Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm
15 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Pedtail BU080A

Pedtail BU080A

Pedtail
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Youtube
Fujifilm
11
Pedtail
60
Product Photography
Fujifilm
8
Pedtail
57
Video
Fujifilm
13
Pedtail
55
Beginner
Fujifilm
16
Pedtail
47
Photography
Fujifilm
11
Pedtail
46
Vlogging
Fujifilm
12
Pedtail
44
Streaming
Fujifilm
15
Pedtail
43
Wedding Events
Fujifilm
11
Pedtail
39
Travel
Fujifilm
10
Pedtail
31
Sports Wildlife
Fujifilm
12
Pedtail
30

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400Pedtail BU080A
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/1.7-inch1/3-inch
Megapixels10 MP75 MP
Autofocus
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution5K
Log Profile
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Touchscreen
Articulating
Build
Weight0.20 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

  • Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)

Pedtail BU080A

  • Strong sensor (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong video (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong display (73rd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

Preise

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green is 162 € cheaper (5.1x less).

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.376Score pro Dollar
vs
Pedtail BU080A0.222Score pro Dollar

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green bietet 1.7x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Pedtail BU080A

Fazit

Gewinner: Pedtail BU080A

Scores 45 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.

Pedtail BU080A Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen