New
PMY
The 48GB GDDR6 memory on this Quadro RTX 8000 handles large AI model training and rendering workloads without running out of VRAM, a key advantage over consumer cards. Its four DisplayPort outputs and PCIe 3.0 x16 interface support multi-monitor professional setups, though it lacks gaming-focused features. This card suits AI researchers and data scientists running LLM training or inference tasks, not gamers or general workstation users.
GPU Quadro RTX 8000
VRAM 48GB GDDR6
30 Overall Score
No current retailer price
Snapshot
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong ai (99th percentile) 99th
- Strong vram (99th percentile) 99th
Cons
- Below average rt (2nd percentile)
- Below average efficiency (2nd percentile)
- Below average raster (2nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (5th percentile)
The proof
Performance
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Quadro RTX 8000 |
Memory
| VRAM | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
vs Competition
| Spec | PMY | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 48GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 2407 | 2730 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | - | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | - | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | - | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | - | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMY | 98.6 | 1.9 | 98.6 | 2 | 11.2 | 6.6 | 2 | 5.4 | 5.8 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare | 85.3 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 15.1 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94 | 21 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.1 | 91.7 | 83.8 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 17.6 |
Usage Scores
- Overall30.2
- AI/LLM63.5
- Budget19.5
- Gaming 4k20.9
- Ray Tracing20
- Workstation38.3
- Gaming 1080p12.2
- Gaming 1440p16.7
- Content Creation31.5
A full written review is coming soon. The specs, scores, prices and charts above are always up to date.
