · 5 reviewsQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 2 reviews1111112113152Q3 '20Q4 '20Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q2 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q3 202560/1003.4★5 reviews

    Buyers report mixed experiences: some praise speed and value, while others cite severe slowness, read/write failures, and one drive failing within weeks.

    • One drive failed after 15-20 days; another reports very slow performance and read/write errors.
    • Several buyers find drives fast, reliable, and suitable for restoring old PCs or as multi-pack value.
    • Performance varies: one user reports good speed, another says very slow even under light use.
  2. Q1 202567/1003.7★3 reviews

    Buyers report strong performance in Proxmox and Xbox use, but one reviewer found SATA drives faster, noting slower read/write times.

    • Great performance in Proxmox VM and ZFS RAID, boosting VM performance.
    • Works well in Xbox, reducing load times significantly after two weeks.
    • Slower read/write times compared to SATA drives, surprising for SSD.

Based on 21 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Performance Percentiles

Speed 17.6
Random 22.1
Feature 52.8
Capacity 17.5
User Sentiment 38.2
Endurance 57
Social Proof 78.9

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 256
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Protocol SATA
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 540

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption No

vs Competition

Spec Gigastone Game Turbo Samsung 9100 PRO Western Digital WD Black SN850X Crucial T500 Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Seagate FireCuda 530R
Capacity 256GB 8TB 4TB 2TB 2TB 4TB
Form Factor 2.5" M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface SATA III PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 540 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache false true true true true false
Endurance - 4800 TBW 2400 TBW 1200 TBW 2000 TBW 5050 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceSocial Proof
Gigastone Game Turbo 17.622.152.817.538.25778.9
Samsung 9100 PRO Compare 99.199.899.898.1085.695.4
Western Digital WD Black SN850X Compare 88.395.193.992.59580.695.4
Crucial T500 Compare 93.796.49978.379.482.695.4
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare 92.993.893.978.367.493.795.4
Seagate FireCuda 530R Compare 92.596.352.892.565.495.588

Usage Scores

Overall (36.1)Budget (49.5)Gaming (23)Laptop (36.6)Console (11.5)Portable (9.1)Workstation (32.3)

A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.

Other Configurations3

Similar Products