Kodak Charmera 1987

Kodak Charmera 1987

Kodak
17 Gesamtbewertung
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026

LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026

LIYTIFOR
47 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Product Photography
Kodak
8
LIYTIFOR
56
Streaming
Kodak
10
LIYTIFOR
56
Beginner
Kodak
17
LIYTIFOR
48
Video
Kodak
17
LIYTIFOR
46
Photography
Kodak
13
LIYTIFOR
46
Youtube
Kodak
11
LIYTIFOR
45
Wedding Events
Kodak
12
LIYTIFOR
42
Sports Wildlife
Kodak
15
LIYTIFOR
40
Travel
Kodak
11
LIYTIFOR
38
Vlogging
Kodak
8
LIYTIFOR
37

Spezifikationen

Kodak Charmera 1987LIYTIFOR LR1
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/2.3-inch
Megapixels1.600000023841858 MP80 MP
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)30 fps
Video
Max Resolution1080p5K
Log Profile
CodecJPEG/MP4
Display & EVF
Screen Size3.5"
Build
Weight0.29 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
USBUSB-C
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak Charmera 1987

  • Below average sensor (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)
  • Below average display (31st percentile)

LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026

  • Strong burst (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong sensor (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong video (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average display (31st percentile)

Preise

Kodak Charmera 1987 is 173 € cheaper (5.8x less).

Kodak Charmera 19870.481Score pro Dollar
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 20260.224Score pro Dollar

Kodak Charmera 1987 bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kodak Charmera 1987

LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026

Fazit

Gewinner: LIYTIFOR LR1

Scores 47 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 8 of 12 specs.

LIYTIFOR LR1 Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Auch in Betracht ziehen