Überblick
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
Nachteile
- Below average build (7th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average video (24th percentile)
- Below average sensor (30th percentile)
Die Fakten
Leistung
Technische Daten
Alle technischen Daten
Build
| Weight | 0.2 kg / 0.5 lbs |
Im Vergleich
| Spec | Ricoh 01492 | Fujifilm X-S X-S20 | Sony Alpha a7R III | OM System OM-1 | Nikon Z Z6 | Panasonic LUMIX S S1RII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | - | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless | mirrorless |
| Sensor | - | 26.1MP aps-c | 42.4MP full-frame | 20.4MP micro-four-thirds | 24.5MP full-frame | 44.3MP full-frame |
| AF Points | - | 117 | 399 | 1053 | 273 | 779 |
| Burst FPS | - | 20 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 40 |
| Video | - | 6K @60fps | 4K @30fps | 4K @60fps | 4K @30fps | 8K @120fps |
| IBIS | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 240 | 491 | 235 | 511 | 585 | 710 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produkt | AF | EVF | Build | Burst | Video | Sensor | Battery | Display | Connectivity | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricoh 01492 | 36.7 | 40.4 | 6.5 | 34.2 | 24.4 | 29.7 | 46.7 | 30.7 | 22.2 | 36.4 |
| Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Compare | 83.9 | 82.5 | 80.4 | 87.3 | 87.1 | 96.3 | 99.1 | 99.3 | 95.3 | 95.8 |
| Sony Alpha a7R III Compare | 90.3 | 94.9 | 88.3 | 81.2 | 75.7 | 70.4 | 96.4 | 98.8 | 95.3 | 89.3 |
| OM System OM-1 Compare | 96.1 | 98 | 85.7 | 94.8 | 87.1 | 49.5 | 95.9 | 87.4 | 89 | 89.3 |
| Nikon Z Z6 Compare | 85.7 | 94.9 | 94.9 | 78.9 | 75.7 | 60.8 | 91.3 | 87.4 | 95.3 | 89.3 |
| Panasonic LUMIX S S1RII Compare | 98.1 | 96.7 | 97.1 | 90.5 | 98.9 | 70.9 | 92 | 87.4 | 95.3 | 98.7 |
Preis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Ab 468 €
Amazon.es 1 Angebot Ab 468 €
Price History
Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich
Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.
