Canon EOS R R50 V

★★★★☆ 4.0 (9)

sensorThe 24MP full-frame and 4K video capture stand out in a compact, lightweight body, though it lacks in-body stabilization and weather sealing. Its compact design and versatile lens options make it a portable option for everyday shooting. This camera is best for stills-focused photographers wanting full-frame quality in a travel-friendly size, not for serious video work or vlogging.

Type mirrorless
Sensor 24MP full-frame
AF Points 4503 pts
Burst 15 fps
Video 4K @60fps
Weight 962 g
Canon EOS R R50 V camera
54 Gesamtbewertung
Preis 0 €
Keine Angebote verfügbar

Überblick

Vor- und Nachteile

Vorteile

  • Strong af (100th percentile) 100th
  • Strong connectivity (95th percentile) 95th
  • Strong display (87th percentile) 87th
  • Strong video (83rd percentile) 83rd

Nachteile

  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)

Was Besitzer sagen

Wie sich die Meinung der Besitzer im Lauf der Zeit verändert hat

Exklusiv

Basierend darauf, wann Kunden ihre Bewertungen tatsächlich geschrieben haben - so sehen Sie, ob das anfängliche Lob anhielt.

Die Meinung der Besitzer ist über die Zeit stabil geblieben
1★2★3★4★5★Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 2 BewertungenQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 1 BewertungQ4 '25: 3.7★ · 4 BewertungenQ1 '26: 3.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ2 '26: 5.0★ · 4 BewertungenQ3 '26: 5.0★ · 1 Bewertung214441Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26Q2 '26Q3 '26
Ø BewertungZufrieden (4-5★)Unzufrieden (1-2★)Balkenhöhe = Anzahl der Bewertungen
  1. Q2 2026100/1005.0★4 Bewertungen

    All reviews are 5-star, praising the camera's ease of use, image quality, and connectivity features. Ideal for beginners and content creators.

    • Excellent image quality and easy to use for beginners.
    • Bluetooth and WiFi connectivity for real-time photo transfer.
    • Great value as a travel or scout camera.
    • Suitable for content creation and adding lenses.
  2. Q1 202650/1003.0★4 Bewertungen

    Buyers are split: power users praise value and advanced features; others find it complex with poor software and fragile build.

    • Excellent video/image quality with L-series or good lenses, especially 4K30 HDR.
    • Software connectivity and app experience are unreliable, slow, and frustrating.
    • Camera is overly complex to operate, requiring significant technical knowledge.
    • Small, lightweight body praised for portability but feels fragile and cramped for large hands.
  3. Q4 202560/1003.8★4 Bewertungen

    Mixed feedback: praised for value, video quality, and ease of use, but criticized for motion blur, poor livestream connectivity, and limited lens ecosystem.

    • Excellent value with cheap lens ecosystem, USB charging, and modern features
    • Motion blur and slow autofocus during panning
    • Unreliable livestream connectivity even with paid software
    • Chronic shortage of compatible RF-S lenses

Basierend auf 16 datierten Kundenbewertungen, gruppiert nach Kalenderquartal. Die Periodenanalyse ist in englischer Sprache.

Die Fakten

Leistung

Leistungsperzentile

AF 99.8
EVF 39.9
Build 58.1
Burst 79.4
Video 83.1
Sensor 50.3
Battery 46.6
Display 86.9
Connectivity 95.1
Nutzerresonanz 17.7
Stabilization 35.8

Technische Daten

Alle technischen Daten

Sensor

Type CMOS
Size full-frame
Megapixels 24 MP
ISO Range 100
Processor DIGIC X

Autofocus

AF Points 4503
AF Type PhotoPhase Detection: 4503VideoPhase Detection: 3713
Eye AF Yes
Animal AF Yes
Subject Detection Yes

Shooting

Burst (Mechanical) 15
Max Shutter 1/8000
Electronic Shutter Yes

Video

Max Resolution 4K
4K FPS 60
1080p FPS 120
10-bit Yes
Log Profile Yes
Codec XF-AVC S, XF-HEVC S, H.264, H.265

Display & EVF

Screen Size 3"
Touchscreen Yes
Articulating Yes

Build

Weight 1.0 kg / 2.1 lbs

Connectivity

Wi-Fi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB USB-C
HDMI Micro-HDMI
Hot Shoe Yes

Im Vergleich

Spec Canon EOS R R50 V Fujifilm X-H2S Sony a7R V Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Nikon Z5 II OM System OM-1
Type mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless mirrorless
Sensor 24MP full-frame 26.2MP aps-c 61MP full-frame 25.2MP micro-four-thirds 24.5MP full-frame 20.4MP micro-four-thirds
AF Points 4503 425 693 315 273 1053
Burst FPS 15 40 10 75 30 10
Video 4K @60fps 6K @120fps 8K @60fps 6K @120fps 4K @60fps 4K @60fps
IBIS false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 962 579 723 721 620 511
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produkt AFEVFBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayConnectivityNutzerresonanzStabilization
Canon EOS R R50 V 99.839.958.179.483.150.346.686.995.117.735.8
Fujifilm X-H2S Compare 90.896.794.693.497.896.798.598.995.193.895.5
Sony a7R V Compare 95.699.297.278.295.877.994.286.995.197.698.6
Panasonic LUMIX GH7 Compare 88.590.597.195.297.561.491.886.995.178.197.1
Nikon Z5 II Compare 87.291.595.688.887.659.192.786.995.199.588.7
OM System OM-1 Compare 9697.985.294.786.447.295.786.988.384.588.7

Bewertung nach Einsatzbereich

Gesamt (54)Video (61.6)Travel (31.7)Youtube (62.2)Beginner (58.2)Vlogging (50.1)Streaming (57.3)Photography (52.9)Wedding Events (49.3)Sports Wildlife (54.5)Product Photography (57.5)

Ein ausführlicher Testbericht folgt in Kürze. Die technischen Daten, Bewertungen, Preise und Diagramme oben sind stets aktuell.

Ähnliche Produkte