HP RTX 2000 Ada 16GB GDDR6 workstation
Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, this card stands out with 16GB of ECC GDDR6 memory and 2816 CUDA cores for error-corrected precision in compact workstations. Its 70W TDP and blower-style cooler enable dense multi-GPU deployment while driving four 5K displays natively. This GPU is best for engineers and scientists running certified professional applications where data integrity and multi-display setups are critical.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The HP RTX 2000 Ada is a 70W workstation card with 16GB of ECC VRAM and best-in-class efficiency. It scores 51.4 for workstation use but only 30.9 for 4K gaming. Worth it for pros who need ECC and low power, not for gamers.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 16GB of ECC VRAM is a lifesaver for long compute jobs. 99th
- 70W TDP means it sips power and fits in compact workstations. 67th
- Efficiency is best-in-class at the 99th percentile. 67th
- Four Mini DisplayPort 1.4a outputs drive up to four 5K displays.
Points faibles
- Thermal performance is a weak spot at the 21st percentile.
- Ray tracing and raster scores lag behind most cards.
- Blower cooler gets loud under sustained load.
- Price is hard to justify for non-workstation buyers.
Les preuves
Performance
The 2816 CUDA cores and 12 FP32 TFLOPS put this card in a weird spot. For workstation tasks, it's solid. The 16GB of ECC VRAM is a real selling point for anyone running long renders or simulations where a flipped bit means a redo. PassMark G3D hits 16973, which is fine for a 70W card. But raster performance sits at the 39th percentile, and ray tracing is 37th. This is not a gaming card, and the 4K gaming score of 30.9 confirms it. The 256 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate, but the 128-bit bus holds it back compared to wider workstation cards.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | RTX 2000 Ada |
| Brand | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace |
| Class | workstation |
| Process | 5 |
Memory
| VRAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128 |
| Bandwidth | 256 |
| ECC | Yes |
Compute
| CUDA Cores | 2816 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 |
| RT Cores | 22 |
| Base Clock | 1620 |
| Boost Clock | 2130 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 12 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 12 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 16973 |
| GPU Compute | 7874 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 70 |
| Recommended PSU | 300 |
| Cooler | Blower |
| Fans | 1 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 4 |
| HDMI | 0 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 8K |
Physical
| Slot Width | 2 |
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 |
vs Competition
Stacked against the ASUS TUF RTX 5090 or MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti, the RTX 2000 Ada looks slow. Those cards have way more cores, wider memory buses, and higher power limits. But they also pull 300W plus and lack ECC. The Gigabyte AORUS RTX 5080 and ZOTAC RTX 5080 are in a different league for gaming and raw compute. The Sapphire NITRO+ is an AMD option that trades blows on raster. For pure workstation reliability in a small form factor, the HP card holds its own. For everything else, it gets lapped.
| Spec | HP RTX 2000 Ada | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD | MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | RTX 2000 Ada | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
| Vram | 16GB GDDR6 | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2130 | 2407 | 2805 | 2482 | 2730 | 2680 |
| Tdp W | 70 | 575 | 360 | 300 | 360 | 339 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 128 | 512 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | workstation | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP RTX 2000 Ada | 67.1 | 36.3 | 66.9 | 38.6 | 31.1 | 42.9 | 20.6 | 99.4 | 49.2 | 24.1 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AORUS GV-N5080AORUS M-16GD Compare | 85.3 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 15.9 |
| MSI Ventus RTX 5070 Ti 16G VENTUS 3X PZ OC Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 87.9 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 94 | 21 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.3 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.1 | 91.7 | 83.8 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.7 | 98.7 | 17.6 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
At $1,067 to $1,164 USD, this is a tough sell for anyone outside a professional workflow. You're paying for ECC memory, low power draw, and the Ada Lovelace feature set, not raw speed. If your software needs certified drivers and ECC, the price makes sense. If you just want a fast GPU, there are gaming cards that crush this for less money. The affordability score sits at the 24th percentile, which tells you everything.
En savoir plus
Overview
The HP RTX 2000 Ada is a workstation card that knows exactly what it is. 16GB of ECC GDDR6, a 70W TDP, and a blower cooler that keeps heat out of your case. It's built for CAD, rendering, and AI-adjacent tasks, not for chasing frames in Cyberpunk.
Our database puts it at 51.4 for workstation use and 48.7 overall. The efficiency score is off the charts, 99th percentile. But the thermal score is rough, 21st percentile. That blower earns its keep, and you'll hear it.
Common Questions
Q: Can I game on the RTX 2000 Ada?
You can, but it's not great. The 4K gaming score is 30.9 out of 100, and raster performance sits at the 39th percentile. It'll handle older or less demanding titles at 1080p, but this card is built for work, not play.
Q: Does the blower cooler make a lot of noise?
Yes, under sustained load the blower fan spins up and gets audible. The thermal score is only 21st percentile, so the cooler works hard to keep the 70W chip in check. It's a trade-off for the compact, case-exhausting design.
Q: Is ECC memory worth the extra cost?
For long renders, simulations, or any compute job where a memory error means wasted hours, yes. ECC catches and corrects single-bit errors. If you're just gaming or doing light productivity work, you won't notice the difference.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you want a gaming card or need high raw compute. The RTX 2000 Ada gets smoked by cheaper consumer GPUs in raster and ray tracing. If you don't need ECC or a 70W power envelope, buy a RTX 5070 Ti or RX 7900 XT and pocket the difference. Also skip it if you need quiet operation, the blower cooler is not subtle under load.
Verdict
Buy this if you run certified workstation apps, need ECC memory, or have a strict power budget. It's a purpose-built tool, not a toy. CAD designers, 3D modelers, and AI tinkerers who value stability over speed will get their money's worth. Everyone else should keep scrolling.
Usage Scores
- Global48.7
- AI/LLM48.9
- Budget38.9
- Gaming 4k30.8
- Ray Tracing31.1
- Workstation53.7
- Gaming 1080p38.8
- Gaming 1440p36
- Content Creation37.5