HP P36921-B21
The 12-core, 24-thread Xeon Silver 4310 with a 3.3GHz boost and 18MB L3 cache targets dual-socket servers needing PCIe 4.0 and up to 1024GB of DDR4 memory. Its 120W TDP and LGA4189 socket fit standard server boards, though gaming performance is weak at 11.8/100. Best for IT buyers upgrading existing 3rd-gen Xeon servers for virtualization or database workloads, not for gaming or desktop use.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Xeon Silver 4310 is a 12-core server chip with solid multi-threaded chops but terrible single-thread performance. It's overpriced for what it delivers and only makes sense as a drop-in upgrade for existing LGA4189 systems. Most buyers should look at AMD EPYC or newer Intel options instead.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- 12 cores and 24 threads handle parallel server tasks without breaking a sweat
- PCIe 4.0 support keeps storage and networking fast
- Supports up to 1TB of DDR4 memory for big virtualized workloads
- 10nm process keeps power draw reasonable for a server chip
Cons
- Single-thread performance is near the bottom of our charts
- 120W TDP is a lot of heat for the performance you get
- Priced like a premium part but delivers mid-tier results
- No integrated graphics, so you'll need a separate GPU for any display output
The proof
Performance
The 4310 pulls a 7363 multi-thread PassMark score, which lands it smack in the middle of the pack. That's fine for virtualization, light rendering, or file serving. But the single-thread score of 259 is near the bottom of our charts, and you'll feel it in anything that isn't heavily parallelized. The 18MB of L3 cache helps with some server workloads, but the 120W TDP means you're paying a real power bill for middling performance. PCIe 4.0 support is nice, but it's table stakes in 2025, not a selling point.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Processor
| Brand | Intel |
| Series | Xeon Silver |
| Model | 4310 |
| Class | server |
| Process | 10 |
Cores & Clocks
| Cores | 12 |
| Threads | 24 |
| Base Clock | 2100 |
| Boost Clock | 3300 |
Cache
| L2 Cache | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB |
Performance
| PassMark Multi | 7363 |
| PassMark Single | 259 |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR4 |
| Max Memory | 1024 |
Platform & Power
| Socket | LGA4189 |
| PCIe | 4 |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 |
| TDP | 120 |
| Max Turbo Power | 120 |
| Unlocked | No |
vs Competition
Stacked against something like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the 4310 gets embarrassed in single-threaded tasks and gaming. The Ryzen chip costs more but delivers dramatically better all-around performance. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K also runs circles around this Xeon in most workloads while sipping less power. Even in the server space, AMD's EPYC lineup offers better multi-threaded performance per dollar. The 4310 only makes sense if you're locked into Intel's Xeon ecosystem or need a drop-in upgrade for an existing LGA4189 board.
| Spec | HP P36921-B21 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | SMC EPYC 9555P | CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 12 | 16 | 24 | 64 | 24 | - |
| Threads | 24 | 32 | 24 | 128 | 48 | - |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 3300 | 5700 | 5700 | 4400 | 4000 | - |
| L3 Cache Mb | 18 | 128 | 36 | 256 | 128 | - |
| Tdp W | 120 | 120 | 125 | 360 | 200 | - |
| Socket | LGA4189 | AM5 | LGA 1851 | AMD Socket SP5 | AMD Socket SP3 | - |
| Integrated Graphics | - | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel Graphics | - | - | - |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | AI | Feature | Platform | Efficiency | Multi Thread | Affordability | Single Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP P36921-B21 | 37 | 20.6 | 62.7 | 42.7 | 52.6 | 9.5 | 7.1 |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Compare | 96 | 98.6 | 92.4 | 97 | 95.7 | 14.5 | 92.9 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Compare | 96.2 | 99.9 | 96 | 97.2 | 96.4 | 18.2 | 99.9 |
| SMC EPYC 9555P Compare | 99.3 | 77.2 | 96.8 | 89.6 | 99.4 | 0.4 | 85.9 |
| CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare | 94.8 | 77.2 | 84.5 | 85.1 | 93.9 | 5.1 | 80.4 |
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare | 85.8 | 20.6 | 17.4 | 66.6 | 97.1 | 6.3 | 98.4 |
Price
Value & Pricing
At $816 USD, this chip is a tough sell. You're paying server-grade money for performance that lands in the middle of the pack. The efficiency score is below average, and the affordability ranking is near the bottom of our database. If you're building a homelab or a small business server, there are cheaper options that deliver similar multi-threaded performance. Unless you specifically need the LGA4189 socket or HPE's validation, this feels like paying a brand tax.
Read more
Overview
The HP Xeon Silver 4310 is a server chip, plain and simple. Twelve cores, 24 threads, and a 2.1GHz base clock that boosts to 3.3GHz. It's built for data centers and workstations that need reliable multi-threaded grunt, not for gaming rigs or everyday desktops.
Our database puts this thing right in the middle for multi-threaded work, but the single-thread score is rough. If your workload leans on one fast core, this chip will feel sluggish. For parallel tasks, it's serviceable but not exciting.
Common Questions
Q: Can I use this processor for gaming?
Technically yes, but you shouldn't. The single-thread score of 259 is near the bottom of our charts, and most games lean hard on single-core speed. You'd also need a separate GPU since this chip has no integrated graphics.
Q: Does this processor support ECC memory?
Yes. As a Xeon server chip, it supports ECC DDR4 memory, which is critical for data integrity in server and workstation environments. You can load it up with up to 1TB of RAM.
Q: Is this a good choice for a home server or NAS?
It can work, but it's overkill for most home servers and the 120W TDP means higher electricity bills. A lower-power chip or even a used enterprise part would likely serve you better unless you're running heavy virtualization.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you need strong single-threaded performance for things like game servers, databases that don't parallelize well, or any desktop-style workload. Also skip it if power efficiency matters, because 120W for mid-tier performance is a bad trade. And if you're building a new server from scratch, AMD's EPYC lineup gives you way more bang for your buck.
Verdict
Buy this if you already have an LGA4189 server board and need a cheap-ish upgrade to 12 cores. It'll handle virtualization, file serving, and light compute tasks without complaint. But if you're building from scratch, look elsewhere. The single-thread weakness and mediocre efficiency make this a hard recommendation for anyone who isn't already committed to the platform.
Usage Scores
- Overall33.6
- AI/LLM32.8
- Budget19.1
- Gaming11.8
- Server42
- Efficiency20.6
- Productivity41.7