Acer XV273K Pbmiipphzx
Combining a 4K IPS panel with a 144Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time, this monitor delivers fluid, high-resolution gaming with G-Sync compatibility to eliminate tearing. Quantum Dot technology provides 95% DCI-P3 coverage and a Delta E<1 rating for exceptional color accuracy right out of the box. It is best for gamers who also demand color-critical precision for content creation, though its 5.1kg weight makes it a purely desktop-bound solution.
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The Acer Nitro XV273K is a 27-inch 4K 144Hz IPS monitor with fantastic color accuracy and a frustrating dual-cable requirement for its top refresh rate. Stick to 120Hz over a single cable and you'll get a sharp, vibrant, and smooth gaming experience that also handles color-critical work. It's a killer value if you can find it around $450, but skip it if you want true HDR or plug-and-play simplicity.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- Stunning color accuracy with 95% DCI-P3 and Delta E <1 out of the box 100th
- Sharp 4K resolution at 27 inches makes for incredibly detailed visuals 91st
- Silent operation with no cooling fan, unlike some high-end G-Sync monitors 90th
- Excellent connectivity with 2x DisplayPort, 2x HDMI, and 4x USB 3.0 ports 81st
- Solid build quality with full ergonomic adjustments including pivot
Points faibles
- 144Hz mode requires two DisplayPort cables and disables HDR and FreeSync
- Out-of-the-box brightness is too high, causing noticeable backlight bleed
- OSD controls are clunky and settings reset after exiting HDR mode
- DisplayHDR 400 is basic with no local dimming for real HDR impact
- The blue LED power indicator on the bottom bezel cannot be turned off
L'avis des propriétaires
The Word on the Street
Les preuves
Performance
In practice, the 4K resolution at 27 inches gives you an incredibly sharp image. Text is crisp, and games look detailed enough to make you lean in and stare at textures. The 144Hz refresh rate makes everything feel responsive, but there's a big asterisk here. To actually hit 144Hz, you need to connect two DisplayPort cables to your PC, which effectively turns the monitor into two side-by-side 1920x2160 panels stitched together. It works, but it disables HDR and FreeSync, and it's a hassle. Running at 120Hz over a single cable is the sweet spot for most people, and honestly, the difference between 120Hz and 144Hz is subtle enough that you might not care.
The color performance is where this panel really shines. With 95% DCI-P3 coverage and a factory Delta E under 1, colors are accurate and vibrant right out of the box. The quantum dot layer makes reds and greens pop in a way that standard sRGB monitors just can't match. The 400-nit brightness is fine for a dimly lit room, but the DisplayHDR 400 certification is more of a checkbox feature than a real HDR experience. You'll get a slightly brighter highlight here and there, but there's no local dimming, so don't expect OLED-level contrast. The 1ms VRB response time is Acer's backlight strobing tech, which reduces motion blur nicely but drops the brightness a bit when enabled.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 (4K UHD) |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 400 nits |
| Color Gamut | 130% sRGB, 95% DCI-P3 |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 |
Connectivity
| HDMI Ports | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 2 |
| USB-C | 4 |
| Speakers | Yes |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | Yes |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes |
| Pivot | Yes |
Features
| Weight | 5.1 kg / 11.3 lbs |
vs Competition
Compared to something like the MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2, the Acer holds its own on sharpness and text clarity thanks to the higher pixel density, but it can't touch the OLED's perfect blacks and true HDR performance. The MSI is the better pure gaming and media consumption monitor if contrast is your priority. On the other hand, the Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA is a more modern 4K OLED competitor that solves the text clarity issues of older OLEDs, but it'll cost you significantly more. The Acer's IPS panel is a safer bet if you do a lot of productivity work and worry about OLED burn-in over time.
The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG and Samsung Odyssey G60SD are both high-refresh 1440p competitors that prioritize speed over resolution. If you're a competitive esports player who needs 240Hz or higher and doesn't care about 4K, those are better fits. The Acer is for the gamer who wants their single-player RPGs to look razor-sharp and is willing to trade a bit of speed for that pixel density. The LG UltraGear 27GX790A-B is another 4K option, but the Acer's quantum dot layer gives it an edge in color volume that the LG's standard IPS panel can't quite match.
| Spec | Acer XV273K Pbmiipphzx | LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B | ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 | Samsung Odyssey G60SD | Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27 | 44.5 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | QD-OLED | OLED |
| Refresh Rate | 144 | 165 | 500 | 240 | 360 | 240 |
| Response Time Ms | 1 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 | 0.029999999329447746 |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Hdr | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR10+ | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | Color | Portabilité | Display | Feature | Ergonomic | Performance | Connectivity | Preuve sociale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer XV273K Pbmiipphzx | 91.3 | 75.1 | 90 | 73.9 | 81.1 | 76.8 | 99.9 | 73.6 |
| LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B Compare | 99.5 | 79.5 | 99.8 | 97.3 | 91.9 | 97 | 97.5 | 95.4 |
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDPG Compare | 99.2 | 63.5 | 79.3 | 73.9 | 91.9 | 99.9 | 94.6 | 98.2 |
| MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 Compare | 99.2 | 63.5 | 79.3 | 87.3 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 84.9 | 99.4 |
| Samsung Odyssey G60SD Compare | 92.3 | 46.6 | 79.3 | 73.9 | 91.9 | 99.6 | 89.9 | 95.4 |
| Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA Compare | 87.2 | 63.5 | 97.9 | 87.3 | 91.9 | 98.4 | 84.9 | 70.7 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
Pricing on this monitor is all over the place, with a spread from $320 to a frankly absurd $13,210 across different vendors. The realistic price for a new unit from a reputable seller should be in the $400 to $600 range, and at that price, it's a strong value for a 4K high-refresh monitor with this level of color accuracy. You're getting a panel that can pull double duty for gaming and color-sensitive work without needing to buy two separate displays. Just make sure you're not accidentally looking at a third-party seller listing it for the price of a used car. The sweet spot is finding it around the $450 mark, where it undercuts many newer 4K 144Hz options while still delivering excellent image quality.
Amazon.de 1 offre À partir de 974 €
Nous suivons les prix de ce produit depuis le 6 oct. 2026. Le graphique apparaîtra dès que nous aurons plus de données.
En savoir plus
Overview
The Acer Nitro XV273K is one of those monitors that, on paper, looks like it's trying to do everything at once. You've got a 27-inch 4K IPS panel, a 144Hz refresh rate, and a 1ms response time, all wrapped up with G-Sync compatibility and a quantum dot backlight. It's aimed squarely at the gamer who also dabbles in content creation, or maybe the creative pro who wants buttery smooth frames after hours. The spec sheet is genuinely stacked, and in our database it lands in the 90th percentile for display quality and a perfect 100th for connectivity, which is pretty wild for a monitor that launched a few years ago.
Common Questions
Q: Do I really need two DisplayPort cables to run this monitor at 144Hz?
Yes, to hit the full 144Hz at 4K, you need to connect two DisplayPort cables from your GPU to the monitor. This effectively runs the display as two 1920x2160 panels side by side. The downside is that this mode disables HDR and FreeSync/G-Sync. For most people, running a single cable at 120Hz is the better experience since you keep adaptive sync and HDR, and the jump from 120Hz to 144Hz is barely noticeable.
Q: Is this monitor good for photo and video editing?
It's surprisingly good for color-critical work. The factory calibration delivers a Delta E under 1, and the 95% DCI-P3 coverage with quantum dot technology gives you a wide, accurate color gamut. It's not a replacement for a dedicated reference monitor with hardware calibration, but for freelance editors, graphic designers, or hobbyists who also game, it's a solid choice.
Q: How is the HDR performance on this monitor?
The DisplayHDR 400 certification is pretty basic. It means the monitor can hit 400 nits of peak brightness and accept an HDR signal, but there's no local dimming, so you won't get the deep blacks and bright highlights that make good HDR pop. It's fine for a slight brightness boost in HDR games, but don't buy this monitor expecting a transformative HDR experience. A good SDR calibration looks better most of the time.
Q: Does this monitor work with Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync?
Yes, it's officially G-Sync Compatible and supports FreeSync. Over a single DisplayPort cable at 120Hz, adaptive sync works without issues on both Nvidia and AMD GPUs. Just remember that if you use the dual-cable 144Hz mode, both G-Sync and FreeSync are disabled, which is another reason to stick with the single-cable setup.
Who Should Skip This
If you want a monitor that just works out of the box without fiddling with settings, look elsewhere. The setup process, from enabling 144Hz to taming the backlight bleed, requires patience and a willingness to dig through clunky menus. Console gamers should also think twice. The HDMI 2.0 ports mean you're limited to 4K at 60Hz on a PS5 or Xbox Series X, so you won't get the high-refresh 4K experience those consoles can output. A monitor with HDMI 2.1 would be a much better fit for current-gen consoles.
Professional colorists and HDR content creators should skip this too. While the SDR color accuracy is great, the edge-lit backlight and lack of real HDR hardware make it unsuitable for mastering HDR content. If your work requires true HDR reference monitoring, you'll need to spend significantly more on a display with full-array local dimming or an OLED panel. For that crowd, something like an LG OLED Pro or an Apple Pro Display XDR is the right tool, even if it costs several times more.
Verdict
If you're a gamer who also edits photos or videos on the side, the Acer Nitro XV273K is a fantastic dual-purpose monitor. The color accuracy is good enough for professional work, and the 120Hz refresh rate keeps games feeling smooth and responsive. Just plan on running it at 120Hz over a single DisplayPort cable and pretend the 144Hz dual-cable mode doesn't exist. You'll save yourself a headache and keep G-Sync and HDR working. For the price these go for now, it's a lot of monitor for the money.
For pure gamers who don't touch creative apps, there are better options. A fast 1440p OLED will give you a more immersive experience with deeper blacks and faster response times, even if you lose some sharpness. And if you need a monitor for professional color grading in HDR, this isn't it. The HDR is too limited, and the edge-lit backlight can't compete with a proper reference monitor. But for the hybrid user who wants one screen to rule them all, the XV273K still makes a compelling case years after its release.